Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chance Constrained Optimal Design of Composite Channels Using Meta-Heuristic Techniques

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimal design of irrigation channels has an important role in planning and management of irrigation projects. The input parameters used in design of irrigation channels are prone to uncertainty and may result in failure of channels. To improve the overall reliability and cost effectiveness, optimal design of composite channels is performed as a chance constrained problem in this study. The models are developed to minimize the total cost, while satisfying the specified probability of the channel capacity being greater than the design flow. The formulated model leads to a highly non-linear and non-convex optimization problem having multimodal behavior. In this paper, the usefulness of two meta-heuristic search algorithms such as Genetic Algorithms (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) are investigated to obtain the optimal solutions. Two site specific cases of restricted top width and restricted flow depth are also analyzed. It is found that both the algorithms performing quite well in giving optimal solutions and handling the additional constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balter AM, Fontane DG (2008) Use of multi-objective particle swarm optimization in water resources management. J Water Resour Plan Manage 134(3):257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjya RK (2006) Optimal design of open channel section incorporating critical flow condition. J Irrig Drain Eng 2(5):513–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjya RK, Satish MG (2008) Flooding probability based optimal design of trapezoidal open channel using freeboard as design variable. J Irrig Drain Eng 134(3):405–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT (1959) Open channel hydraulics. Mc-Graw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. Mc-Graw Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Das A (2000) Optimal channel cross section with composite roughness. J Irrig Drain Eng 126(1):68–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A (2007) Flooding probability constrained optimal design of trapezoidal channels. J Irrig Drain Eng 133(1):53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A (2008) Chance constrained optimal design of trapezoidal canals. J Water Resour Plan Manage 134(3):310–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Easa SM (1992) Probabilistic design of open channels. J Irrig Drain Eng 118(6):868–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easa SM (1994) Reliability analysis of open drainage channels under multiple failure modes. J Irrig Drain Eng 120(6):1007–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich DC (1994) Width and depth constrained best trapezoidal section. J Irrig Drain Eng 120(4):828–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Wiley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould NIM, Orban D, Toint PL (2005) Numerical methods for large-scale nonlinear optimization. Acta Numerica 14:299–361. doi:10.1017/S0962492904000248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo CY, Hughes WC (1984) Optimal channel cross section with freeboard. J Irrig Drain Eng 110(3):304–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbour

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1933) Separate roughness coefficients for channel bottom and sides. Eng News-Rec 111(22):652–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain A, Bhattacharya RK, Sanaga S (2004) Optimal design of composite channels using Genetic Algorithm. J Irrig Drain Eng 130(4):286–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janga Reddy M, Nagesh Kumar D (2006) Optimal reservoir operation using multi objective evolutionary algorithm. Water Resour Manag 20(6):861–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janga Reddy M, Nagesh Kumar D (2007) Optimal reservoir operation for irrigation of multiple crops using elitist mutated particle swarm optimization. Hydrol Sci J 52(4):686–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janga Reddy M, Nagesh Kumar D (2009) Performance evaluation of elitist-mutated multi-objective particle swarm optimization for integrated water resources management. J Hydroinform 11(1):78–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung BS, Karney BW (2006) Hydraulic optimization of transient protection devices using GA and PSO approaches. J Water Resour Plan Manage 132(1):44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proc IEEE Int Conf Neural Netw 14:1942–1948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL, Mays LW (1986) Hydraulic uncertainties in flood levee capacity. J Hydraul Eng 112(10):928–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loganathan GV (1991) Optimal design of parabolic channels. J Irrig Drain Eng 117(5):716–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan S, Vijayalakshmi DP (2008) Estimation of Nash’s IUH parameters using stochastic search algorithms. Hydrol Process 22:3507–3522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monadjemi P (1994) General formulations of best hydraulic channel sections. J Irrig Drain Eng 120(1):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo I, Isquierdo J, Perez R, Tung MM (2008) Particle swarm optimization applied to the design of water supply systems. Comp Math Appl 56(3):769–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagesh Kumar D, Janga Reddy M (2007) Multi purpose reservoir operation using particle swarm optimization. J Water Resour Plan Manage 133(3):192–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira R, Loucks DP (1997) Operating rules for multi reservoir systems. Water Resour Res 33(4):839–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli R (2008) Analysis of publications on the applications of Particle Swarm Optimization. J Artif Evol Appl 2008:1–10. doi:10.1155/2008/685175

    Google Scholar 

  • Savic DA, Walters GA (1997) Genetic Algorithms for least cost design of water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plan Manage 123(2):67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suribabu C, Neelakantan T (2006) Design of water distribution networks using particle swarm optimization. Urban Water 3(2):111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trout TJ (1982) Channel design to minimize lining material costs. J Irrig Drain Eng 108(4):242–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung YK, Mays LW (1980) Risk analysis for hydraulic design. J Hydraul Div 106(HY5):893–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang QJ (1991) The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall runoff models. Water Resour Res 27(9):246–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw R, Sharif M (1999) Evaluation of genetic algorithms for optimal reservoir system operation. J Water Resour Plan Manage 125(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Janga Reddy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janga Reddy, M., Adarsh, S. Chance Constrained Optimal Design of Composite Channels Using Meta-Heuristic Techniques. Water Resour Manage 24, 2221–2235 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9548-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9548-5

Keywords

Navigation