Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Water Resources Management
  3. Article

Fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Applied to Karun Reservoirs System

  • Open access
  • Published: 16 October 2010
  • Volume 25, pages 545–563, (2011)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Applied to Karun Reservoirs System
Download PDF
  • Amin Afshar1,
  • Miguel A. Mariño2,
  • Motahareh Saadatpour3 &
  • …
  • Abbas Afshar4 
  • 3405 Accesses

  • 132 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Water resource systems, with an abundance of project purposes and resource values, are subject to conflicting policy, planning, and management decisions. Multi-criteria decision making methods (MCDM) provide a framework to help water managers identify critical issues, attach relative priorities to those issues, select best compromise alternatives, and facilitate communication to gain general acceptance. This paper addresses a method that incorporates several system factors/components within a general framework for providing a holistic analysis of the problems and comprehensive evaluation of the related mitigation/adaptation measures and policy responses. The method accounts for uncertainties in both the quantification and importance of objectives in the ranking process. The proposed fuzzy multi-criteria decision making process uses the well known Technique for Order Preference by Similarity of Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method in both deterministic and uncertain environments. The performance of the proposed approach to a real water resource management problem in Iran is illustrated. Results show that the model may be used in a large-scale multi-level assessment process. Ranks of the alternatives are presented using deterministic and fuzzy based models.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

A Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Methodology Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets: Application to Water Resources Management

Article 21 September 2020

Regional Water Resource Security in China Based on a New Fuzzy Method with Combination Weighting

Article 29 June 2022

A Review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Reference to Water Resources and Climate Science Applications

Chapter © 2021

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Decision Making
  • Methodology of Data Collection and Processing
  • Mixed Methods
  • Operations Research and Decision Theory
  • Utilitarianism
  • Water Policy
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Abrishamchi A, Ebrahimian A, Tajrishy M, Mariño MA (2005) Case study: application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply. J Water Resour Plan Manage 131(4):326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashtian B, Haghighirad F, Makui A, Montazer GA (2009) Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing 9:457–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros MT-L, Tsai FT-C, Yang S-L, Lopes JEG, Yeh WW-G (2003) Optimization of large-scale hydropower system operations. J Water Resour Plan Manage 129(3):178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borri D, Concilio G, Conte E (1998) A fuzzy approach for modeling knowledge in environmental systems evaluation. Comput Environ Urban Syst 22(3):299–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Lasdon L, Michelsen AM (2004) Group decision making in water resources planning using multiple objective analysis. J Water Resour Plan Manage 130(1):4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai YP, Huang GH, Lu HW et al (2009) I-VFRP: an interval-valued fuzzy robust programming approach for municipal waste management planning under uncertainty. Eng Optim 41(5):399–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T-C (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu TC (2002) Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20:859–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckstein L, Treichel W, Magnouni S (1994) Ranking ground-water management alternatives by multicriterion analysis. J Water Resour Plan Manage 120:546–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertuğrul I, Karakaşoğlu N (2008) Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:783–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertuğrul I, Güneş M (2007) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for machine selection. Anal Des Intel Sys using SC Tech ASC 41:638–648, Springer, Heidelberg

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira J, Salvatore G, Ehrgott M (eds) (2005a) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueira J, Mousseau V, Roy B (2005b) ELECTRE methods. In: Figueira J, Salvatore G, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin, pp 133–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Flug M, Seitz HLH, Scott JF (2000) Multicriteria decision analysis applied to Glen Canyon Dam. J Water Resour Plan Manage 126(5):270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu G (2008) A fuzzy optimization method for multicriteria decision making: an application to reservoir flood control operation. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershon L, Duckstein L, Aniff RM (1982) Multiobjective river basin planning with qualitative criteria. Water Resour Res 118(2):193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goicoechea A, Hansen DR, Duckstein L (1982) Multi-objective decision analysis with engineering and business applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez B, Adenso-Diaz B, Gonzalez-Torre PL (2002) A fuzzy logic approach for the impact assessment in LCA. Resour Conserv Recycl 37:61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manage 21(9):1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CH, Chen SH (1999) A model and algorithm of fuzzy product positioning. Inf Sci 121:61–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde KM, Maier HR, Colby CB (2004) Reliability-based approach to multicriteria decision analysis for water resources. J Water Resour Plan Manage 130(6):429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hydroinformatic Research Center (2005) Karun reservoirs environmental impact assessment: final report. Iran University of Science and Technology, 4 volumes

