Skip to main content
Log in

Establishing a Multi-scale Stream Gaging Network in the Whitewater River Basin, Kansas, USA

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigating the routing of streamflow through a large drainage basin requires the determination of discharge at numerous locations in the channel network. Establishing a dense network of stream gages using conventional methods is both cost-prohibitive and functionally impractical for many research projects. We employ herein a previously tested, fluid-mechanically based model for generating rating curves to establish a stream gaging network in the Whitewater River basin in south-central Kansas. The model was developed for the type of channels typically found in this watershed, meaning that it is designed to handle deep, narrow geomorphically stable channels with irregular planforms, and can model overbank flow over a vegetated floodplain. We applied the model to ten previously ungaged stream reaches in the basin, ranging from third- to sixth-order channels. At each site, detailed field measurements of the channel and floodplain morphology, bed and bank roughness, and vegetation characteristics were used to quantify the roughness for a range of flow stages, from low flow to overbank flooding. Rating curves that relate stage to discharge were developed for all ten sites. Both fieldwork and modeling were completed in less than 2 years during an anomalously dry period in the region, which underscores an advantage of using theoretically based (as opposed to empirically based) discharge estimation techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aber JS (1991) Surficial geology of butler county, Kansas, final report: Kansas Geological Survey, open-file report 1991–48, 31 pp

  • Aber JS (1994) Geologic map, Butler County: Kansas Geological Survey, Map M-30

  • Alonso CV, Bingner RL (2000) Goodwin creek experimental watershed: a unique field laboratory. J Hydraul Eng 126(3):174–177. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2000)126:3(174)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn J, Hicks FE (2002) Combined flood routing and flood level forecasting. Can J Civ Eng 29(1):64–75. doi:10.1139/l01-079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boorman D, Williams R, Hutchins M, Penning E, Groot S, Icke J (2007) A model selection protocol to support the use of models for water management. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11(1):634–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan TJ, Somers WP (1969) Discharge measurements at gaging stations. US Geological Survey, Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, Book 3, Chapter A8, 65 pp

  • Clayton JA, Pitlick J (2007) Spatial and temporal variations in bed load transport intensity in a gravel-bed river bend. Water Resour Res 43:W024626. doi:10.1029/2006WR005253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A (2009) Reverse stream flow routing by using Muskingum models. Sadhana 34(3):483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbies MH, Aust WM, Burger JA, Adams MB (2007) Forest operations, extreme flooding events, and considerations for hydrologic modeling in the Appalachians: a review. For Ecol Manag 242:77–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmett WW, Wolman MG (2001) Effective discharge and gravel-bed rivers. Earth Surf Processes Landf 26:1369–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeland K, Hisdal H (2009) A comparison of low flow estimates in ungauged catchments using regional regression and the HBV-model. Water Resour Manag 23:2567–2586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks S, Sivipalan M, Takeuchi K, Tachikawa Y (2005) Predictions in ungauged basins: IAHS proceedings and reports. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, UK, 360 pp

  • Gupta VK (2005) Evolution of the Hydro-Kansas Research Program to test two integrative scaling hypotheses in the Whitewater Basin, Kansas. Eos Trans AGU 86(52):Abstract H31J-01

  • Gupta VK, Troutman BM, Dawdy DR (2007) Towards a nonlinear geophysical theory of floods in river networks: an overview of 20 years of progress. In: Tsonis AA, Elsner JB (ed) Nonlinear dynamics in geosciences. New York, Springer, pp 121–151

