Water Resources Management

, Volume 25, Issue 11, pp 2731–2742 | Cite as

Application of the Sebs Water Balance Model in Estimating Daily Evapotranspiration and Evaporative Fraction from Remote Sensing Data Over the Nile Delta

  • Mohamed Elhag
  • Aris Psilovikos
  • Ioannis Manakos
  • Kostas Perakis
Article

Abstract

Estimation of evapotranspiration is always a major component in water resources management. The reliable estimation of daily evapotranspiration supports decision makers to review the current land use practices in terms of water management, while enabling them to propose proper land use changes. Traditional techniques of calculating daily evapotranspiration based on field measurements are valid only for local scales. Earth observation satellite sensors are used in conjunction with Surface Energy Balance (SEB) models to overcome difficulties in obtaining daily evapotranspiration measurements on a regional scale. In this study the SEB System (SEBS) is used to estimate daily evapotranspiration and evaporative fraction over the Nile Delta along with data acquired by the Advance Along Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) and the Medium Spectral Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS), and six in situ meteorological stations. The simulated daily evapotranspiration values are compared against actual ground-truth data taken from 92 points uniformly distributed all over the study area. The derived maps and the following correlation analysis show strong agreement, demonstrating SEBS’ applicability and accuracy in the estimation of daily evapotranspiration over agricultural areas.

