Water Resources Management

, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp 1965–1988 | Cite as

Simulation-Optimization Modeling of Conjunctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater

  • Hamid R. Safavi
  • Fatemeh Darzi
  • Miguel A. Mariño
Article

Abstract

Water resources management in semiarid regions with low precipitation and high potential of evapotranspiration is a great challenge for managers and decision makers. In those regions, both sources of water should be managed conjunctively so as to minimize shortages of water in dry seasons. In conjunctive use, the difficulty increases as one must represent the response of both systems interactions, and develop management strategies that simultaneously address surface water and aquifer regulation. This paper focuses on the simulation-optimization for conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater on a basin-wide scale, the Najafabad plain in west-central Iran. A trained artificial neural network model is developed as a simulator of surface water and groundwater interaction while a genetic algorithm is developed as the optimization model. The main goal of the simulation-optimization model is to minimize shortages in meeting irrigation demands for three irrigation systems subject to constraints on the control of cumulative drawdown of the underlying water table and maximum capacity of surface irrigation systems. To achieve the main goal, three scenarios are presented. Results of the proposed model demonstrate the importance of the conjunctive use approach for planning the management of water resources in semiarid regions.

Keywords

Surface water Groundwater Conjunctive use Semiarid regions Optimization Simulation, Genetic algorithm Artificial neural network 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aron G (1969) Optimization of conjunctively managed surface and ground water resources by dynamic programming. Contribution no. 129. Water Resources Center, University of California, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  2. Afshar A, Zahraei SA, Mariño MA (2008) Cyclic storage design and operation optimization: hybrid GA decomposition approach. Internat Jour Civil Engrg 6(1):34–47Google Scholar
  3. Barlow PM (1997) Dynamic models for conjunctive management of stream-aquifer systems of glaciated Northeast. PhD dissertation, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CTGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow PM, Ahlfeld DP, Dickerman DC (2003) Conjunctive-management models for sustained yield of stream-aquifer systems. J Water Resour Plan Manage 129(1):35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basagaoglu H, Mariño MA (1999) Joint management of surface and ground water supplies. Ground Water 37(2):214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basagaoglu H, Mariño MA, Shumway RH (1999) δ-form approximating problem for a conjunctive water resource management model. Adv Water Resour 23:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattacharjya RK, Datta B (2005) Optimal management of coastal aquifers using linked simulation optimization approach. Water Resour Manage 19:295–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buras N (1963) Conjunctive operation of dams and aquifers. J Hydraul 89(6):111–131Google Scholar
  9. Chavez-Morales J, Mariño MA, Holzapfel EA (1985) Planning model of irrigation district. J Irrig Drain Eng 113(4):549–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coskunoglu O, Shetty CM (1981) Optimal stream-aquifer development. J Water Resour Plan Manage 107(2):513–531Google Scholar
  11. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Dreizin YC, Haimes YY (1977) A hierarchy of response functions for ground water management. Water Resour Res 13(1):78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elmangnouni S, Treichel W (1994) A multicriterion approach to groundwater management. Water Resour Res 30(6):1881–1895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FAO (1992) CROPWAT—a computer program for irrigation planning and management. FAO irrigation and drainage paper no. 46. Food and Agriculture organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldberg DE (2000) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and in machine learning. Addison–Wiley, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorelick SM (1983) A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods. Water Resour Res 19(2):305–319Google Scholar
  17. Haimes YY, Dreizin YC (1977) Management of groundwater and surface water via decomposition. Water Resour Res 13(1):69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hantush MSM, Mariño MA (1989) Chance-constrained model for management of stream-aquifer system. J Water Resour Plan Manage 115(3):259–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harbaugh AW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG (2000) MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular groundwater model. Report no. 00-92. US Geological Survey, Denver, COGoogle Scholar
  20. Isfahan Regional Water Authority (2005) Zayandehrood River Basin report. IRWA, Isfahan (in Persian)Google Scholar
  21. Jamab Consulting Engineers (2002) Water resources planning in Zayandehrood River Basin. JCE, Tehran (in Persian)Google Scholar
  22. Karamouz M, Kerachian R, Zahraie B, Zahraie B (2002) Conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater resources. In: Proc. ASCE environ and water resour institute conf. (CD-ROM), Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  23. Louie PWF, Yeh WWG, Hsu NS (1984) Multiobjective water resources management planning. J Water Resour Plan Manage 110(1):39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maddock T III (1972) Algebraic technological function from a simulation model. Water Resour Res 8(1):129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maddock T III (1973) Management model as a tool for studying the worth of data. Water Resour Res 9(2):270–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mariño MA (2001) Conjunctive management of surface water and groundwater. In: Schumann AH et al (eds) Regional management of water resources. IAHS Publ 268. IAHS, Wallingford, pp 165–173Google Scholar
  27. Matsukawa J, Finney BA, Willis R (1992) Conjunctive use planning in Mad river basin. J Water Resour Plan Manage 118(2):115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morel-Seytoux HJ (1975) A simple case of conjunctive surface ground water management. Ground Water 10(6):506–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nieswand GH, Granstorm ML (1971) A chance constrained approach to the conjunctive use of surface waters and ground waters. Water Resour Res 7(6):1425–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Mara GT, Duloy JH (1984) Modeling efficient water allocation in a conjunctive use regime. The Indus basin of Pakistan. Water Resour Res 20(11):1489–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Onta PR, Gupta AD, Harboe R (1991) Multistep planning model for conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources. J Water Resour Plann Manage 117(6):662–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paudyal GN, Gupta AD (1990) Irrigation planning by multilevel optimization. J Irrig Drainage Eng ASCE 116(2):273–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Provencher B, Burt O (1994) Approximating the optimal ground water pumping policy in a multiaquifer stochastic conjunctive use setting. Water Resour Res 30(3):833–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rogers P, Smith DV (1970) The integrated use of ground and surface water in irrigation project planning. Am J Agric Econ 52(1):13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Safavi HR, Bahreini GR (2009) Conjunctive simulation of surface water and groundwater resources under uncertainty. Iran J Sci Technol Trans B 33(B1):79–94Google Scholar
  36. Safavi HR, Afshar A, Mariño MA (2002) Integrated water resources management: a complex challenge. In: Proc. 6th internat conf. on civil eng. Isfahan, Iran, pp 305–312Google Scholar
  37. Sally H, Murray-Rust H, Mamanpoush AR, Akbari M (2001) Water supply and demand in four major irrigation systems in Zayandehrood Basin, IAERI-IWMI, Isfahan, IranGoogle Scholar
  38. Sethi LN, Kumar DN, Panda SN, Chandramal B (2002) Optimal crop planning and conjunctive use of water resources in a costal river. Water Resour Manage 16:145–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vasan A, Raju KS (2009) Comparative analysis of simulated annealing, simulated quenching and genetic algorithms for optimal reservoir operation. Appl Soft Comput 9:274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vedula S, Mujumdar PP, Chandra Sekhar G (2005) Conjunctive use modeling for multicrop irrigation. Agric Water Manag 73:193–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang M, Zheng M (1998) Groundwater management optimization using genetic algorithms and simulated annealing: formulation and comparison. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(3):519–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Willis R, Finney BA, Zhang D (1989) Water resources management in north China plain. J Water Resour Plan Manage 115(5):598–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yu W, Haimes YY (1974) Multilevel optimization for conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water. Water Resour Res 10(4):625–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamid R. Safavi
    • 1
  • Fatemeh Darzi
    • 1
  • Miguel A. Mariño
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations