Water Resources Management

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 535–551 | Cite as

Water Security Assessment: Integrating Governance and Freshwater Indicators

  • Emma S. Norman
  • Gemma Dunn
  • Karen Bakker
  • Diana M. Allen
  • Rafael Cavalcanti de Albuquerque
Article

Abstract

A new approach is developed for assessing water security status: the Water Security Status Indicators (WSSI) assessment method. The WSSI has four innovative aspects which address important gaps in the literature. First, it was developed in cooperation with end-users, whose participation enabled the design of a user-friendly assessment method. Second, this method is designed to be implemented at the local scale (small scale watershed or sub-watershed). Third, the WSSI is multivariate: it integrates variables pertaining to water quality and water quantity as they relate to aquatic ecosystems and human health. Fourth, the method provides concrete outputs for incorporation into water decision-making processes. In this paper, we document the WSSI assessment method and its application in a community in British Columbia (Canada), including the incorporation of community input into the development and application of the WSSI, and the integration of WSSI results into community water governance.

Keywords

Water security Governance Environment Indicators Assessment Framework Canada 

References

  1. Bakker K (2012) Water security: research challenges and opportunities. Science 337(6097):914–915. doi:10.1126/science.1226337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bond DOF, Ironside G, Buckland B, Smith R (2005) Current status, trends, and perceptions regarding environmental indicators and state of the environment reporting in Canada. Background paper to an environmental indicators and state of the environment reporting strategy, 2004–2009 (trans: K. I. S. Division). Environment Canada, GatineauGoogle Scholar
  3. Braden JB, Brown DG, Dozier J, Gober P, Hughes SM, Maidment DR, Schneider SL, Schultz PW, Shortle JS, Swallow St K, Werner CM (2009) Social science in a water observing system. Water Resour Res 45. doi:10.1029/2009WR008216
  4. Brennin R (2007) Linking information to the policy process for sustainable development. Lessons learned from relevant international examples. Environment Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  5. British Columbia Ministry of Environment (BCMoE) (2011) Sensitive stream assessment. British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Victoria http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/habitat/fish_protection_act/sensitive_streams/sensitive.html
  6. Brown A, Medd W, Anderson B (2012) Incorporating social science in water assessment practices. Developing novel approaches to tracking domestic water demand under uncertainty—a reflection on the “up scaling” of social science approaches in the United Kingdom. Water Res Man (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  7. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) (2001) Canadian water quality index 1.0 technical report and user’s manual. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, GatineauGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavalcanti de Albuquerque R, Allen DM, Kirste D (2012) A methodology for spatially representing the likelihood of occurrence of natural contaminants in groundwater. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1874-x
  9. Chaves HML, Alipaz S (2007) An integrated indicator based on basin hydrology, environment, life, and policy: the watershed sustainability index. Water Resour Manag 21(5):883–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook C, Bakker K (2012) Water security: debating an emerging paradigm. Glob Environ Chang 22(1):94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delanty G (2002) Knowledge as communication: a review of literature on method and theory in social science. Int J Soc Res Methods 5(1):83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Denhardt J, Denhardt R (2007) The new public service: serving not steering. ME Sharpe, ArmonkGoogle Scholar
  13. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2011) Indicators of sustainable development. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. DeRosemund S, Duro D, Dubé M (2008) Comparative analysis of regional water quality in Canada using the water quality index. Environ Monit Assess 156(1–4):223–240Google Scholar
  15. Dunn G (ed) (2012) Water security guidance document. UBC Program on Water Governance, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunn G, Bakker K (2009) Canadian approaches to assessing water security: an inventory of indicators. Program on Water Governance, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunn G, Bakker K (2011) Fresh water-related indicators in Canada: an inventory and analysis. Can Water Res J 36(2):135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ebert U, Welch H (2004) Meaningful environmental indices: a social approach. J Environ Econ Manag 27:270–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Environment Canada (2010a) Committee on the status of endangered wildlife in Canada. Environment Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  20. Environment Canada (2010b) Water availability index. Methodology and validation draft report. Environment Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  21. Falkenmark M (2007) Shift in thinking to address the 21st century hunger gap. Water Resour Manag 21(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Falkenmark M, Lundqvist J (1998) Towards water security: political determination and human adaptation crucial. Nat Resour Forum 22(1):37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Falkenmark M, Rockström J (2004) Balancing water for humans and nature: the new approach in ecohydrology. Earthscan, London, SterlingGoogle Scholar
