Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physiographic Drainage-Inundation Model Based Flooding Vulnerability Assessment

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flooding vulnerability assessment is an important issue in Taiwan since Taiwan lies within the most active tropical cyclone formation zone of the Western Pacific. Huge economic damages and losses of human lives are occurred almost every year. This study aims to evaluate flooding vulnerability of a given area subject to large-scale land developments. A scoring-based approach associated with a physiographic drainage-inundation model is developed to quantitatively evaluate vulnerability for flooding. The flooding vulnerability index defined as the product of an exposure score and a hazard score. The exposure score assesses relative losses exposed to flooding, which is determined by land-uses classification. The hazard score measures flooding severity, which is simultaneously determined by inundation depth and duration that are obtained from the inundation model for a design storm. The Yenshui River basin located in southwestern Taiwan is used an example to illustrate the proposed method. The results show that the projected urbanization plan within the Yenshui River basin would increase flooding vulnerability from 0.371 to 0.472. However, this value is reduced to 0.388 when the mitigation measure has been implemented. The obtained spatial distribution of flooding vulnerability for a design storm provides decision-makers useful information to identify hotspots of the study area and evaluate effects of flood-mitigation measure on flooding risk-reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barroca B, Bernardara P, Mouchel JM, Hubert G (2006) Indicators for identification of urban flooding vulnerability. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 6(4):553–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton C, Cutter SL (2008) Levee failures and social vulnerability in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Area, California. Nat Hazard Rev 9(3):136–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CN, Tsai CH, Tsai CT (2007) Reduction of discharge hydrograph and flood stage resulted from upstream detention ponds. Hydrol Processes 21(25):3492–3506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor RF, Hiroki K (2005) Development of a method for assessing flood vulnerability. Water Sci Technol 51(5):61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunge JA (1975) Two dimensional modeling of flood plains. in Unsteady Flow in Open Channel, Vol. II, edited by Mahmood K. and Yevjevich V., Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scott MS (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90(4):713–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte F, Strobl RO, Pennetta L (2006) A methodology using GIS, aerial photos and remote sensing for loss estimation and flood vulnerability analysis in the Supersano-Ruffano-Nociglia Graben, southern Italy. Environ Geol 50(4):581–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Nickum JE, Pan Y (2007) An assessment of flood hazard vulnerability in the Dongting Lake region of China. Lakes Reserv Res Manag 12(1):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green C (2004) The evaluation of vulnerability of flooding. Disaster Prev Manag 13(4):323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall J, Murphy C (2010) Vulnerability analysis of future public water supply under changing climate conditions: a case study of the Moy catchment, Western Ireland. Water Resour Manag 24(13):3527–3545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JW, Sayers PB, Dawson RJ (2005) National-scale assessment of current and future flood risk in England and Wales. Nat Hazards 36(1–2):147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamouda MA, Nour El-Din MM, Moursy FY (2009) Vulnerability assessment of water resources systems in the Eastern Nile Basin. Water Resour Manag 23(13):2697–2725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto T, Stedinger JR, Loucks DP (1982) Reliability, resiliency and vulnerability criteria for water resources systems performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Zou Y, Huang G, Maqsood I, Chakma A (2005) Flood vulnerability to climate change through hydrological modeling: a case study of the Swift Current Creek watershed in western Canada. Water Int 30(1):31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman SN, Kok M, Vrijling JK (2008) Flood risk assessment in the Netherlands: a case study for dike rink South Holland. Risk Anal 28(5):1357–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugeri N, Kundzewicz ZW, Genovese E, Hochrainer S, Radziejewski M (2010) River flood risk and adaptation in Europe − assessment of the present status. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 15(7):621–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer V, Scheuer S, Haase D (2009) A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde river, Germany. Nat Hazards 48(1):17–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odeh D (2002) Natural hazard vulnerability assessment for statewide mitigation planning in Rhode Island. Nat Hazard Rev 4(3):177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey RP, Pandey A, Galkate RV, Byun HR, Mal BC (2010) Integrating hydro-meteorological and physiographic factors for assessment of vulnerability to drought. Water Resour Manag 24(5):4199–4217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP, Li H (2003) Methodology for assessment of climate change impacts on large-scale flood protection system. J of Water Resour Plan Manag 129(5):361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson DM, Human RJ (2008) Large-scale vulnerability assessments for natural hazards. Nat Hazard 47(2):143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Sixth River Management Office (TSRMO) (1998) Regulation Planning for the Yenshui River. The Sixth River Management Office, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. (in Chinese)

  • Tingsanchali T, Karim MF (2005) Flood hazard and risk analysis in the southwest region of Bangladesh. Hydrol Process 19(10):2055–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingsanchali T, Karim F (2010) Flood-hazard assessment and risk-based zoning of a tropical flood plain: case study of the Yom River, Thailand. Hydrol Sci J 55(2):145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran P, Shaw R, Chantry G, Norton J (2009) GIS and local knowledge in disaster management: a case study of flood risk mapping in Viet Nam. Disasters 33(1):152–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu CC, Kuo TH (1999) Typhoons affecting Taiwan: current understanding and future challenges. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 80(1):67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the “Landmark Program of NCKU Top University Project” of National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, ROC (Project No. R-046). The authors acknowledge the Editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenq-Tzong Shiau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shiau, JT., Chen, CN. & Tsai, CT. Physiographic Drainage-Inundation Model Based Flooding Vulnerability Assessment. Water Resour Manage 26, 1307–1323 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9960-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9960-5

Keywords

Navigation