Skip to main content
Log in

Cost–Effectiveness Analysis of Water Management Measures in Two River Basins of Jordan and Lebanon

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chekka Bay area and Amman Zarqa Basin are two complex river basins in northern Lebanon and northern Jordan respectively. Both regions are faced with growing populations, urban development and land-use changes. They also both suffer from water-resource scarcity and contrasted seasons that threaten the perennity of sufficient water supply. Decision makers may have several water-management measures in response to the issue of water deficiency in their regions, but they need simple methods and criteria for ranking the alternatives with respect to their economical efficiency. In this paper, the Cost–Effectiveness Analysis method is used for supporting decisions to optimally combine water management measures at the river basin scale. Hydrologic and socio-economic data are used for assessing the future water balance and determine the sustainable management objectives. Both supply- and demand-side measures are investigated and compared. The analysis is based on two basic metrics to assess cost–effectiveness ratios: the average annualized and the marginal (or incremental) unit cost. The results show that the cost–effectiveness ranking of alternative measures strongly depends on the selected metric. The average annualized unit cost systematically favours large scaled water measures with high costs while the average incremental unit cost facilitates the selection of smaller and costless measures reflecting the time preference for water supply.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADB (1999) Handbook for the economic analysis of water supply projects. Asian Development Bank, Economics and Development Resource Center. Available at: http://www.adb.org/Documents/Handbooks/Water_Supply_Projects/default.asp. Cited Jul 2007

  • Aulong S, Bouzit M (2007) Deliverable #33. Report on cost–effectiveness analysis in the four MEDITATE case studies (Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and Syria). BRGM—Geological Survey, Montpellier

  • Braden JB (2000) Value of valuation: introduction. J Water Resour Plan Manage 126(6):336–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDR (2004) Schéma directeur d’aménagement du territoire Libanais. Conseil du Développement et de la Reconstruction Libanais (CDR), Beyrouth

  • Claassen THL (2007) Experiences with DSS in ecologically based water management in the province of Friesland, The Netherlands. Ecol Eng 30(2):176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dziegielewski B (2003) Strategies for managing water demand. In: Water resources update. Universities Council on Water Resources. Available at: http://www.ucowr.siu.edu/updates/126/126_A4.pdf. Cited Apr 2008

  • ECOLOGIC (2004) Basic principles for selecting the most cost-effective combinations of measures for inclusion in the programme of measures as described in article 11 of the water framework directive—handbook. Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt), Berlin

  • Fane S, White S (2003) Levelised cost, a general formula for calculations of unit cost in integrated resource planning. Paper presented at efficient 2003: efficient use and management of water for urban supply conference, Tenerife, 2–4 April 2003

  • Gerasidi A, Katsiardi P, Papaefstathiou N, Manoli E, Assimacopoulos D (2003) Cost–effectiveness analysis for water management in the island of Paros, Greece. Paper presented at 8th international conference on environmental science and technology, Lemnos Island, Greece, 8–10 September 2003

  • Gilau AM, Small MJ (2008) Designing cost-effective seawater reverse osmosis system under optimal energy options. Renew Energy 33(4):617–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson A, Fleischer S, Joelsson A (2000) A catchment-oriented and cost-effective policy for water protection. Ecol Eng 14(4):419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe C, White S (1999) Integrated resource planning for water and wastewater Sydney case studies. Water Int 24(4):356–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ker Rault P, Jeffrey P (2006) Collated report on water visions workshops for 2025: Amman Zarqa Basin, Kingdom of Jordan; Chekka bay, Lebanon; Tartous Governorate, Syria; Gökova Basin, Turkey. Deliverable #19. School of Water Sciences Cranfield Univ., Cranfield, UK

  • Kramer DB, Polasky S, Starfield A, Palik B, Westphal L, Snyder S, Jakes P, Hudson R, Gustafson E (2006) A comparison of alternative strategies for cost-effective water quality management in lakes. Environ Manag 38(3):411–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix A, Beaudoin N, Makowski D (2005) Agricultural water nonpoint pollution control under uncertainty and climate variability. Ecol Econ 53(1):115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latinopoulos P, Mylopoulos N, Mylopoulos Y (1997) Risk-based decision analysis in the design of water supply projects. Water Resour Manag 11(4):263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebègue D, Baumstark L, Hirtzman P (2005) Révision du taux d’actualisation des investissements publics. Commissariat Général du Plan, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukas A, Mylopoulos N, Vasiliades L (2007) A modeling system for the evaluation of water resources management strategies in Thessaly, Greece. Water Resour Manag 21(10):1673–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machiwal D, Jha MK, Singh PK, Mahnot SC, Gupta A (2004) Planning and design of cost-effective water harvesting structures for efficient utilization of scarce water resources in semi-arid regions of Rajasthan, India. Water Resour Manag 18(3):219–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massarutto A, Paccagnan V (2007) WFD harmonisation procedures review. The WFD implementation in arid and semi-arid countries: institutional and economic issues. Deliverable 1. Istituto di Economia e Politica dell’Energia e dell’Ambiente; Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Italia

  • MoE (2001) State of the environment report 2001. Lebanon Ministry of Environment, Beirut, Lebanon

  • Montero Martínez J, Martínez RS, Tarjuelo Martín-Benito JM (2004) Analysis of water application cost with permanent set sprinkler irrigation systems. Irrig Sci 23(3):103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MWI (1997) Water sector investment program 1997–2011. Ministry of Water and Irrigation, Amman, Jordan

  • MWI (2004) National Water Master Plan (NWMP)—volume 3: water uses and demands. Ministry of Water and Irrigation & GTZ, Amman, Jordan

  • MWI and Consolidated Consultants (2004) Environmental and social assessment, Disi-Mudawarra to Amman water conveyance system. Part B. Water sector ESA. Ministry of Water and Irrigation, Amman, Jordan

  • Schleiniger R (1999) Comprehensive cost–effectiveness analysis of measures to reduce nitrogen emissions in Switzerland. Ecol Econ 30(1):147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2000) Guidelines for preparing economic analyses. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • WATECO (2003) Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document no 1. European community—Working group 2.6—WATECO, Luxembourg

  • Wheida E, Verhoeven R (2007) An alternative solution of the water shortage problem in Libya. Water Resour Manag 21(6):961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White SB, Fane SA (2002) Designing cost effective water demand management programs in Australia. Water Sci Technol 46(6–7):225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • White SB, Fane SA, Robinson D (2003) The use of levelised cost in comparing supply and demand side options for water supply and wastewater treatment. Water Supply 3(3):185–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang WH, Khanna M, Farnsworth R, Onal H (2003) Integrating economic, environmental and GIS modeling to target cost effective land retirement in multiple watersheds. Ecol Econ 46(2):249–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanou B (2006) Decrease of non-point water pollution: a practical algorithm for the user-friendly presentation of the cost–effectiveness comparison of management measures. In: E-WAter. Official publication of the European Water Association (EWA). Available at: http://www.ewaonline.de/journal/2006_01.pdf. Cited Jul 2007

  • Zanou B, Kontogianni A, Skourtos M (2003) A classification approach of cost effective management measures for the improvement of watershed quality. Ocean Coast Manag 46(11–12):957–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphanie Aulong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aulong, S., Bouzit, M. & Dörfliger, N. Cost–Effectiveness Analysis of Water Management Measures in Two River Basins of Jordan and Lebanon. Water Resour Manage 23, 731–753 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9297-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9297-x

Keywords

Navigation