Abstract
A risk-based evaluation is performed for meeting future water demands in the Brahmaputra Floodplain Area within Bangladesh (BFA). This evaluation is carried out using three risk-based performance indicators: reliability, resiliency and vulnerability. The vulnerability indicator has been redefined incorporating the aspect of a supply failure. The analysis includes the impacts of climate change on both water demands and resources, and the generation of synthetic flows of the Brahmaputra River using time series models. The simulated values of the indicators reveal that the expected demand of the BFA up to the year 2050 can be supplied with the proposed Brahmaputra Barrage inside Bangladesh under the ‘no change’ in climatic condition, provided that the groundwater remains usable. However, if groundwater becomes unusable due to widespread arsenic contamination and/or a climate change occurs, it would not be possible to meet the future water demand of the region with high reliability, moderate resiliency and low vulnerability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayazit M, Unal NE (1990) Effects of hedging on reservoir performance. Water Resour Res 26(4):713–719
Box GEP, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC (1994) Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Burn DH, Venema HD, Simonovic SP (1991) Risk-based performance criteria for real time reservoir operation. Can J Civ Eng 18:36–42
Chowdhury JU, Haque A (1990) Permissible water withdrawal based upon prediction of salt-water intrusion in the Meghna Delta. IAHS Publication No. 197:111–117
Expert Study Group, Halcrow SW et al (1984) Engineering appraisal of the Brahmaputra multipurpose development project. Bangladesh Water Development Board, Dhaka
Farquharson F, Fung F, Chowdhury JU, Hassan A, Horsburgh K, Lowe J (2007) Impact of climate and sea level change in part of the Indian Sub-Continent (CLASIC). Final report, Department for International Development, UK
Fiering MB (1982a) A screening model to quantify resilience. Water Resour Res 18(1):27–32
Fiering MB (1982b) Alternative indices of resilience. Water Resour Res 18(1):33–39
Hashimoto T, Stedinger JR, Loucks DP (1982) Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20
Hipel KW, McLeod AI (1994) Time series modeling of water resources and environmental systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, UK
Islam MS (2004) Optimal water application decisions with deficit irrigation. PhD dissertation, Department of Water Resources Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka
Kjeldsen TR, Rosbjerg D (2004) Choice of reliability, resilience and vulnerability estimators for risk assessments of water resources systems. Hydrol Sci J 49(5):755–767
Klemes V (1977) Value of information in reservoir optimization. Water Resour Res 13(5):837–850
Ministry of Water Resources (1999) National water policy. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka
Mondal MS (2005) Risk-based evaluation of performance in water management for the Ganges delta within Bangladesh. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Informatics and Communication, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia
Mondal MS, Chowdhury JU, Khatun F (2007) Risk-based evaluation of Brahmaputra water development in meeting future water demand, Technical report 1: generation of synthetic flows of the Brahmaputra River using time series models. Institute of Water and Flood Management, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka
Mondal MS, Chowdhury JU, Ferdous MR (2008) Risk-based evaluation of Brahmaputra water development in meeting future water demand, Technical report 2: risk-based evaluation of performance of proposed barrage on the Brahmaputra. Institute of Water and Flood Management, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka
Moy WS, Cohon JL, ReVelle CS (1986) A programming model for analysis of the reliability, resilience and vulnerability of a water supply reservoir. Water Resour Res 22(4):489–498
Prasad AS, Umamahesh NV, Viswanath GK (2006) Optimal irrigation planning under water scarcity. J Irrig Drain Eng 132(3):228–237
Salas JD, Boes DC, Yevjevich V, Pegram GGS (1979) Hurst phenomenon as a pre-asymptotic behaviour. J Hydrol 44:1–15
Simonovic SP, Venema HD, Burn DH (1992) Risk-based parameter selection for short-term reservoir operation. J Hydrol 131:269–291
Stedinger JR, Taylor MR (1982) Synthetic streamflow generation: model verification and validation. Water Resour Res 18(4):909–918
Stewart JI, Hagan RM, Pruitt WO et al (1977) Optimizing crop production through control of water and salinity levels in the soil. Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan
Tickle K (1997) An investigation of the use of performance metrics for modelling uncertainty in water resource systems. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
WARPO (1996) River survey project, Special report no. 24: morphological processes in the Jamuna River. Flood Action Plan 24, Water Resources Planning Organization, Dhaka
WARPO (2001) National water management plan, volume 2: main report. National Water Management Plan Project, Water Resources Planning Organization, Dhaka
Weeraratne JR, Logan L, Unny TE (1986) Performance evaluation of alternate policies on reservoir system operation. Can J Civ Eng 13:203–212
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mondal, M.S., Chowdhury, J.U. & Ferdous, M.R. Risk-Based Evaluation for Meeting Future Water Demand of the Brahmaputra Floodplain Within Bangladesh. Water Resour Manage 24, 853–869 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9475-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9475-5