Skip to main content
Log in

Social Networks as Trojan Horses to Challenge the Dominance of Existing Hierarchies: Knowledge and Learning in the Water Governance of Volos, Greece

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In context of the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive, conventional hierarchies and dominant logics in the metropolitan area of Volos, Greece, are challenged indirectly, in a “Trojan-horse” like way. The basic characteristic of the water sector in Volos Urban Area is the absolute dominance of centralized services (Municipal Enterprise for Water and Sewage). However, the intense interest of new actors (private companies, NGOs, University and Research Institutes, etc.) has led to the establishment of an informal and voluntary social network. The paper evaluates the role of an informal social network as a new form of governance in the framework of spatial development that has emerged in the shadow of an existing hierarchy. The basic issues highlighted are:

  • The challenge to hierarchical decision making structures in the water sector through an informal and voluntary social network.

  • The learning processes and knowledge forms that new actors bring to and acquire in such forms of network practices (e.g. contribution to public awareness, mobilisation of local knowledge).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger T, Birner R, Díaz J, McCarthy N, Wittmer H (2007) Capturing the complexity of water uses and water users within a multi-agent framework. Water Resour Manag 21:129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Stern PC (ed) (2008) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Panel on public participation in environmental assessment and decision making, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Division of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Education. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimadama Z (2008) Economy, development and environment. Theoretical approaches and sustainable development policies. Papazisis Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002a) European governance: a white paper, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/governance/docs/index_en.htm. Accessed 12 December 2008

  • European Commission (2002b) Guidance on public participation in relation to the water framework directive: active involvement, consultation, and public access to information. Guidance document on public participation. http://www.eau2015-rhin-meuse.fr/fr/ressources/ documents/guide_participation-public.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2008

  • Friedrich D (2007) Old wine in new bottles? The actual and potential contribution of civil society organizations to democratic governance in Europe, RECON working paper 2007/08. http://www.unizar.es/euroconstitucion/Treaties/Library%20(Since%20June%202007/Friedrich%202007.pdf. Accessed 22 September 2009

  • Getimis P, Dimadama Z (2003) Environmental management and policies: the Greek case studies. In: Heinelt H, Smith R (ed) Sustainability, innovation and participatory governance. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 165–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Getimis P, Bithas K, Zikos D (2001) Key actors, institutional framework and participatory procedures, for the Sustainable use of water in Attica-basin. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on environmental science and technology, Syros: University of Aegean, pp 243–252. http://www.zikos.eu/hydrorama2002final.pdf. Accessed 05 January 2010

  • Hau M, Heinelt H (2005) How to achieve governability at the local level? In: Hau M, Heinelt H, Stewart M (eds) Urban governance and democracy. Routledge, London, pp 12–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt H, Niederhafner St (2008) Cities and organized interest intermediation in the EU multi-level system. Eur Urban Reg Stud 15:173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt H, Malek T, Smith R, Töller A (2001) European union environment policy and new forms of governance. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt H, Getimis P, Kafkalas G, Smith R, Swyngedouw E (2002) Participatory governance in multi level context. Concepts and experience. Leske+Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt H, Sweeting D, Getimis P (2005) Legitimacy and urban governance: a cross-national comparative study. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Intermediaries (2005) New intermediary services and the transformation of urban water supply and wastewater disposal systems in Europe, EVK1-CT-2002-00115, carried out in the 5th Framework Research and Technological Development Program of the Commission of the European Communities, coordinated by Timothy Moss, Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, Erkner, Germany. http://orbit.dtu.dk/All.external?recid=185345. Accessed 22 June 2008

  • Lewis D, Ehsan K (1996) Guidelines towards promoting ‘active’ inter-agency partnerships in sustainable developments: lessons from an aquaculture project in Bangladesh. Unpublished report to the UK Overseas Development Administration, Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London

  • Lister S (1998) Power in partnership? An analysis of an NGO’s relationships with its partners. CVO International Working Paper Number 5. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CCS/pdf/IWP/int-work-paper5.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2009

  • Matthiesen UB, Bürkner HJ (2004) Wissensmilieus-Zur sozialen Konstruktion und analytischen Rekonstruktion eines neuen Sozialraum-Typus In: Matthiesen UB (ed) Stadtregion und Wissen. Analysen und Plädoyers für eine wissensbasierte Stadtpolitik, Wiesbaden, pp 65–89

  • Mayntz R (1993) Governing failures and the problem of governability: some comments on a theoretical paradigm. In: Kooiman J (ed) In modern governance: new government—society interactions. Sage, London, pp 45–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Medd W, Marvin E (2008) Making water work: intermediating between regional strategy and local practice. Environ Plann D Soc Space 26(2):280–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medd W, Moss T, Hoffman B, Beveridge R (2004) Conceptualisation of intermediaries: guidance papers, WP3 guidance internal document of “Intermediary Services and the transformation of urban water supply and wastewater disposal systems in Europe” research project (EVK1-CT- 2002-00115)

  • Mostert E (2003) Public participation and the European water framework directive: a framework for analysis, February 2003, RBA Centre, Delft, University of Technology. http://www.harmonicop.uni-osnabrueck.de/_files/_down/HarmoniCOPinception.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2009

  • Mostert E, Pahl-WostlC (2003) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(2):5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transition towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manag 21(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRB (2007) Pilot river basin activity report phase II: 2005–2006 water framework directive implementation pilot activities—key challenges and recommendations from the pilot river basins. Report prepared by pilot river basins, European Commission, DG Environment and the Joint Research Centre, 13 June 2007. http://www.enmar.org/sites/home/news/download/2007-06-13_report_pilot_river_basins_en.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2010

  • Rauschmayer F, Wittmer H, Paavola J (2007) Multi-level governance of natural resources: tools and processes for water and biodiversity governance in Europe—a European research and training network, UFZ discussion paper, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, GoverNat 1, March 2007, Leipzig. http://www.governat.eu/files/files/ufz_diskussion_papers.pdf. Accessed 18 February 2010

  • Rauschmayer F, Berghöfer A, Omann I, Zikos D (2009) Examining processes or outcomes? Evaluation concepts in European Governance of natural resources. Environmental Policy and Governance 19(3):159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter PC (2002) Participatory governance arrangements: is there any reason to expect it will achieve; sustainable and innovation policies in a multilevel context?’ In: Crote J, Gbikpi B (ed) Participatory governance: political and social implications. Leske+Budrich, Opladen, pp 51–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans J (2009) Interactive actor analysis for rural water management in The Netherlands: an application of the transactional approach. Water Resour Manag 23:1211–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zikos D, Bithas K (2006) The case of a “weak water governance model: Athens, Greece. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IASME/WSEAS international conference on water resources, hydraulics and hydrology. WSEAS, Chalkida, pp 161–166, May 11–13, 2006. http://zikos.110mb.com/516-372.pdf. Accessed 17 February 2010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zefi Dimadama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dimadama, Z., Zikos, D. Social Networks as Trojan Horses to Challenge the Dominance of Existing Hierarchies: Knowledge and Learning in the Water Governance of Volos, Greece. Water Resour Manage 24, 3853–3870 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9637-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9637-5

Keywords

Navigation