Skip to main content
Log in

Managing Cumulative Impacts: Groundwater Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cumulative impacts of incremental development present governments all over the world with major difficulties. Well-intended strategic approaches often fail, in whole or in part. In Australia, a joint Federal/State agreement in 1992 initiated reforms of State environmental legislation and policy, which led to the Council of Australian Governments Water Reform Framework 1994—an agreement to introduce comprehensive water reforms targeted at both financial and environmental issues. The Murray-Darling Basin, Australia’s largest catchment, overlaps four States plus the small Australian Capital Territory. In 1995 pressing problems of land and water degradation, and the decline of widespread and important environmental values in the Basin, led only to a cap (an administrative limit or ceiling) on river water extraction, even though the importance of the surface water/groundwater connection was evident. Moreover, State Governments have been extremely slow to implement core groundwater reforms added to the Framework in 1996—with some important elements not yet implemented after 12 years. This delay, combined with the failure of States to implement commitments to the precautionary management of natural resources, has magnified the environmental and economic crisis facing the Basin. This crisis appears likely to worsen if current climate change predictions eventuate. Recent initiatives by the Australian Government acknowledge past procrastination, and provide a new administrative framework—an approach will only work if backed by political intelligence and will-power, and good-will and cooperation amongst State premiers. These factors have been absent in the past. The paper concludes with key recommendations aimed at comprehensive and integrated management of the cumulative impacts of incremental water-related development on a catchment-by-catchment basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANZECC Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (2000) Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • ARMCANZ Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (1996a) National principles for the provision of water for ecosystems. Standing Committee on Agriculture and Resource Management, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • ARMCANZ Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (1996b) Allocation and use of groundwater: a national framework for improved groundwater management in Australia. Task Force on CoAG Water Reform, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen D (2003) Report on Dumaresq River groundwater model: model development. Department of Natural Resources and Mines Queensland, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey F (2001) Assessment of water resource plans under the Water Act 2000 (Queensland) with consideration of ecological outcomes and environmental flow objectives in the context of the precautionary principle and sustainable management. Environ Plann Law J 18:244–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell D (2007) Water politics in the Murray-Darling Basin. Federation Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO (2008) Water availability in the Murray-Darling Basin. CSIRO Division of Land and Water, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen P (2006) Flying blind—the disconnect between groundwater and policy. Paper presented to the Murray-Darling Basin Groundwater Workshop, Canberra, 19 September

  • Cullen P, Whittington J, Fraser G (2000) Likely ecological outcomes of the COAG water reforms. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielopol DL, Griebler C, Gunatilaka A, Notenboom J (2003) Present state and future prospects for groundwater ecosystems. Environ Conserv 30:104–130. doi:10.1017/S0376892903000109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DPMC Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet Australia (2007) A national plan for water security. Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Earth Tech Engineering (2003) Review of selected factors that may change future flow patterns in the River Murray system. Murray Darling Basin Commission MDBC, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans R (2007) The impact of groundwater use on Australia’s rivers: technical report. Land and Water Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans R, Clifton C (2001) Environmental water requirements to maintain groundwater dependent ecosystems. Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans R, Richardson S, Hillier J, Bonte M, Dyson P, Ross J, Middlemis H (2003) Watermark: sustainable groundwater use within irrigation regions. Murray-Darling Basin Commission MDBC, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans R, Evans R, Jolly P, Barnett S, Hatton T, Merrick N, Simmons C (2006) National Groundwater Reform, Sydney, November. Available at http://www.ncgm.uts.edu.au/media/National_GW_Reform.pdf

  • Finlayson B, Ladson A, Nevill J (2008) Managing cumulative impacts on Australia’s water resources. Paper presented to the Water Downunder Conference, Adelaide

