Erratum to: Using Information-Gap Decision Theory for Water Resources Planning Under Severe Uncertainty

Erratum to: Water Resour Manage

DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-0164-4

The original version of this article unfortunately contained some mistakes. Please see below for some points that need to be corrected.

CORRECTION #1:

IN THE ORIGINAL VERSION EQUATION 2 IS:

$$ \hat{\beta }\left( {q,{{r}_{w}}} \right) = \min \left\{ {\alpha :\mathop{{\max }}\limits_{{u \in U\left( {\alpha ,\widetilde{u}} \right)}} \left( {q,u} \right) \le {{r}_{w}}} \right\} $$

(2)

BUT SHOULD READ AS BELOW:

$$ \hat{\beta }\left( {q,{{r}_{w}}} \right) = \min \left\{ {\alpha :\mathop{{\min }}\limits_{{u \in U\left( {\alpha ,\widetilde{u}} \right)}} \left( {q,u} \right) \le {{r}_{w}}} \right\} $$

(2)

CORRECTION #2:

AS FURTHER EXPLANATION FOR FIGURE 4, PLEASE INCLUDE THE TEXT:

The direction of the robustness and opportuneness curves in Figure 4 are opposite to those described in equations 1 and 2. The direction of these curves depends on the choice of performance criteria and it is possible to have these curves trend in either direction. The only requirement is that the direction of the opportuneness curve is opposite that of the robustness curve for any given performance criteria

Fig. 4

Results from random parameter combinations for a management plan that promotes a 15% increase in efficiency for 50% of residences

CORRECTION #3:

Opportuness should be spelt opportuneness.