Skip to main content
Log in

A Rough Set Based Model in Water Quality Analysis

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to pollution caused by the expansion of human activities and economic development, water quality has gradually deteriorated in many areas of the world. Therefore, analysis of water quality becomes one of the most essential issues of modern civilization. Integrated interdisciplinary modeling techniques, providing reliable, efficient, and accurate representation of the complex phenomenon of water quality, have gained attention in recent years. With the ability to deal with both numeric and nominal information, and express knowledge in a rule-based form, the Rough Set Theory (RST) has been successfully employed in many fields. However, the application of RST has not been widely investigated in water quality analysis. The reducts generated by RST models become very time-consuming as the size of the problem increases. Using multinomial logistics regression (MLR) techniques to provide reducts of RST models, this investigation develops a hybrid Multinomial Logistic Regression and Rough Set Theory (MLRRST) model to analyze relations between degrees of water pollution and environmental factors in Taiwan. Empirical results indicate that the MLRRST model could analyze water qualities efficiently and accurately, and yield decision rules for the staff of water quality management. Thus, the proposed model is a promising and helpful scheme in analyzing water quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou-Elela SI, Nasr FA, Ibrahim HS, Badr NM, Askalany ARM (2008) Pollution prevention pays off in a board paper mill. J Clean Prod 16:330–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera PA, Frensich AG, Torres JA, Castro H, Vidal JL, Canton M (2001) Application of the Kohonen neural network in coastal water management: methodological development for the assessment and prediction of water quality. Water Res 35:4053–4062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bello R, Nowe A, Caballero Y, Goméz Y, Vrancx P (2005) A model based on ant colony system and rough set theory to feature selection. In: Proceedings of the 2005 conference of genetic and evolutionary conference, 25–29, June 2005, Washington DC, USA, pp 275–276

  • Brtka V, Stotić E, Srdić B (2008) Automated extraction of decision rules for leptin dynamics—a rough sets approach. J Biomed Inform 41:667–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Hadi AS, Price B (2000) Regression analysis by example, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Li YS, Liu Z, Yin K, Li Z, Wai OWH, King B (2004) Integration of multi-source data for water quality classification in the Pearl River estuary and its adjacent coastal waters of Hong Kong. Cont Shelf Res 24:1827–1843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinatimes Foundation (2003) Taiwan River database. http://www.chinatimes.org.tw/features/river-new/rivers/river-bank.htm

  • Diamantopoulou MJ, Antonopoulos VZ, Papamichail DM (2007) Cascade correlation artificial neural networks for estimating missing monthly values of water quality parameters in rivers. Water Resour Manag 21:649–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitras AI, Slowinski R, Susmaga R, Zopounidis C (1999) Business failure prediction using rough sets. Eur J Oper Res 114(2):263–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djinovic JM, Popovic AR (2007) In situ influence of coal ash dump on the quality of neighboring surface and ground waters by applying correlation statistic analysis. Fuel 86:218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll CT, Driscoll KM, Mitchell MJ, Raynalc DJ (2003) Effects of acidic deposition on forest and aquatic ecosystems in New York State. Environ Pollut 123:327–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Executive Yuan, Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, R.O.C. (2007) National statistics. http://61.60.106.82/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.asp

  • Freitas AA, Lavington SH (1996) Speeding up knowledge discovery in large relational databases by means of a new discretization algorithm. In: Morrison R, Kennedy J (eds) Advances in databases: proceedings of the 14th British National Conference on Databases—BNCOD-14. LNCS, vol 1094. Springer, Berlin, pp 124–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin C (2000) ‘Waters’ or ‘water’?—master narratives in water history and their implications for contemporary water policy. Water Policy 2:313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedar AR, Wang J, Fukushima M (2008) Tabu search for attribute reduction in rough set theory. Soft Comput 12(9):909–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyun WY, Ditton RB (2006) Using multinomial logistic regression analysis to understand anglers willingness to substitute other fishing locations. In: Burns R, Robinson K (eds) Proceedings of the 2006 northeastern recreation research symposium, US Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Pennsylvania, USA, pp 248–255

  • Jensen R, Shen Q (2003) Finding rough set reducts with ant colony optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2003 UK workshop on computational intelligence, 1–3, September 2003, University of Bristol, UK, pp 15–22

  • Katko TS (1994) Water management in Finland. Eur Water Pollut Control 4(6):40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerber R (1992) ChiMerge: discretization of numeric attributes. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of artificial intelligence, 12–16, June 1992, AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Menlo Park, California, pp 123–128