Keywords

Daily evapotranspiration Evaporative fraction Water resources management SEBS model AATSR MERIS Nile Delta 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aboul Enien R, Abdel Shafi A, Abdel Monem M, Kamel A, Solh M, Bedier M, Khalifa H (2000) A new research paradigm for sustainability research in Egypt. Exp Agric 36(2):265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen R, Tasumi M, Trezza R (2007) Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC): model ASCE. J Irrig Drain Eng 133(4):380–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boegh E, Soegaard H, Thomsen A (2002) Evaluating evapotranspiration rates and surface conditions using Landsat TM to estimate atmospheric resistance and surface resistance. Remote Sens Environ 79:329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chowdary VM, Srivastava YK, Chandran V, Jeyaram A (2009) Integrated water resource development plan for sustainable management of Mayurakshi watershed, India using remote sensing and GIS. Water Resour Manag 23:1581–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delwart S, Preusker R, Bourg L, Santer R, Ramon D, Fischer J (2007) MERIS in-flight spectral calibration. Int J Remote Sens MERIS Spec Issue 28:3–4Google Scholar
  6. EAAE (2000) Pattern of changes in the economic value of irrigation water during the era of agricultural policies reform 1986–1996. Egyptian Association of Agricultural Economics report, pp 37–38Google Scholar
  7. ESRI (2008) ArcMap. Version 9.3 User manual. Redlands, CA, USA, pp 135–137Google Scholar
  8. FAO (2003) The strategy of agriculture development in Egypt until the Year 2017, pp 68–72Google Scholar
  9. Frey C, Rigo G, Parlow E (2007) Urban radiation balance of two coastal cities in a hot and dry environment. Int J Remote Sens 28(12):2695–2712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frey C, Parlow E, Vogt R, Harhash M, Abel Wahab M (2010) Flux measurements in Cairo. Part 1: in situ measurements and their applicability for comparison with satellite data. Int J Climatol (Online early view)Google Scholar
  11. Giardino C, Bresciani M, Villa P, Martinelli A (2010) Application of remote sensing in water resource management: the case study of Lake Trasimeno, Italy. Water Resour Manag 24:3885–3899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gontia NK, Tiwari KN (2010) Estimation of crop coefficient and evapotranspiration of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in an irrigation command using remote sensing and GIS. Water Resour Manag 24:1399–14141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gower S, Kucharik C, Norman J (1999) Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, fAPAR and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sens Environ 70:29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayes M, Svoboda M, Wilhite D, Vanyarkho O (1999) Monitoring the drought using the standardized precipitation index. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 80(3):429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huot P, Tait H, Rast M, Delwart S, Bézy L, Levrini G (2001) The optical imaging instruments and their applications: AATSR and MERIS. ESA Bulletin 106:55–66Google Scholar
  16. Jacob F, Olioso A, Gu X, Su Z, Seguin B (2002) Mapping surface fluxes using airborne visible, near infrared, thermal infrared remote sensing data and a spatialized surface energy balance model. Agronomie 22:669–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jin X, Wan L, Su Z (2005) Research on evaporation of Taiyuan basin area by using remote sensing. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discussion 2:209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kalma J, Jupp D (1990) Estimating evaporation from pasture using infrared thermometry: evaluation of a one-layer resistance model. Agric For Meteorol 51:223–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kustas W, Norman J (1996) Use of remote sensing for evapotranspiration monitoring over land surfaces. Hydrol Sci J 41(4):495–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lagouarde J, Jacob F, Gu X, Olioso A, Bonnefond J, Kerr Y, McAneney K, Irvine M (2002) Spatialization of sensible heat flux over a heterogeneous landscape. Agronomie 22:627–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Z, Tang R, Wan Z, Bi Y, Zhou C, Tang B, Yan G, Zhang X (2009) A review of current methodologies for regional evapotranspiration estimation from remotely sensed data. Sensors 3801–3853Google Scholar
  22. Liu C, Wang H (1999) The interface processes of water movement in the soil-crop-atmosphere system and water-saving regulation. Beijing Science Press, pp 24–101Google Scholar
  23. Menenti M (1984) Physical aspects and determination of evaporation in deserts applying remote sensing techniques Report 10 (Special issue). Institute for Land and Water Management Research (ICW). The Netherlands, pp 202–203Google Scholar
  24. Moran M, Clarke T, Inoue Y, Vidal A (1994) Estimating crop water deficit using the relation between surface-air temperature and spectral vegetation index. Remote Sens Environ 49:246–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Muthuwatta LP, Ahmad MD, Bos MG, Rientjes THM (2010) Assessment of water availability and consumption in the Karkheh River Basin—Iran using remote sensing and geo-statistics. Water Resour Manag 24:459–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Olioso A, Chauki H, Courault D, Wigneron J (1999) Estimation of evapotranspiration and photosynthesis by assimilation of remote sensing data into SVAT models. Remote Sens Environ 68:341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sellers P, Randall D, Collatz J, Berry J, Field C, Dazlich D, Zhang C, Collelo G, Bounous A (1996) A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs: model formulation. J Clim 9:676–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Su Z (2001) A surface energy balance system (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes from point to continental scale. In: Su Z, Jacobs C (eds) Advanced earth observation land surface climate. Publications of the National Remote Sensing Board (BCRS), USP-2, 01-02, pp 184–185Google Scholar
  29. Su Z (2002) The surface energy balance system SEBS for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6(1):85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Su Z, Pelgrum M, Menenti M (1999) Aggregation effects of surface heterogeneity in land surface processes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 3(4):549–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Su Z, Schmugge T, Kustas P, Massman J (2001) An evaluation of two models for estimation of the roughness height for heat transfer between the land surface and the atmosphere. J Appl Meteorol 40(11):1933–1951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Su Z, Yacob A, Wen J, Roerink G, He Y, Gao B, Boogaard H, Diepen C (2003) Assessing relative soil moisture with remote sensing data: theory, experimental validation, and application to drought monitoring over the North China Plain. Phys Chem Earth 28:89–101Google Scholar
  33. Taylor A (1981) A method for surface irrigation design based on infiltration using the border strip as an infiltrometer. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, Lincoln College, New Zealandm, p 228Google Scholar
  34. Wu CD, Lo HC, Cheng CC, Chen YK (2010) Application of SEBAL and Markov models for future stream flow simulation through remote sensing. Water Resour Manag 24:3773–3797CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed Elhag
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aris Psilovikos
    • 3
  • Ioannis Manakos
    • 1
  • Kostas Perakis
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Geoinformation in Environmental ManagementMediterranean Agronomic Institute of ChaniaChaniaGreece
  2. 2.Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, School of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of ThessalyN. Ionia MagnisiasGreece
  3. 3.Department of Agriculture Ichthyology and Aquatic Environment, School of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of ThessalyN. Ionia MagnisiasGreece
  4. 4.Department of Planning and Regional Development, School of EngineeringUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece

Personalised recommendations