Abstract
Inapplicability of state of the art hydrological models due to scarce data motivates the need for a modeling approach that can be well constrained to available data and still model the dominant processes. Such an approach requires embedded model relationships to be simple and parsimonious in parameters for robust model selection. Simplicity in functional relationship is also important from water management point of view if these models are to be coupled with economic system models for meaningful policy assessment. We propose a similar approach, but rather than selecting (through calibration) processes from a set of processes predefined in terms of functionalities or modules, we model already known dominant processes in dryland areas (evaporation, Hortonian overland flows, transmission loses and subsurface flows) in a simple manner by explicitly programming them as constraints and obtain parameters by minimizing a performance based objective function. Such use of mathematical programming allows flexible model calibration and simulation in terms of available data and constraints. The model results of the approach are however not perfect given its infancy. Nonetheless its imperfections can guide us to further improvements, in particular with regards to model structure improvement.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Beven KJ (2002) Runoff generation in semi-arid areas. In: Bull LJ, Kirby MJ (eds) Dryland rivers: hydrology and geomorphology of semi-arid channels. Wiley, England, p 393
Bosilovich M (2008) NASA’s modern era retrospective-analysis for research and applications: integrating Earth observations. Earthzine. Available at www.earthzine.org/2008/09/26/nasas-modern-era-retrospective-analysis/
Chambers DP (2006) Evaluation of new GRACE time-variable gravity data over the ocean. Geophys Res Lett 33(17):LI7603
Clark MP, Slater AG, Rupp DE, Woods RA, Vrugt JA, Gupta HV, Wagener T, Hay LE (2008) Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): a modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models. Water Resour Res 44:W00B02. doi:10.1029/2007WR006735
Clark MP, Rupp DE, Woods RA, Tromp-van Meerveld HJ, Peters NE, Freer JE (2009) Consistency between hydrological models and field observations: linking processes at the hillslope scale to hydrological responses at the watershed scale. Hydrol Process 23:311–319
Cosby BJ, Hornberger GM, Clapp RB, Ginn TR (1984) A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils. Water Resour Res 20(6):682–690
Cucker F, Smale S (2002) On the mathematical foundations of learning. Bull Am Math Soc 39(1):1–49
Cudennec C, Leduc C, Koutsoyiannis D (2007) Dryland hydrology in Mediterranean regions—a review. Hydrol Sci J 52(6):1077–1087
Doherty J, Welter D (2010) A short exploration of structural noise. Water Resour Res 46:W05525. doi:10.1029/2009WR008377
Dunkerley D (2000) Measuring interception loss and canopy storage in dryland vegetation: a brief review and evaluation of available research strategies. Hydrol Process 14:669–678
Eagleson PS (1982) Ecological optimality in water-limited natural soil-vegetation systems. 1. Theory hypothesis. Water Resour Res 18(2):325–340
FAO (2003) The digital soil map of the W, version 2.3. Land and water development division. FAO, Rome
Fenicia F, McDonnell JJ, Savenije HHG (2008) Learning from model improvement: on the contribution of complementary data to process understanding. Water Resour Res 44:W06419. doi:10.1029/2007WR006386
Franchini M, Wendling J, Obled C, Todini E (1996) Physical interpretation and sensitivity analysis of the TOPMODEL. J Hydrol 175:293–338
GAMS (2003) GAMS-A user’s guide: tutorial by Richard E Rosenthal. GAMS Development Corporation, Washington DC, p 273
Gulden LE, Rosero E, Yang Z-L, Rodell M, Jackson CS, Niu G-Y, Yeh PJ-F, Famiglietti J (2007) Improving land-surface model hydrology: is an explicit aquifer model better than a deeper soil profile? Geophys Res Lett 34:L09402. doi:10.1029/2007GL029804
Hargreaves HG, Allen RG (2003) History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equation. J Irrig Drain Eng January/February 2003:53–63
Harou JJ, Pulido-Velazquez M, Rosenberg DE, Medellin-Azuara J, Lund JR, Howitt RE (2009) Hydro-economic models: concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. J Hydrol 375:627–643
Heckman JJ (2009) The scientific model of causality. Sociol Method 35(1):1–97
Hoeksema RJ, Kitanidas PK (1984) An application of the geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in two-dimensional groundwater modeling. Water Resour Res 20(7):1003–1020
ITC (2009) ILWIS 2.1 application guide. Available online at http://www2.itc.nl/ilwis/documentation/version_2/aguide.asp. Accessed on 08 December 2009, p 352
Li H, Sivapalan M (2010) Functional approach to exploring climatic and landscape controls on runoff generation. 1. Behavorial constraints on climate, soil and topography. Water Resour Res
Lo M-H, Famiglietti JS, Yeh PJF, Syed TH (2010) Improving parameter estimation and water table depth simulation in a land surface model using GRACE water storage and estimated base flow data. Water Resour Res 46:W0551710. doi:1029/2009WR007855