  • Komarnisky LA, Christopherson RJ, Basu TK (2003) Sulfur: its clinical and toxicologic aspects. Nutr 19(1):54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kralisch S, Fink M, Flügel WA, Beckstein C (2003) A neural network approach for the optimisation of watershed management. Environ Model Softw 18:815–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo JT, Wang YY, Lung WS (2006) A hybrid neural-genetic algorithm for reservoir water quality management. Water Res 40:1367–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurunç A, Yürekli K, Çevil O (2005) Performance of two stochastic approaches for forecasting water quality and streamflow data from Yeşilirmak River, Turkey. Environ Model Softw 20:1195–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leentvar J (1997) The need of the human factor in integrated water management. Eur Water Pollut Control 7(3):30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou SM, Lo SL, Hu CY (2003) Application of two-stage fuzzy set theory to river quality evaluation in Taiwan. Water Res 37:1406–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier HR, Morgan N, Chow CWK (2004) Use of artificial neural networks for predicting optimal alum doses and treated water quality parameters. Environ Model Softw 19:485–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manache G, Melching CS (2008) Identification of reliable regression- and correlation-based sensitivity measures for importance ranking of water-quality model parameters. Environ Model Softw 23:549–562

    Google Scholar 

  • May RJ, Dandy GC, Maier HR, Nixon JB (2008) Application of partial mutual information variable selection to ANN forecasting of water quality in water distribution systems. Environ Model Softw 23:1289–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell MK, Stapp WB, Bixby K (2000) Field manual for water quality monitoring: an environmental education program for schools. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque

    Google Scholar 

  • Mushrif MM, Ray AK (2008) Color image segmentation: rough-set theoretic approach. Pattern Recognit Lett 29:483–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakano T, Tayasu I, Yachi S, Yamada Y, Hosono T, Igeta A, Hyodo F, Ando A, Saitoh Y, Tanaka T, Wada E (2008) Effect of agriculture on water quality of Lake Biwa tributaries. Sci Total Environ 389:132–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen SH, Skowron A (1995) Quantization of real value attributes: rough set and Boolean reasoning approaches. In: Wang PP (ed) Proceedings of the international workshop of rough sets and soft computing at second joint conference on information sciences. Elsevier, New York, pp 34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets: theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (2002) Rough sets and intelligent data analysis. Inf Sci 147:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH (2009) An inexact chance-constrained quadratic programming model for stream water quality management. Water Resour Manag 23:661–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainz A, Grande JA, de la Torre ML (2003) Odiel River, acid mine drainage and current characterisation by means of univariate analysis. Environ Int 29:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchis A, Segovia MJ, Gil JA, Heras A, Vilar JL (2007) Rough sets and the role of the monetary policy in financial stability (macroeconomic problem) and the prediction of insolvency in insurance sector (microeconomic problem). Eur J Oper Res 181(3):1554–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanmuganathan S, Sallis P, Buckeridge J (2006) Self-organising map methods in integrated modelling of environmental and economic systems. Environ Model Softw 21:1247–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha S, Kazama F (2007) Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environ Model Softw 22:464–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikder IU, Gangopadhyay A (2007) Managing uncertainty in location services using rough set and evidence theory. Expert Syst Appl 32(2):386–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AP, Ghosh SK, Sharma P (2007) Water quality management of a stretch of river Yamuna. An interactive fuzzy multi-objective approach. Water Resour Manag 21:515–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skowron A, Rauser C (1992) The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems. In: Slowinski R (ed) Intelligent decision support. Handbook of applications and advances of the rough sets theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 331–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Taiwan Environmental Law Library (2003) Water pollution control act. http://law.epa.gov.tw/en/laws/717336547.html

  • Tsumoto S (2000) Knowledge discovery in clinical databases and evaluation of discovered knowledge in outpatient clinic. Inf Sci 124(1–4):125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Yang J, Jensen R, Liu X (2006) Rough set feature selection and rule induction for prediction of malignancy degree in brain glioma. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 83:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Yang J, Teng X, Xia W, Jenson R (2007) Feature selection based on rough sets and particle swarm optimization. Pattern Recognit Lett 28:459–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Resource Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs (2006) The inquiry and supply system of water resources data. http://gweb.wra.gov.tw/wrweb/

  • Witlox F, Tindemans H (2004) The application of rough sets analysis in activity-based modeling. Opportunities and constraints. Expert Syst Appl 27(4):585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HH, Liu TC, Lin YT (2007) Applying rough sets to prevent customer complaints for IC packaging foundry. Expert Syst Appl 32(1):151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping-Feng Pai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pai, PF., Lee, FC. A Rough Set Based Model in Water Quality Analysis. Water Resour Manage 24, 2405–2418 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9558-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9558-3

Keywords

Navigation