Abstract
This study attempts to examine if catchment variability favours regionalisation by principles of catchment similarity. Our work combines calibration of a simple conceptual model for multiple objectives and multi-regression analyses to establish a regional model between model sensitive parameters and physical catchment characteristics (PCCs). The objective is to test robustness of regionalisation by assessing if generalisation of a wide range of climatic, topographic and physiographic settings in a regional model favours simulation of stream flow at ungauged catchments. Constraints in this work are very stringent performance measures for selection of catchments to establish the regional model and the selection of only PCCs that are available through the database of the National River Flow Archive in the United Kingdom. As such some PCCs have been ignored that have proven to be effective in other studies. For this study 56 well-gauged catchments in England and Wales are used. For model calibration and runoff simulation of ungauged catchments the HBV model is applied. Optimum parameter sets are derived for 48 catchments through Monte Carlo Simulation using an 8-year simulation period. This study aims to adequately simulate all aspects of the hydrograph at the ungauged catchment and therefore four single objective functions are combined in a multi-objective function. After calibration, 17 catchments that are widely spread over England and Wales are selected to establish relationships for seven selected model parameters using 14 PCCs (area, mean elevation, hypsometric integral, catchment shape, standard average annual rainfall, five types of land use and four classes of hydrogeology). Single and multiple regression analysis are applied to identify these relationships. For six model parameters statistically significant relationships could be established three of which are plausible on the basis of hydrologic interpretation. The established relationships are validated at eight gauged catchments that are spread over the UK and cover a large range of values of catchment descriptors. These catchments are assumed ungauged and results revealed that, in general, model parameters determined by the established regional relationships do not perform better as compared to default parameter values. Similar results are obtained for additional validation runs using catchments that are not used in the regionalisation procedure. Since these parameters are based on model performance assessments in a wide range of catchment settings, this suggests that large variability in settings of PCCs does not favour regionalisation. Therefore, for selected catchments the applicability of regionalisation by principles of catchment similarity for HBV model parameters may be questioned.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abdulla F, Eshtawi T, Assaf H (2009) Assessment of the impact of potential climate change on the water balance of a semi-arid watershed. Water Resour Manag 23:2051–2068
Akhtar M, Ahmad N, Booij MJ (2008) The impact of climate change on the water resources of Hindukush–Karakorum–Himalaya region under different glacier coverage scenarios. J Hydrol 355:148–163
Akhtar M, Ahmad N, Booij MJ (2009) Use of regional climate model simulations as input for hydrological models for the Hindukush–Karakorum–Himalaya region. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:1075–1089
Ao T, Ishidaira H, Takeuchi K, Kiem AS, Yoshitari J, Fukami K, Magome J (2006) Relating BTOPMC model parameters to physical features of MOPEX basins. J Hydrol 320:84–102
BADC (2009) British atmospheric data centre. http://badc.nerc.ac.uk. Accessed 17 November 2009
Bergström S (1990) Parameter values for the HBV model in Sweden (in Swedish). Technical Report no. 28. SMHI, Norrköping
Bergström S (1995) The HBV model. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp 443–476
Beven K, Binley A (1992) The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6:279–298
Blöschl G, Sivapalan M (1995) Scale issues in hydrological modelling: a review. Hydrol Process 9:251–290
Booij MJ (2005) Impact of climate change on river flooding assessed with different spatial model resolutions. J Hydrol 303:176–198
CSI (2009) Catchment spatial information. http://www.ceh.ac.uk/data/nrfa/catchment_spatial_information.html. Accessed 17 November 2009
Cutore P, Cristaudo G, Campisano A, Modica C, Cancelliere A, Rossi G (2007) Regional models for the estimation of streamflow series in ungauged basins. Water Resour Manag 21:789–800
Data60UK (2009) Eleven-year records (1980–1990) of continuous daily catchment precipitation and mean streamflow for 61 catchments throughout England and Wales. http://www.nwl.ac.uk/ih/nrfa/pub/index.html. Accessed 17 November 2009
De Vos NJ, Rientjes THM (2007) Multi-objective performance comparison of an artificial neural network and a conceptual rainfall–runoff model. Hydrol Sci J 52:397–413
De Vos NJ, Rientjes THM (2008) Multi-objective training of artificial neural networks for rainfall–runoff modeling. Water Resour Res 44:W08434
Diermanse FLM (2001) Physically based modelling of rainfall–runoff processes. PhD thesis. Delft University Press, Delft
Duan Q, Schaake J, Andréassian V, Franks S, Goteti G, Gupta HV, Gusev YM, Habets F, Hall A, Hay L, Hogue T, Huang M, Leavesley G, Liang X, Nasonova ON, Noilhan J, Oudin L, Sorooshian S, Wagener T, Wood EF (2006) Model parameter estimation experiment (MOPEX): an overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops. J Hydrol 320:3–17
Engeland K, Hisdal H (2009) A comparison of low flow estimates in ungauged catchments using regional regression and the HBV-model. Water Resour Manag 23:2567–2586
Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO (1998) Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and noncommensurable measures of information. Water Resour Res 34:751–763
Gupta HV, Wagener T, Liu Y (2008) Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation. Hydrol Process 22:3802–3813
Haberlandt U, Klöcking B, Krysanova V, Becker A (2001) Regionalisation of the base flow index from dynamically simulated flow components—a case study in the Elbe River Basin. J Hydrol 248:35–53
Harlin J, Kung C (1992) Parameter uncertainty and simulation of design floods in Sweden. J Hydrol 137:209–230