Maneta MP, Torres MO, Wallender WW, Vosti S, Howitt R, Rodrigues L, Bassoi LH, Panday S (2009) A spatially distributed hydroeconomic model to assess the effects of drought on land use, farm profits, and agricultural employment. Water Resour Res 45:W11412. doi:10.1029/2008WR007534
McIntyre N, Al-Qurashi A (2009) Performance of ten rainfall–runoff models applied to an arid catchment in Oman. Environ Model Softw 24:726–738
Michaud J, Sorooshian S (1994) Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed. Water Resour Res 3(3):593–605
Mitchell TD, Jones PD (2005) An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int J Climatol 25:693–712. doi:10.1002/joc.1181
Niu G-Y, Yang Z-L, Dickinson RE, Gulden LE, Su H (2007) Development of a simple groundwater model for use in climate models and evaluation with gravity recovery and climate experiment data. J Geophys Res 112:D07103. doi:10.1029/2006JD007522
Norkin VI, Keyzer MA (2009) Asymptotic efficiency of kernel support vector machines (SVM). Cybern Syst Anal 45(4):575–588
Pande S, McKee M, Bastidas LA (2009) Complexity-based robust hydrologic prediction. Water Resour Res 45:W10406. doi:10.1029/2008WR007524
Pilgrim DH, Chapman TG, Doran DG (1988) Problems of rainfall–runoff modelling in arid and semiarid regions. Hydrol Sci J 33(4):379–400
Pulido-Velazquez D, Sahuquillo A, Andreu J, Pulido-Velazquez M (2007) An efficient conceptual model to simulate surface water body–aquifer interaction in conjunctive use management models. Water Resour Res 43:W07407. doi:10.1029/2006WR005064
Rawls WJ, Brakensiek DL, Saxton KE (1982) Estimation of soil water properties. Trans ASAE 25(5):1316–1320, 1328
Rienecker MM and co-authors (2008) The GEOS-5 data assimilation system—documentation of versions 5.0.1 and 5.1.0, vol 27. NASA GSFC Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, NASA/TM-2007-104606, p 92
Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Porporato A (2004) Ecohydrology of water-controlled ecosystems: soil moisture and plant dynamics. Cambridge University Press, NY, p 442
Roy PS, Agrawal S, Joshi P, Shukla Y (2003) The land cover map for southern Asia for the year 2000. GLC2000 database, European Commision Joint Research Centre, 2003. http://www-gem.jrc.it/glc2000
Savenije HHG (2009) The art of hydrology. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:157–161
Savenije HHG (2010) HESS opinions “Topography driven conceptual modelling (FLEX-Topo)”. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:2681–2692. doi:10.5194/hess-14-2681-2010
Seong K (2002) A study on the effective hydraulic conductivity of an anisotropic porous medium. KSME Int J 16(7):959–965
Sharma KD, Murthy JSR (1998) A practical approach to rainfall–runoff modeling in arid zone drainage basins. Hydrol Sci J 43(3):331–348
Sheffield J, Ferguson CR, Troy TJ, Wood EF, McCabe MF (2009) Closing the terrestrial water budget from satellite remote sensing. Geophys Res Lett 36:L07403. doi:10.1029/2009GL037338
Sun AY, Green R, Rodell M, Swenson S (2010) Inferring aquifer storage parameters using satellite and in situ measurements: estimation under uncertainty. Geophys Res Lett 37:L10401. doi:10.1029/2010GL043231
Syed TH, Famiglietti JS, Chen J, Rodell M, Seneviratne SI, Viterbo P, Wilson CR (2005) Total basin discharge for the Amazon and Mississippi River basins from GRACE and a land–atmosphere water balance. Geophys Res Lett 32:L24404. doi:10.1029/2005GL024851
Tiwari VM, Wahr J, Swenson S (2009) Dwindling groundwater resources in northern India, from satellite gravity observations. Geophys Res Lett 36:L18401. doi:10.1029/2009GL039401
van den Boom B, Pande S (2007) A user manual for the SAS facility to plot maps. Working Paper 07-03. Amsterdam, SOW-VU, p 38
Vogel RM (2006) Regional calibration of watershed models. In: Singh V, Frevert D (eds) Watershed models. Taylor & Francis, pp 47–69
Werth S, Güntner A, Petrovic S, Schmidt R (2009) Integration of GRACE mass variations into a global hydrological model. Earth Planet Sci Lett 277:166–173
Wittenberg H, Sivapalan M (1999) Watershed groundwater balance estimation using streamflow recession analysis and baseflow separation. J Hydrol 219:20–33
Yeh PJ-F, Swenson SC, Famiglietti JS, Rodell M (2006) Remote sensing of groundwater storage changes in Illinois using the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE). Water Resour Res 42:W12203. doi:10.1029/2006WR005374
Yu B, Tisdell J, Podger G, Salbe L (2003) A hydrologic and economic model for water trading and reallocation using linear programming techniques. Paper presented at MODSIM 2003 international congress on modelling and simulation, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Pande, S., Savenije, H.H.G., Bastidas, L.A. et al. A Parsimonious Hydrological Model for a Data Scarce Dryland Region. Water Resour Manage 26, 909–926 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9816-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9816-z