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kheireldin K, Fahmy H (2001) Multi-criteria approach for evaluating long term water strategies. Water Int 26(4):527–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai E, Lundie S, Ashbol NJ (2008) Review of multicriteria decision aid for integrated sustainability assessment of urban water systems. Urban Water J 5(4):315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larichev OI, Moshkovich HM (1995) ZAPROS-LM: a method and system for ordering multiattribute alternatives. Eur J Oper Res 82:503–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu KFR, Huang SC, Liang HH (2009) A qualitative decision support for environmental impact assessment using fuzzy logic. J Environ Inform 13(2):93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund JR (1991) Random variables versus uncertain values: stochastic modeling and design. J Water Resour Plan Manage 117(2):179–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund JR (2008) A risk analysis of risk analysis. J Contemporary Water Research & Education 140:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morón B, Delgado Calvo-Flores M, Martín Ramos JM, Polo Almohano MP (2009) AIEIA: software for fuzzy environmental impact assessment. Expert Syst Appl 36:9135–9149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourits M, Oude Lansink A (2006) Multi-criteria decision making to evaluate quarantine disease control strategies. In: Oude Lansink A (ed) New approaches to the economics of plant health. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 131–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Netto OC, Parent E, Duckstein L (1996) Multicriterion design of long-term water supply in southern France. J Water Resour Plan Manage 122(6):403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peche R, Rodríguez E (2009) Environmental impact assessment procedure: a new approach based on fuzzy logic. Environ Impact Asses Rev 29:275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju KS, Duckstein L, Arondel C (2000) Multicriterion analysis for sustainable water resources planning: a case study in Spain. Water Resour Manage 14(6):435–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2004) Decision making: the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13(1):1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic S (1989) Application of water resources systems concept to the formulation of a water master plan. Water Int 14:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan Q, Huang GH, Cai YP (2009) A superiority-inferiority-based inexact fuzzy-stochastic programming approach for solid waste management under uncertainty. Environ Model Assess 15:381–396. doi:10.1007/s10666-009-9214-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tecle A, Fogel M, Duckstein L (1988) Multi-criterion selection of wastewater management alternatives. J Water Resour Plan Manage 114(4):383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantphyllou E, Lin CT (1996) Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multi attribute decision making methods. Int J Approx Reason 14:281–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1987) Methodological guidelines for the integrated environmental evaluation of water resources development. International Hydrological Program, UNESCO, United Nations Environmental Program, Paris

  • Zhou HC, Wang GL, Yang Q (1999) A multi-objective fuzzy recognition model for assessing groundwater vulnerability based on the DRASTIC system. Hydrol Sci J 44:611–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann H-J (1996) Fuzzy set theory and its applications, 3rd edn. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA

    Amin Afshar

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA

    Miguel A. Mariño

  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Motahareh Saadatpour

  4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Enviro-Hydroinformatic Center of Excellence, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran

    Abbas Afshar

Authors
  1. Amin Afshar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel A. Mariño
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Motahareh Saadatpour
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abbas Afshar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Afshar.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Afshar, A., Mariño, M.A., Saadatpour, M. et al. Fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Applied to Karun Reservoirs System. Water Resour Manage 25, 545–563 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9713-x

Download citation

  • Received: 23 June 2009

  • Accepted: 20 September 2010

  • Published: 16 October 2010

  • Issue Date: January 2011

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9713-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • TOPSIS
  • MCDM
  • Fuzzy
  • Water resources
  • Uncertainty
  • Karun river basin

Profiles

  1. Motahareh Saadatpour View author profile
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

152.53.39.118

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature