Skip to main content
Log in

The Development of Rating Curve Considering Variance Function Using Pseudo-likelihood Estimation Method

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper employs a new estimation method for estimating stage–discharge rating curve parameters. In typical practical applications, the original non-linear rating curve is transformed into a simple linear regression model by log-transforming the measurement without examining the effect of heteroscedasticity of residuals. Therefore, the model with pseudo-likelihood estimation is developed in this study to deal with heteroscedasticity of residuals in the original non-linear model. The parameters of rating curves and variance functions of errors are simultaneously estimated by the pseudo-likelihood estimation (P-LE) method. Also simulated annealing, a sort of global optimization techniques, is adapted to minimize the log likelihood of the weighted residuals. At first, the developed P-LE model was applied to a hypothetical site where stage–discharge data were generated by incorporating various errors for statistical test. Also, the limit of stages for segmentation is estimated in the process of P-LE using the Heaviside function. For the validation of effects of the developed P-LE model, the results of the conventional log-transformed linear regression (LT-LR) model and the P-LE model are estimated and compared. After statistical simulation, the developed P-LE model is then applied to the real data sets from six gauge stations in the Geum River basin. It can be suggested that this new estimation method is applied to real river sites to successfully determine the weights taking into account error distributions from observed discharge data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control AC-19:716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. J R Statist Soc Ser B, 26:211–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll RJ, Ruppert D (1988) Transformation and weighting in regression. Chapman & Hall, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke RT (1999) Uncertainty in the estimation of mean annual flood due to rating-curve indefinition. J Hydrol 222:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGagne MPJ, Douglas GG, Hudson HR, Simonovic SP (1996) A decision support system for the analysis and use of stage–discharge rating curves. J Hydrol 184:225–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder PI (1975) The log-likelihood rating in segmented regression. Ann Statist 3:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfield SM, Quandt RE (1992) Non-linear least squares: the variable projection method and its applications. Inver Probl 1–26

  • Herschy RW (1995) Streamflow measurement, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkley DV (1969) Inference about the intersection in two-phase regression. Biometrika 56:495–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huet S, Bouvier A, Gruet MA, Jolivet E (1996) Statistical tools for nonlinear regression. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1998) Measurement of liquid flow in open channels—part 2: determination of the stage–discharge relationship. ISO standard 1100-2. International organization of standards, pp 133–153

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gellat CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korea Institute of Construction Technology (1994) Stage and discharge relation curve. Water resources management technique research report, Seoul (in Korean)

  • Lambie JC (1978) Measurement of flow-velocity-area methods. In: Hershcy RW (ed) Hydrometry: principles and practices, chapter 1. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KS (2001) The establishment of water resources information analysis system. Water resources investigation research report, Korea water resources corporation, Daejeon (in Korean)

  • Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Teller AW, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculation by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21:1087–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC, Peck EA (1992) Introduction to linear regression analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosley MP, McKerchar AI (1993) Streamflow. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 8.1–8.39

    Google Scholar 

  • Overlier P (2006) Modelling stage–discharge relationships affected by hysteresis using the Jones formula and nonlinear regression. Hydrological Sciences 51(3):365–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen-Øverleir A (2004) Accounting for heteroscedasticity in rating curve estimates. J Hydrol 292:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen-Øverleir A, Reitan T (2005) Objective segmentation in compound rating curves. J Hydrol 311:188–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philips RF (1991) A constrained maximum-likelihood approach to estimating switching regression. J Econometr 48:241–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quandt RE (1972) A new approach to estimating switching regressions. J Am Statist Assoc 67:306–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rantz SE (1982) Measurement and computation of streamflow, vol II. Computation of discharge. US geological survey water supply paper 2175, Washington

  • Rayward-Smith VJ, Osman IH, Reeves CR, Smith GD (1996) Modern heuristic search methods. Wiley, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan T, Petersen-Øverleir A (2006) Existence of the frequentistic regression estimate of a power-law with location parameter, with applications for making discharge rating curves. Stoc Env Res Risk Asses 20:445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer VB, Meyer RW (1992) Determination of error in individual discharge measurements. US Geological Survey Open-file Report: 92–144

  • Schmidt AR, Yen BC (2002) Stage–discharge ratings revisited. Hydraulic measurements and experimental methods. In: Proc, EWRI and IAHR joint conf, Colo

  • Schwartz G (1979) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Statist 6:461–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF, Wild CJ (1989) Nonlinear regression. Wiley, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapragasam C, Mutill N (2005) Discharge rating curve extension—a new approach. Water Resour Manag 19:505–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tishler A, Zang I (1981) A new maximum-likelihood algorithm for piecewise regression. J Am Statist Assoc 76:980–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torsten D, Gerd M, Torsten S (2002) Extrapolating stage–discharge relationships by numerical modeling. In: Int conf on hydraulic engineering. Warshaw

  • Venetis C (1970) A note on the estimation of the parameters in logarithmic stage–discharge relationships with estimation of their error. Bull. IASH 15:105–111

    Google Scholar 

  • World Meteorological Organization (1994) Guide to hydrological practices, 5th edn. WMO-No.168, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang Ug Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, W.S., Lee, K.S., Kim, S.U. et al. The Development of Rating Curve Considering Variance Function Using Pseudo-likelihood Estimation Method. Water Resour Manage 24, 321–348 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9448-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9448-8

Keywords

Navigation