Hundecha Y, Bárdossy A (2004) Modelling of the effect of land use change on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model. J Hydrol 292:281–295
Jakeman AJ, Hornberger GM (1993) How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall–runoff model? Water Resour Res 29:2637–2649
Jakeman AJ, Littlewood IG, Whitehead PG (1990) Computation of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and identifiable component flows with application to two small upland catchments. J Hydrol 117:275–300
Kay AL, Jones DA, Crooks SM, Calver A, Reynard NS (2006) A comparison of three approaches to spatial generalization of rainfall–runoff models. Hydrol Process 20:3953–3973
Killingtveit A, Sælthun NR (1995) Hydropower development: hydrology. Technical report. Norwegian Institute of Technology, Oslo
Khu ST, Madsen H (2005) Multiobjective calibration with Pareto preference ordering: an application to rainfall–runoff model calibration. Water Resour Res 41:W03004
Klemeš V (1986) Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrol Sci J 31:13–24
Kokkonen T, Jakeman A, Young P, Koivusalo H (2003) Predicting daily flows in ungauged catchments: model regionalization from catchment descriptors at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina. Hydrol Process 17:2219–2238
Lidén R, Harlin J (2000) Analysis of conceptual rainfall–runoff modelling performance in different climates. J Hydrol 238:231–247
Lindström G, Johansson B, Persson M, Gardelin M, Bergström S (1997) Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model. J Hydrol 201:272–288
Madsen H (2000) Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model using multiple objectives. J Hydrol 235:276–288
McIntyre N, Lee H, Wheater H, Young A (2005) Ensemble predictions of runoff in ungauged catchments. Water Resour Res 41:W12434
Merz R, Blöschl G (2004) Regionalisation of catchment model parameters. J Hydrol 287:95–123
Moore RJ (1985) The probability-distributed principle and runoff production at point and basin scales. Hydrol Sci J 30:273–297
Moore RJ (1999) Real-time flood forecasting systems: perspectives and prospects. In: Casale R, Margottini C (eds) Floods and landslides: integrated risk assessment. Springer, Berlin, pp 147–189
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I - A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290
NRFA (2009) National River Flow Archive. http://www.ceh.ac.uk/data/nrfa/index.html. Accessed 17 November 2009
Oudin L, Andréassian V, Perrin C, Michel C, Le Moine N (2008) Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: a comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments. Water Resour Res 44:W03413
Parajka J, Blöschl G, Merz R (2007) Regional calibration of catchment models: potential for ungauged catchments. Water Resour Res 43:W06406
Sefton CEM, Boorman DB (1997) A regional investigation of climate change impacts on UK streamflows. J Hydrol 195:26–44
Sefton CEM, Howarth SM (1998) Relationships between dynamic response characteristics and physical descriptors of catchments in England and Wales. J Hydrol 211:1–16
Seibert J (1997) Estimation of parameter uncertainty in the HBV model. Nord Hydrol 28:4–5
Seibert J (1999) Regionalisation of parameters for a conceptual rainfall–runoff model. Agric For Meteorol 98–99:279–293
Shaw EM (1994) Hydrology in practice, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London
Sivapalan M, Takeuchi K, Franks SW, Gupta VK, Karambiri H, Lakshmi V, Liang X, McDonnell JJ, Mendiondo EM, O’Connell PE, Oki T, Pomeroy JW, Schertzer D, Uhlenbrook S, Zehe E (2003) IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003-2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrol Sci J 48:857–880
SMHI (1999) Integrated hydrologic modelling system (IHMS). Manual version 4.3. SMHI, Norrköping
Strahler AN (1952) Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geol Soc Amer Bull 63:1117–1141
Tang Y, Reed P, Wagener T (2006) How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrological model calibration? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:289–307
Velner RGJ (2000) Rainfall–runoff modelling of the Ourthe catchment with the HBV model. A study for extension of the lead time for flood forecasting in the Meuse (in Dutch). RIZA working document 2000.091X. Wageningen University, Wageningen
Verbunt M, Zwaaftink MG, Gurtz J (2005) The hydrological impact of land cover changes and hydropower stations in the Alpine Rhine basin. Ecol Model 187:71–84
Wagener T, Wheater HS (2006) Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall–runoff models including uncertainty. J Hydrol 320:132–154
Wagener T, Lees MJ, Wheater HS (2002) A toolkit for the development and application of parsimonious hydrological models. In: Singh VP, Frevert D (eds) Mathematical models of large watershed hydrology, vol 1. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp 87–136
Wagener T, Wheater HS, Gupta HV (2003) Identification and evaluation of watershed models. In: Duan Q, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Rousseau AN, Turcotte R (eds) Calibration of watershed models. Water Science and Application 6, American Geophysical Union, pp 29–47
Wale A, Rientjes THM, Gieske ASM, Getachew HA (2009) Ungauged catchment contributions to Lake Tana’s water balance. Hydrol Process 23:3682–3693
Yadav M, Wagener T, Gupta H (2007) Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins. Adv Water Resour 30:1756–1774
Yapo PO, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S (1998) Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models. J Hydrol 204:83–97
Young AR (2006) Stream flow simulation within UK ungauged catchments using a daily rainfall–runoff model. J Hydrol 320:155–172
Zhang YQ, Chiew FHS (2009) Relative merits of different methods for runoff predictions in ungauged catchments. Water Resour Res 45:W07412
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Deckers, D.L.E.H., Booij, M.J., Rientjes, T.H.M. et al. Catchment Variability and Parameter Estimation in Multi-Objective Regionalisation of a Rainfall–Runoff Model. Water Resour Manage 24, 3961–3985 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9642-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9642-8