  24. Falkenmark M, Lundqvist J, Widstrand C (1989) Macro-scale waterscarcity requires micro-scale approaches–aspects of vulnerability in semi-arid development. Nat Resour Forum 13(4):258–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fischhendler I, Heikkila T (2010) Does integrated water resources management support institutional change? the case of water policy reform in Israel. Ecol Soc 15:4–20Google Scholar
  26. Folke C (2006) The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvis T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio R Swed Acad Sci 31(5):437–440Google Scholar
  28. Gleick PH (1990) Vulnerability of water systems. In: Waggoner PE (ed) Climate change and US water resources. Wiley, New York, pp 223–240Google Scholar
  29. Gleick PH (1996) Basic water requirements for human activities: meeting basic needs. Water Int 21:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gleick PH, Chalecki EL, Wong A (2002) Measuring water well-being: water indicators and indices. In: Gleick PH, Pacific Institute for Studies in Development Environment and Security (eds) The world’s water: the biennial report on freshwater resources. Island Press, Washington, pp 87–112Google Scholar
  31. Glozier NE, Crosley RW, Mottle LW, Donald DB (2004) Water quality characteristics and trends for Banff and Jasper national parks: 1973–2002. Environment Canada, SaskatoonGoogle Scholar
  32. Golden Associates Ltd. (2005) Comprehensive groundwater modeling assignment, Final Report. Township of Langley, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  33. Halstead EC (1986) Ground water supply–Fraser Lowland, British Columbia. National Hydrology Research Centre SaskatoonGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamouda MA, Nour El-Din MM et al (2009) Vulnerability assessment of water resources systems in the Eastern Nile Basin. Water Resour Manag 23(13):2697–2725. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9404-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heap C, Kemp-Benedict E, Raskin P (1998) Conventional worlds: technical description of bending the curve scenarios. Polestar series report. Stockholm Environmental Institute, BostonGoogle Scholar
  36. Hill C, Furlong K, Bakker K, Cohen A (2008) Harmonization versus subsidiarity: emerging trends in water governance in Canada. Can Water Resour Assoc J 33(4):315–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. IPCC Secreteriat, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  38. Jasanoff S (2004) Science and citizenship: a new synergy. Sci Public Policy 31(2):90–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kerr, Wood, Leidal, Associates (2009) Betrand Creek ISMP final report. Report prepared for Township of Langley, British Columbia. Report Number 647.019Google Scholar
  40. Khan AA, Tobin A, Paterson R, Khan H, Warren R (2005) Application of CCME procedure for deriving site-specific water quality guidelines from the CCME water quality index. Water Qual Res J Can 40(4):448–456Google Scholar
  41. Lehtonen M (2008) Mainstreaming sustainable development in the OECD through indicators and peer reviews. Sustain Dev 16:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lemos MC, Bell AR, Engle NL, Formiga-Johnsson RM, Nelson DR (2010) Technical knowledge and water resources management: a comparative study of River Basin Councils. Water Resour Res 46Google Scholar
  43. Lumb A, Halliwell D, Sharma T (2006) Application of CCME water quality index to monitor water quality: a case of the Mackenzie River Basin, Canada. Environ Monit Assess 113:411–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCarthy S, James P, Bayliss C, (eds) (2010) Sustainable Cities, United Nations Global Compact, Cities Programme, vol. 1. New York and Melbourne, 134ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Meigh J, McKenzie A, Austin B, Bradford R, Reynard N (1998) Assessment of global water resources–phase II. In: Estimates of present and future water availability in Eastern and Southern Africa. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Molden D, de Fraiture C, Rijsberman F (2007) Water scarcity: the food factor. Issues Sci Tech 23(4):39–48Google Scholar