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guzha AC, Hardy TB (2009) Application of the distributed hydrological model, TOPNET, to the Big Darby Creek watershed, Ohio, USA. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9482-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Hack JT (1960) Interpretation of erosional topography in humid temperate regions. Am J Sci 258(A):80–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Juracek KE, Fitzpatrick FA (2009) Geomorphic applications of stream-gage information. River Res Appl 25:329–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang RS, Marston RA (2006) Geomorphic effects of rural-to-urban land use conversion on three streams in the Central Redbed Plains of Oklahoma. Geomorphology 79:488–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kean JW, Smith JD (2005) Generation and verification of theoretical rating curves in the Whitewater River basin, Kansas. J Geophys Res 110:F04012. doi:10.1029/2004JF000250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kean JW, Smith JD (2006a) Form drag in rivers due to small-scale natural topographic features: 1. Regular sequences. J Geophys Res 111:F04009. doi:10.1029/2006JF000467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kean JW, Smith JD (2006b) Form drag in rivers due to small-scale natural topographic features: 2. Irregular sequences. J Geophys Res 111:F04010. doi:10.1029/2006JF000490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski WF, Lakshmi V, Georgakakos KP, Jain SC (1991) A Monte Carlo study of rainfall sampling effect on a distributed catchment model. Water Resour Res 27(1):119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loescher HW, Jacobs JM, Wendroth O, Robinson DA, Poulos GS, McGuire K, Reed P, Mohanty BP, Shanley JB, Krajewski W (2007) Enhancing water cycle measurements for future hydrologic research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:669–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantilla R, Gupta VJ, Mesa OJ (2006) Role of coupled flow dynamics and real network structures on Hortonian scaling of peak flows. J Hydrol 322:155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantilla R, Cunha L, Krajewski WF, Kruger A, Gupta VK (2008) A top-down guided hydrologic instrumentation in Kansas to test scaling of peak flows in real basins. Eos Trans AGU 89(23):Abstract H31C-03

  • McDonald RR, Nelson JM, Bennett JP (2005) Multi-dimensional surface-water modeling system user’s guide: U.S. Geological Survey techniques and methods 6-B2:136

  • Mobley J, Rajaram H, Furey PR, Milne BT (2005) Preliminary conceptual model of groundwater level response to evapotranspiration in the Whitewater Basin, Kansas. Eos Trans AGU 86(52):Abstract H31J-03

  • Moussa R, Bocquillon C (1996) Criteria for the choice of flood-routing methods in natural channels. J Hydrol 186(1–4):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell E, Ewen J, O’Donnell G, Quinn P (2007) Is there a link between agricultural land-use management and flooding? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11(1):96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters NE, Freer J, Aulenbach BT (2003) Hydrological dynamics of the Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia. Groundwater 41(7):973–988

    Google Scholar 

  • Price RK (1974) Comparison of four numerical methods for flood routing. ASCE J Hydraul Div 100(7):879–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldo A, Banavar JR, Maritan A (2006) Trees, networks, and hydrology. Water Resour Res 42:W06D07. doi:10.1029/2005WR004108

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JS, Sivapalan M, Snell JD (1995) On the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments. Water Resour Res 31(12):3089–3101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1973) Geomorphic thresholds and complex response of drainage systems. In: Morisawa M (ed) Fluvial geomorphology. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Geom. Symposia Series, Binghampton, NY, pp 299–310

  • Shrestha R, Tachikawa Y, Takara K (2006) Input data resolution analysis for distributed hydrological modeling. J Hydrol 319:36–50. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapalan M, Takeuchi K, Frank SW, Gupta VK, Karambiri H, Lakshmi V, Liang X, McDonnell JJ, Mendiondo EM, O’Connell PE, Oki T, Pomeroy JW, Schertzer D, Uhlenbrook S, Zehe E (2003) Decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003–2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrol Sci 48(6):857–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapragasam C, Muttil N (2005) Discharge rating curve extension—a new approach. Water Resour Manage 19:505–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sui J (2005) Estimation of design flood hydrograph for an ungauged watershed. Water Resour Manage 19:813–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewolde MH, Smithers JC (2006) Flood routing in ungauged catchments using Muskingum methods. Water SA 32(3):379–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkata RK, Eldho TI, Rao EP, Chithra NR (2008) A distributed kinematic wave-Philip infiltration watershed model using FEM, GIS and remotely sensed data. Water Resour Manage 22:737–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinmann PE, Laurenson EM (1979) Approximate flood routing methods: a review. ASCE J Hydraul Div 105(12):1521–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting PJ, Dietrich WE (1989) The roughness of alluvial surfaces: an empirical examination of the influence of size and heterogeneity and natural packing. Eos Trans AGU 70(43):1109

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolman MG (1954) A method of sampling coarse river-bed material. Trans AGU 35(6):951–956

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolman MG, Miller JP (1960) Magnitude and frequency of forces in geomorphic processes. J Geol 68:54–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav M, Wagener T, Gupta H (2007) Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins. Adv Water Resour 30:1756–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordan A. Clayton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clayton, J.A., Kean, J.W. Establishing a Multi-scale Stream Gaging Network in the Whitewater River Basin, Kansas, USA. Water Resour Manage 24, 3641–3664 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9624-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9624-x

Keywords

Navigation