Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 2137–2153 | Cite as

Multi-Objective Optimization of the Proposed Multi-Reservoir Operating Policy Using Improved NSPSO

  • Xuning Guo
  • Tiesong Hu
  • Conglin Wu
  • Tao Zhang
  • Yibing Lv
Article

Abstract

Severe water shortage is unacceptable for water-supply reservoir operation. For avoiding single periods of catastrophic water shortage, this paper proposes a multi-reservoir operating policy for water supply by combining parametric rule with hedging rule. In this method, the roles of parametric rule and hedging rule can be played at the same time, which are reducing the number of decision variables and adopting an active reduction of water supply during droughts in advance. In order to maintain the diversity of the non-dominated solutions for multi-objective optimization problem and make them get closer to the optimal trade-off surfaces, the multi-population mechanism is incorporated into the non-dominated sorting particle swarm optimization (NSPSO) algorithm in this study to develop an improved NSPSO algorithm (I-NSPSO). The performance of the I-NSPSO on two benchmark test functions shows that it has a good ability in finding the Pareto optimal set. The water-supply multi-reservoir system located at Taize River basin in China is employed as a case study to verify the effect of the proposed operating policy and the efficiency of the I-NSPSO. The operation results indicate that the proposed operating policy is suitable to handle the multi-reservoir operation problem, especially for the periods of droughts. And the I-NSPSO also shows a good performance in multi-objective optimization of the proposed operating policy.

Keywords

Multi-reservoir operating policy Parametric rule Hedging rule Water supply I-NSPSO 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Natural Sciences Foundation of China (71171151, 11201039), Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (20100141110061) and “PhD Short-time Mobility Program, Wuhan University”. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their review and constructive comments related to this manuscript.