  • GABCC Great Artesian Basin Consultative Council (2000) Great artesian basin strategic management plan. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Goesch T, Hone S, Gooday P (2007) Groundwater management: efficiency and sustainability. ABARE Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Australia (1992) National strategy for ecologically sustainable development. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • GTRG Groundwater Technical Reference Group (2004) Estimated impact of groundwater use on streamflow in the Murray-Darling Basin. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafi A, Brownlowe N, Welsh W (2006) Groundwater and surface water use in the Dumaresq River Valley. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics ABARE, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248. doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatton T, Evans R (1998) Dependence of ecosystems on groundwater and its significance to Australia. Land and Water Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys WF (2006) Aquifers: the ultimate groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Aust J Bot 54:115–132. doi:10.1071/BT04151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAG Independent Audit Group (2007) Review of cap implementation 2005/06. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • IAG Independent Audit Group (2008) Review of cap implementation 2006/07: report of the Independent Audit Group. Murray Darling Basin Commission, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • IAHA International Association of Hydrogeologists Australia (2004) Guiding principles for sustainable groundwater management. Murray-Darling Basin Commission in collaboration with Resource and Environmental Management SA, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G, Hillman T, Kingsford R, McMahon T, Walker K, Arthington A, Whittington J, Cartwright S (2002) Independent report of the expert reference panel on environmental flows and water quality requirements for the River Murray System. River Murray Project Board, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford R, Nevill J (2006) Urgent need for a systematic expansion of freshwater protected areas in Australia: a scientists consensus statement. Pac Conserv Biol 12(1):7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson A, Finlayson B (2002) Rhetoric and reality in the allocation of water to the environment: a case study of the Goulburn River, Victoria Australia. River Res Appl 18:555–568. doi:10.1002/rra.680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig D, Hilborn R, Walters C (1993) Uncertainty, resource exploitation and conservation: lessons from history. Science 260(2):17. doi:10.1126/science.260.5104.17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LWA Land and Water Australia (2007) The impact of groundwater use on Australia’s rivers: exploring technical, management and policy challenges. LWA, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • MDBC Murray-Darling Basin Commission (2008) Water audit monitoring report 2006/07: report of the MDBC on the cap on diversions. MDBC, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • MDBMC Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council (1998) Floodplain wetlands management strategy. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • MDBMC Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council (2001) Integrated catchment management in the Murray-Darling Basin 2001-2010. Murray-Darling Basin Commission MDBC, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevill J (2001a) Freshwater biodiversity: protecting Australian freshwater ecosystems in the face of infrastructure development. Water Research Foundation of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevill J (2001b) Submission: Wy Yung groundwater supply protection area groundwater management plan draft for consultation Southern Rural Water. Available at http://www.tucs.org.au/~cnevill/Submission_Wy_Yung_groundwater.doc. Accessed January 3, 2007

  • Nevill J (2003) Managing the cumulative effects of incremental development in freshwater resources. Environ Plann Law J 20(2):85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevill J (2006) The precautionary principle in Australian ocean management, OnlyOnePlanet Australia. Available at http://www.ids.org.au/~cnevill/marinePrecautionaryPrinciple.doc. Accessed August 18 2007

  • Nevill J (2008) Comment on recent progress in water-balance planning and the supply of environmental flows to ground water-dependent ecosystems. Ecological Management & Restoration 9(2):145–148. doi:10.1111/j.1442-8903.2008.00407.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum W (1982) Environmental degradation and the tyranny of small decisions. Bioscience 32(9):728–729. doi:10.2307/1308718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, Justice CJ (2006) New South Wales land and environment court. Telstra Corporation Limited v Hornsby Shire Council, 133, 24 March 2006

  • Pringle CM (2001) Hydrologic connectivity and the management of biological reserves: a global perspective. Ecol Appl 11:981–998. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0981:HCATMO]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCRRAT Senate Standing Committe on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport (2006) Water policy initiatives: final report. Department of the Senate—Parliament House, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair Knight Metz SKM (2003) Projections of groundwater extraction rates and implications for future demand and competition for surface water. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair Knight Metz SKM (2006) Towards a national framework for managing the impacts of groundwater and surface water interaction in Australia. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia, Armadale Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer B, Horwitz P (2001) Water quality and macroinvertebrate response to acidification following intensified summer droughts in a Western Australian wetland. Mar Freshw Res 52:1015–1021. doi:10.1071/MF00021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous M (2000) From safe yield to sustainable development of water resources—the Kansas experience. J Hydrol 235(1–2):27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous M (2002) Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeol J 10:52–67. doi:10.1007/s10040-001-0170-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southern Rural Water SRW (2007) Draft water plan 2008-2013. SRW, Maffra Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan P-L (2000) Conflict over water resources in Queensland: all eyes on the Lower Balonne. Environ Plann Law J 17:545–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull M (2007a) New $52 million groundwater action plan. Press release. Parliament House, Canberra, 19 Sept

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull M (2007b) Water bill 2007—second reading speech. Available at http://www.malcolmturnbull.com.au/news/Article.aspx?ID=898. Accessed February 9, 2007

  • Turral H, Fullagar I (2007) Institutional directions in groundwater management in Australia. In: Giordano M, Villholth KG (eds) The agricultural groundwater revolution: opportunities and threats to development. CAB International, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists (2003) Blueprint for a national water plan. WWF Australia, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • WRON Alliance (2007) Australian water resources 2005: a baseline assessment of water resources for the National Water Initiative. National Water Commission Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Zektser S, Loaiciga HA, Wolf JT (2005) Environmental impacts of groundwater overdraft: selected case studies in the southwestern United States. Environ Geol 47:396–404. doi:10.1007/s00254-004-1164-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Jonathan Nevill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nevill, C.J. Managing Cumulative Impacts: Groundwater Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Water Resour Manage 23, 2605–2631 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9399-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9399-0

Keywords

Navigation