  47. Munda G (2005) Measuring sustainability: a multi-criterion framework. Environ Dev Sustain 7:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Niemeijer D, de Groot R (2008) A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol Indic 8(1):14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Norman E, Bakker K, Cook C, Dunn G, Allen D (2010) Water security: a primer. Canada water network: developing a Canadian water security framework as a tool for improved water governance for watersheds. Program on Water Governance, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  50. Norman E, Bakker K, Dunn G (2011) Recent developments in Canadian water policy: an emerging water security paradigm. Can Water Resour J 36(1):53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nowlan L, Bakker K (2010) Practising shared water governance in Canada: a primer. Program on Water Governance, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  52. Office of the Auditor General (OAG) (2010) An audit of the management of groundwater resources in British Columbia. Office of the Auditor General, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  53. Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2002) Aggregated environmental indices: review of aggregation methodologies in use. Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  54. Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  55. Pintér L, Hardi P, Bartelmus P (2005) Indicators of sustainable development: proposals for a way forward. UN Division for Sustainable Development, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Plummer R, de Loë R, Armitage D (2012) A systematic review of water vulnerability assessment tools. Water Res Man (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  57. Policy Research Institute (PRI) (2007) Canadian Water Sustainability Index (CWSI): project report. Policy Research Initiative, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  58. Raskin P (1997) Water futures: assessment of long-range patterns and problems background document to the comprehensive assessment of the freshwater resources of the world report. Stockholm Environmental Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  59. Sabatier P, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (2005) Swimming up-stream: collaboration approaches to watershed management. In: Kamieniecki S, Kraft ME (eds) American and comparative environmental policy. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  60. Simpson MWS (2012) Assessing risk to groundwater quality using an integrated risk framework. MSc thesis, Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BCGoogle Scholar
  61. Statistics Canada (2009) A framework for developing environmental statistics. Statistics Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  62. Sullivan C (2002) Calculating a water poverty index. World Dev 30(7):1195–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sullivan C, Meigh J (2007) Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: addressing water problems at different scales. Water Resour Manag 21(5):111–128Google Scholar
  64. Township of Langley (ToL) (2009) Township of Langley watershed management plan, final report. Township of LangleyGoogle Scholar
  65. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA) (2007) Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. United Nations World Water Assessment Program (UN WWAP) (2006) Water a shared responsibility. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  67. United Nations World Water Assessment Program (UN WWAP) (2009) Water in a changing world. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  68. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2002) Index of watershed indicators: an overview. Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  69. van der Keur P, Brugnach M et al (2010) Identifying uncertainty guidelines for supporting policy making in water management illustrated for Upper Guadiana and Rhine Basins. Water Resour Manag 24(14):3901–3938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van der Zaag P, Gupta J (2008) Scale issues in the governance of water storage projects. Water Resour Res 44. doi:10.1029/2007WR006364
  71. Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Reidy C, Liermann CR, Davies PM (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:551–561. doi:10.1038/nature09440 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch PA, McGlynn BL, Harman CJ, Gupta HV, Kumar P, Suresh P, Rao C, Basu NB, Wilson JS (2010) The future of hydrology: an evolving science for a changing world. Water Resour Res 46Google Scholar
  73. Water Systems Analysis Group (WSAG) (2005) Relative water stress index. University of New Hampshire, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  74. Wheater E, Evans E (2009) Land use, water management and future flood risk. Land Use Policy 26:S251–S264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emma S. Norman
    • 1
  • Gemma Dunn
    • 2
  • Karen Bakker
    • 3
  • Diana M. Allen
    • 4
  • Rafael Cavalcanti de Albuquerque
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA
  2. 2.Program on Water GovernanceUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Department of Geography and Program on Water GovernanceUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Department of Earth SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations