Abstract
Recent developments in the policy sciences emphasize the social environment in which decisions are made. The ‘network metaphor’ is often used to describe the key role of interactions between interdependent actors involved in decision making. These interactions take place in a policy arena drawn up by actors with an interest in and control over decisions on the issues addressed. Interdependencies, caused by the need for actors to increase their means of realizing objectives, are the driving force behind these interactions. Dependency relations are of special interest to water management and river basin management because of the fundamental asymmetrical interdependencies that exist in river basins between upstream and downstream stakeholders. Coleman’s linear system of action models decision making process involving dependencies between multiple stakeholders as exchange of control over issues, while interactions are required to negotiate exchanges of control. We developed an interactive method for actor analysis based on Coleman’s linear system of action and applied it to the national rural water management policy domain in The Netherlands. The method is firmly rooted in mathematical sociology and defies the criticism that methods for actor and stakeholder analysis do not specify a theoretical basis explaining the causal relations between the variables analyzed and policy change. With the application to the rural water management policy arena we intended to increase our insight into the practical applicability of this analytic method in an interactive workshop, the acceptability of the approach for the participating actors, its contribution to the process of decision making and our understanding of the rural water management policy arena in The Netherlands. We found that the Association of Water Authorities, the Ministry of Public Works and the Ministry of Agriculture are the most powerful actor in the policy domain, while governance and cost and benefits of rural water management are the most salient issues. Progress in policy development for rural water management is probably most promising for the issues governance, costs and benefits, safety and rural living conditions through improved interaction between the Association of Water Authorities, the Ministry of Agriculture and the Rural Credit Bank. Besides these analytic results the interactive approach implemented increased the participants understanding of their dependency on other actors in the rural water management policy domain and supported them in developing a sound perspective on their dependency position. We concluded that the method developed is acceptable to real-world policy decision makers, can successfully be applied in an interactive setting, potentially contributes to the process of decision making by increasing the participants understanding of their dependency position, has the potential to delivers valuable advice for future decision-making and increases our understanding of policy development for rural water management in general.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Beroggi GEG (1999) Decision modeling in policy management: an introduction to the analytical concepts. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA
Beroggi GEG (2000) An experimental investigation of preference elicitation methods in policy decision making. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 9:76–89. doi:10.1002/1099-1360(200001/05)9:1/3<76::AID-MCDA268>3.0.CO;2-5
Braybrooke D (1974) Traffic congestion goes through the issue machine. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Bueno de Mesquita BKP (1994) Political forecasting: an expected utility method. In: Bueno de Mesquita B, Stokman FN (eds) European community decision-making models, comparisons, and applications. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT
Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of social theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA
Crosby BL (1992) Stakeholder analysis: a vital tool for strategic managers. USAID, Washington, DC
Gregory R, Keeney R (1994) Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values. Manage Sci 40(8):1035–1048
Haas EB (1980) Why collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes. World Polit 32:357–405. doi:10.2307/2010109
Hermans L (2005) Actor analysis for water resources management putting the promise into practice. Eburon, Delft
Keeney RL (1992) Value-focused thinking. A path to creative decision-making. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA
Knoke D (1992) Networks of elite structure and decision making. In: Wassermann S, Galaskiewicz J (eds) Advances in social network analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Kunreuther H, Lathrop J, Linnerooth H (1982) A descriptive model of choice for siting facilities. Behav Sci 27:281–296. doi:10.1002/bs.3830270307
Laumann EO, Knoke D (1987) The organizational state, social choice in national policy domains. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI
Lindblom CE (1959) The science of muddling through. Public Adm Rev 19(1):79–88
LNV (2000) Rural development programme 2000–2006. LNV, The Netherlands
LNV (2004) Agenda for a living countryside: vision. LNV, The Netherlands
Meltsner AJ (1972) Political feasibility and policy analysis. Public Adm Rev 32:859–867. doi:10.2307/974646
Mylopoulos Y, Kolokytha E, Kampragou E, Vagiona D (2005) A combined methodology for transboundary river basin management in Europe. Application in the Nestos–Mesta Catchment Area. Water Resour Manage (2008) 22:1101–1112
Nash John F Jr (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155–162. doi:10.2307/1907266
Olsson JA, Andersson L (2007) Possibilities and problems with the use of models as a communication tool in water resource management. Water Resour Manage 21:97–110. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9043-1
Rietveld P, Ouwersloot H (1992) Ordinal data in multi criteria decision making, a stochastic dominance approach to siting nuclear power plants. Eur J Oper Res 56:249–262. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(92)90226-Y
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty TL (1996) The analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
Schouten Meinke J, Timmermans Johannes S, Beroggi Giampiero EG, Douven Wim JAM (2001) Multi-actor information system for integrated coastal zone management. Environ Impact Assess Rev 21:271–289. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00073-7
Scott J (2000) Social network analysis, a handbook. Sage, London
Stokman FN, Zeggelink EPH (1996) Is politics power or policy oriented? A comparative analysis of dynamic access models in policy networks. J Math Sociol 21:1–2, 77–111
Teisman GR (1995) Complexe Besluitvorming, een pluricentrisch perspectief op besluitvorming over ruimtelijke investeringen. VGA Publisher, s-Gravenhage, Nederland
Timmermans JS (2001) Interactieve Actoranalyse VPR Noord-Holland Zuid. Wpoint Interactief, Amsterdam
Timmermans JS (2004) Purposive interaction in multi-actor decision making operationalizing Coleman’s linear system of action for policy decision support. Eburon, Delft
Timmermans JS, Beroggi GEG (2000) Conflict resolution in sustainable infrastructure management. Saf Sci 35(1–3):175–192. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00030-8
Timmermans JS, Beroggi GEG (2004) An experimental assessment of Coleman’s linear system of action for supporting policy negotiations. Comput Math Organ Theory 10:267–285. doi:10.1023/B:CMOT.0000045372.79166.99
Turner JH (1998) The structure of sociological theory, 6th edn. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA
van der Zaag P (2007) Asymmetry and equity in water resources management: critical institutional issues for Southern Africa. Water Resour Manage 21:1993–2004. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9124-1
van Eeten MJG (1999) Dialogues of the deaf: defining new agendas for environmental deadlocks. Eburon Publishers, Delft, The Netherlands
Weber M (1958) [1904] The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Scribners, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Timmermans, J. Interactive Actor Analysis for Rural Water Management in The Netherlands: An Application of the Transactional Approach. Water Resour Manage 23, 1211–1236 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9323-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9323-z