Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are the Consumers Always Ready to Pay? A Quasi-Almost Ideal Demand System for the Italian Water Sector

Water Resources Management volume 25, pages 465–481 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Although drinking water amounts to 1.03% of the total water available daily for Italian consumers, this service is not easily replaced with other goods. Water is a basic need, and its consumption should be ensured for everyone. Yet the scarcity of this resource implies that any loss should be strongly discouraged. These countervailing incentives regarding water consumption should be considered by the regulator when determining the optimal final tariff. I estimate a complete quasi—almost ideal demand system using Italian households data from 1999 to 2005 in order to verify the effects—on different types of Italian consumers—of a 1% rise in water tariffs. First, the results demonstrate that the mean of water elasticity (with respect to price and income) for Italian consumers is aligned with consumers in other European countries. Second, the paper establishes that a rise in the water tariff leads to a small contraction in expenditures on personal care and non essential goods. Finally, this paper shows that a change in the water tariff affects senior citizens and the population of southern Italy more than other consumer types. The regulator should consider all these effects when determining the final pricing policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Agthe DE, Billings RB (1980) Price elasticities for water: a case of increasing block rates. Land Econ 56:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agthe DE, Billings RB (1997) Equity and conservation pricing policy for a government-run water utility. J Water Supply Res Technol, AQUA 46(5):252–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Agthe DE, Billings RB, Dobra JL, Rafiee K (1986) A simultaneous equation demand model for block rates. Water Resour Res 22(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alessie R, Kapteyn A (2001) New data for understanding saving. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 17:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbués F et al (2003) Estimation of residential water demand: a state-of-the-art review. J Socio-Econ 32:81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton J (2000) Cost inefficiency in the UK water and sewerage industries. Appl Econ Lett 7:455–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks J, Blundell R, Lewebel A (1997) Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrittella M, Rehdanz K, Roson R, Tol RSJ (2008) The economic impact of water taxes: a computable general equilibrium analysis with an international data set. Water Policy 10(3):259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya A, Parker E, Raffiee K (1994) An examination of the effect of ownership on the relative efficiency of public and private water utilities. Land Econ 70(2):197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clagget T (1994) A cost function study of the providers of TVA power. Manage Decis Econ 15:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comitato per la Vigilanza delle Risorse Idriche (coviri) (2009) Relazione annuale al Parlamento sullo stato dei servizi idrici. Roma, p 15

  • Corral L, Fisher AC, Hatch N (1998) Price and non-price influences on water conservation: an econometric model of aggregate demand under nonlinear budget constraint. Working Paper No. 881, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy, University of California at Berkeley

  • Dandy G, Nguyen T, Davies C (1997) Estimating residential water demand in the presence of free allowances. Land Econ 73:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton A, Muellbauer J (1980) An almost ideal demand system. Am Econ Rev 70(3):312–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Monte A, Papagni E (2008) Public expenditure, corruption, and economic growth: the case of Italy. Eur. J Polit Econ 17(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espey M, Espey J, Shaw WD (1997) Price elasticity of residential demand for water: a meta-analysis. Water Resour Res 33(6):1369–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2008a) Use of water from public water supply by services and private households

  • Eurostat (2008b) Data on population in the EU area

  • Garcia S, Thomas A (2001) The structure of municipal water supply cost: an application to a panel of french local communities. Journal of Productivity Analysis 16:5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin RC, Chang C (1990) Pretest analysis of water demand in thirty communities. Water Resour Res 26:2251–2255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher D, Shore N, Train K (2005) Households’ willingness to pay for water service attributes. Environ Resour Econ 32:509-531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt JA, Hanemann WM (1995) A discrete/continuous choice approach to residential water demand under block rate pricing. Land Econ 71:173–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT (1999–2005a) I consumi delle famiglie

  • ISTAT (1999–2005b) Indici dei Prezzi al Consumo

  • ISTAT (1999) Sistema delle Indagini sulle Acque

  • ISTAT (2005a) Sistema delle Indagini sulle Acque

  • ISTAT (2005b) Demografia in cifre

  • Jones CV, Morris JR (1984) Instrumental price estimates and residential water demand. Water Resour Res 20:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau LJ (1978) Testing and imposing monotonicity, convexity, and quasi convexity constraints. In: Fuss M, McFadden D (eds) Production economics: a dual approach to theory and applications, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonida L, Petraglia C, Murillo-Zamorano L (2004) Total factor productivity and the convergence hypothesis in the Italian regions. Appl Econ 36(19):2187–2193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Chen X, Wang S (2009) Evaluating and predicting shadow prices of water resources in China and its nine major river basins. Water Resour Manage 23:1467–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Espiñeira R (2002) Residential water demand in the northwest of Spain. Environ Resour Econ 21:161–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minville M, Krau S, Brisette F, Leconte R (2010) Behaviour and performance of a water resource system in Québec (Canada) under adapted operating policies in a climate change context. Water Resour Manage 24(7):1333–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschini G (1998) The semiflexible almost ideal demand system. Eur Econ Rev 42(2):349–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschini G (1999) Imposing local curvature conditions in flexible demand systems. J Bus Econ Stat 17(4):487–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauges C, Thomas A (2000) Privately-operated water utilities, municipal price negotiation, and estimation of residential water demand: the case of France. Land Econ 76(1):68–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbery D (2002) Privatization, restructuring, and regulation of network utilities. MIT Press Books, MIT, Cambridge, 484 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieswiadomy ML (1992) Estimating urban residential demand: effects of price structure, conservation and education. Water Resour Res 28(3):609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieswiadomy ML, Molina DJ (1988) Urban water demand estimates under increasing block rates. Growth Change 19:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007) Household water pricing in OECD countries. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pint E (1999) Household responses to increased water rates during the California drought. Land Econ 75:246–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Point P (1993) Partage de la ressource en eau et demande d’alimentacion en eau potable. Rev Écon 44:849–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick ME, Green R (2000) Do residential water demand side management policies measure up? An analysis of eight California water agencies. J Environ Econ Manage 40:37–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salman A, Al-Karablieh E, Haddadin M (2008) Limits of pricing policy in curtailing household water consumption under scarcity conditions. Water Policy 10(3):295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer J, Frohberg K (2007) Allocative efficiency of rural water supply-a globally flexible SGM cost frontier. Journal of Productivity Analysis 27:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider ML, Whitlatch EE (1991) User-specific water demand elasticities. J Water Resour Plan Manage 117(1):52–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens TH, Miller J, Willis C (1992) Effect of price structure on residential water demand. Water Resour Bull 28(4):681–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Teeples R, Glyer D (1987) Cost of water delivery system: specification and ownership effects. Rev Econ Stat 69(3):399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiezzi S (2005) The welfare effects and the distributive impact of carbon taxation on Italian households. Energy Policy (33):1597–1612

  • Water Framework Directive (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000

  • Zhao RH, Chen SY (2008) Fuzzy pricing for urban water resources: model construction and application. J Environ Manag (88):458–466

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Economics, University of Rome 3, Rome, Italy

    Valeria Di Cosmo

Authors
  1. Valeria Di Cosmo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valeria Di Cosmo.

Additional information

I thank Silvia Tiezzi for her valuable comments and suggestions and the University of Siena to kindly provide me the data on Italian consumption. I also thank Pierpaolo Pierani for helpful comments and ISTAT that gives me the data on Italian water prices. All errors are of course mine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Cosmo, V. Are the Consumers Always Ready to Pay? A Quasi-Almost Ideal Demand System for the Italian Water Sector. Water Resour Manage 25, 465–481 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9709-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9709-6

Keywords

search

Navigation