Abstract
Chekka Bay area and Amman Zarqa Basin are two complex river basins in northern Lebanon and northern Jordan respectively. Both regions are faced with growing populations, urban development and land-use changes. They also both suffer from water-resource scarcity and contrasted seasons that threaten the perennity of sufficient water supply. Decision makers may have several water-management measures in response to the issue of water deficiency in their regions, but they need simple methods and criteria for ranking the alternatives with respect to their economical efficiency. In this paper, the Cost–Effectiveness Analysis method is used for supporting decisions to optimally combine water management measures at the river basin scale. Hydrologic and socio-economic data are used for assessing the future water balance and determine the sustainable management objectives. Both supply- and demand-side measures are investigated and compared. The analysis is based on two basic metrics to assess cost–effectiveness ratios: the average annualized and the marginal (or incremental) unit cost. The results show that the cost–effectiveness ranking of alternative measures strongly depends on the selected metric. The average annualized unit cost systematically favours large scaled water measures with high costs while the average incremental unit cost facilitates the selection of smaller and costless measures reflecting the time preference for water supply.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ADB (1999) Handbook for the economic analysis of water supply projects. Asian Development Bank, Economics and Development Resource Center. Available at: http://www.adb.org/Documents/Handbooks/Water_Supply_Projects/default.asp. Cited Jul 2007
Aulong S, Bouzit M (2007) Deliverable #33. Report on cost–effectiveness analysis in the four MEDITATE case studies (Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and Syria). BRGM—Geological Survey, Montpellier
Braden JB (2000) Value of valuation: introduction. J Water Resour Plan Manage 126(6):336–338
CDR (2004) Schéma directeur d’aménagement du territoire Libanais. Conseil du Développement et de la Reconstruction Libanais (CDR), Beyrouth
Claassen THL (2007) Experiences with DSS in ecologically based water management in the province of Friesland, The Netherlands. Ecol Eng 30(2):176–186
Dziegielewski B (2003) Strategies for managing water demand. In: Water resources update. Universities Council on Water Resources. Available at: http://www.ucowr.siu.edu/updates/126/126_A4.pdf. Cited Apr 2008
ECOLOGIC (2004) Basic principles for selecting the most cost-effective combinations of measures for inclusion in the programme of measures as described in article 11 of the water framework directive—handbook. Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt), Berlin
Fane S, White S (2003) Levelised cost, a general formula for calculations of unit cost in integrated resource planning. Paper presented at efficient 2003: efficient use and management of water for urban supply conference, Tenerife, 2–4 April 2003
Gerasidi A, Katsiardi P, Papaefstathiou N, Manoli E, Assimacopoulos D (2003) Cost–effectiveness analysis for water management in the island of Paros, Greece. Paper presented at 8th international conference on environmental science and technology, Lemnos Island, Greece, 8–10 September 2003
Gilau AM, Small MJ (2008) Designing cost-effective seawater reverse osmosis system under optimal energy options. Renew Energy 33(4):617–630
Gustafson A, Fleischer S, Joelsson A (2000) A catchment-oriented and cost-effective policy for water protection. Ecol Eng 14(4):419–427
Howe C, White S (1999) Integrated resource planning for water and wastewater Sydney case studies. Water Int 24(4):356–362
Ker Rault P, Jeffrey P (2006) Collated report on water visions workshops for 2025: Amman Zarqa Basin, Kingdom of Jordan; Chekka bay, Lebanon; Tartous Governorate, Syria; Gökova Basin, Turkey. Deliverable #19. School of Water Sciences Cranfield Univ., Cranfield, UK
Kramer DB, Polasky S, Starfield A, Palik B, Westphal L, Snyder S, Jakes P, Hudson R, Gustafson E (2006) A comparison of alternative strategies for cost-effective water quality management in lakes. Environ Manag 38(3):411–425
Lacroix A, Beaudoin N, Makowski D (2005) Agricultural water nonpoint pollution control under uncertainty and climate variability. Ecol Econ 53(1):115–127
Latinopoulos P, Mylopoulos N, Mylopoulos Y (1997) Risk-based decision analysis in the design of water supply projects. Water Resour Manag 11(4):263
Lebègue D, Baumstark L, Hirtzman P (2005) Révision du taux d’actualisation des investissements publics. Commissariat Général du Plan, Paris, France
Loukas A, Mylopoulos N, Vasiliades L (2007) A modeling system for the evaluation of water resources management strategies in Thessaly, Greece. Water Resour Manag 21(10):1673–1702
Machiwal D, Jha MK, Singh PK, Mahnot SC, Gupta A (2004) Planning and design of cost-effective water harvesting structures for efficient utilization of scarce water resources in semi-arid regions of Rajasthan, India. Water Resour Manag 18(3):219–235
Massarutto A, Paccagnan V (2007) WFD harmonisation procedures review. The WFD implementation in arid and semi-arid countries: institutional and economic issues. Deliverable 1. Istituto di Economia e Politica dell’Energia e dell’Ambiente; Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Italia
MoE (2001) State of the environment report 2001. Lebanon Ministry of Environment, Beirut, Lebanon
Montero Martínez J, Martínez RS, Tarjuelo Martín-Benito JM (2004) Analysis of water application cost with permanent set sprinkler irrigation systems. Irrig Sci 23(3):103–110
MWI (1997) Water sector investment program 1997–2011. Ministry of Water and Irrigation, Amman, Jordan
MWI (2004) National Water Master Plan (NWMP)—volume 3: water uses and demands. Ministry of Water and Irrigation & GTZ, Amman, Jordan
MWI and Consolidated Consultants (2004) Environmental and social assessment, Disi-Mudawarra to Amman water conveyance system. Part B. Water sector ESA. Ministry of Water and Irrigation, Amman, Jordan
Schleiniger R (1999) Comprehensive cost–effectiveness analysis of measures to reduce nitrogen emissions in Switzerland. Ecol Econ 30(1):147–159
U.S. EPA (2000) Guidelines for preparing economic analyses. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
WATECO (2003) Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document no 1. European community—Working group 2.6—WATECO, Luxembourg
Wheida E, Verhoeven R (2007) An alternative solution of the water shortage problem in Libya. Water Resour Manag 21(6):961
White SB, Fane SA (2002) Designing cost effective water demand management programs in Australia. Water Sci Technol 46(6–7):225–232
White SB, Fane SA, Robinson D (2003) The use of levelised cost in comparing supply and demand side options for water supply and wastewater treatment. Water Supply 3(3):185–192
Yang WH, Khanna M, Farnsworth R, Onal H (2003) Integrating economic, environmental and GIS modeling to target cost effective land retirement in multiple watersheds. Ecol Econ 46(2):249–267
Zanou B (2006) Decrease of non-point water pollution: a practical algorithm for the user-friendly presentation of the cost–effectiveness comparison of management measures. In: E-WAter. Official publication of the European Water Association (EWA). Available at: http://www.ewaonline.de/journal/2006_01.pdf. Cited Jul 2007
Zanou B, Kontogianni A, Skourtos M (2003) A classification approach of cost effective management measures for the improvement of watershed quality. Ocean Coast Manag 46(11–12):957–983
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aulong, S., Bouzit, M. & Dörfliger, N. Cost–Effectiveness Analysis of Water Management Measures in Two River Basins of Jordan and Lebanon. Water Resour Manage 23, 731–753 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9297-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9297-x