Reference

  1. Arvanitidis NV, Rosing J (1970) Composite representation of a multi-reservoir hydroelectric power system. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 89(2):319–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayazit M, Unal NE (1990) Effects of hedging on reservoir performance. Water Resour Res 26(4):713–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bower BT, Hufschmidt MM, Reedy WW (1962) In: Maass A et al (eds) Operating procedures: Their role in the design of water-resource systems by simulation analysis in Design of Water-Resource Systems. Harvard Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandão J-LB (2010) Performance of the equivalent reservoir modeling technique for multi-reservoir hydropower systems. Water Resour Manag 24:3101–3114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang FJ, Chen L, Chang LC (2005) Optimizing the reservoir operating rule curves by genetic algorithms. Hydrol Processes 19:2277–2289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chau KW, Wu CL, Li YS (2005) Comparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze River. J Hydrol Eng 10(6):485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen L, Chang FJ (2007) Applying a real-coded multi-population genetic algorithm to multi-reservoir operation. Hydrol Processes 21:688–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen L, Mcphee J, Yeh WWG (2007) A diversified multiobjective GA for optimizing reservoir rule curves. Adv Water Resour 30:1082–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng CT, Wang WC, Xu DM, Chau KW (2008) Optimizing hydropower reservoir operation using hybrid genetic algorithm and chaos. Water Resour Manag 22(7):895–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark EJ (1956) Impounding reservoirs. J Am Water Works Assoc 48(4):349–354Google Scholar
  11. Draper AJ, Lund JR (2004) Optimal hedging and carryover storage value. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130(1):83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duan QY, Sorooshian S, Gupta VK (1992) Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour Res 28:1015–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fieldsend JE, Singh S (2002) A multi-objective algorithm based upon particle swarm optimization, an efficient data structure and turbulence. Proceedings of the 2002 U.K. Workshop on Computational Intelligence, Birmingham, UK. 37–44Google Scholar
  16. Hu X, Eberhart R (2002) Multiobjective optimization using dynamic neighborhood particle swarm optimization. Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Piscataway, New Jersey. Volume 2: 1677-1681Google Scholar
  17. Hui X, Eberhart RC, Shi Y (2003) Particle swarm with extended memory for multiobjective optimization. IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 193–197Google Scholar
  18. Jalali MR, Afshar A, Marrino MA (2007) Multi-colony ant algorithm for continuous multi-reservoir operation optimization problem. Water Resour Manag 21:1429–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang Y, Hu TS, Huang CC, Wu XN (2007) An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. Appl Math Comput 193:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle Swarm Optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks: 1942–1945Google Scholar
  21. Koutsoyiannis and Economou (2003) Evaluation of the parameterization-simulation-optimization approach for the control of reservoir systems. Water Resour Res 39(6):1170–1186Google Scholar
  22. Labadie J (2004) Optimal operation of multi-reservoir systems: State-of-the-art review. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130(2):93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu Y (2009) Automatic calibration of a rainfall-runoff model using a fast and elitist multi-objective particle swarm algorithm. Experts Syst Appl 36:9533–9538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lund JR, Guaman J (1999) Some derived operating rules for reservoirs in series or in parallel. J Water Resour Plan Manag 125(3):143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lund JR, Reed RU (1995) Drought water rationing and transferable rations. J Water Resour Plan Manag 121(6):429–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Margarita RS, Carlos AC (2006) Multi-objective particle swarm optimizers: a survey of the State-of-the-art. Int J Comput Intell Res 2(3):287–308Google Scholar
  27. Nalbantis, Koutsoyiannis (1997) Parametric rule for planning and management of multi-reservoir systems. Water Resour Res 33(9):2165–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neelakantan TR, Pundarikanthan NV (1999) Hedging rule optimization for water supply reservoir system. Water Resour Manag 13:409–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neelakantan TR, Pundarikanthan NV (2000) Neural network based simulation-optimization model for reservoir operation. J Water Resour Plan Manag 126(2):57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oliveira R, Loucks DP (1997) Operating rules for multi-reservoir systems. Water Resour Res 33(4):839–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reddy MJ, Kumar DN (2006) Optimal reservoir operation using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Water Resour Manag 20:861–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reddy MJ, Kumar DN (2007) Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for generating optimal trade-offs in reservoir operation. Hydrol Processes 21:2897–2909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robert MH, Jared LC, Charles SR (1977) Gains from joint operation of multiple reservoir systems. Water Resour Res 13(2):239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shiau JT (2011) Analytical optimal hedging with explicit incorporation of reservoir release and carryover storage targets. Water Resour Res 47:W01515. doi: 10.1029/2010WR009166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shiau JT, Lee HC (2005) Derivation of optimal hedging rules for a water-supply reservoir through compromise programming. Water Resour Manag 19:111–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shih JS, Revelle C (1994) Water supply operations during drought: continuous hedging rule. J Water Resour Plan Manag 120(5):613–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shih JS, Revelle C (1995) Water supply operations during drought: a discrete hedging rule. Eur J Oper Res 82:163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Srinivasan K, Philipose MC (1996) Evaluation and selection of hedging policies using stochastic reservoir simulation. Water Resour Manag 10(3):163–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Srinivasan K, Philipose MC (1998) Effect of hedging on over-year reservoir performance. Water Resour Manag 12:95–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tu MY, Hsu NS, Yeh WWG (2003) Optimization of reservoir management and operation with hedging rules. J Water Resour Plan Manag 129(2):86–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tu MY, Hsu NS, Frank TC, Yeh WWG (2008) Optimization of hedging rules for reservoir operations. J Water Resour Plan Manag 134(1):3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu CL, Chau KW, Li YS (2008) River stage prediction based on a distributed support vector regression. J Hydrol 358(1–2):96–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wurbs RA (1993) Reservoir system simulation and optimization models. J Water Resour Plan Manag 119(4):455–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yeh WWG (1985) Reservoir management and operation models: a state-of-the-art review. Water Resour Res 21(12):1797–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. You JY, Cai XM (2008a) Hedging rule for reservoir operations: 1. a theoretical analysis. Water Resour Res 44:W01415. doi: 10.1029/2006WR005481 Google Scholar
  46. You JY, Cai XM (2008b) Hedging rule for reservoir operations: 2. a numerical model. Water Resour Res 44:W01416. doi: 10.1029/2006WR005482 Google Scholar
  47. Zhao JS, Cai XM, Wang Z (2011) Optimality conditions for a two-stage reservoir operation problem. Water Resour Res 47:W08503. doi: 10.1029/2010WR009971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xuning Guo
    • 1
  • Tiesong Hu
    • 1
  • Conglin Wu
    • 2
  • Tao Zhang
    • 1
    • 3
  • Yibing Lv
    • 3
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering ScienceWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and ResearchChangjiang Water Resources CommissionWuhanChina
  3. 3.School of Information and MathematicsYangtze UniversityJingzhouChina

Personalised recommendations