Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-objective Planning for Conjunctive Use of Surface and Subsurface Water Using Genetic Algorithm and Dynamics Programming

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The consideration of fixed cost and time-varying operating cost associated with the simultaneous conjunctive use of surface and subsurface water should be treated as a multi-objective problem due to the conflicting characteristics of these two objectives. In order to solve this multi-objective problem, a novel approach is developed herein by integrating the multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA), constrained differential dynamic programming (CDDP) and the groundwater simulation model ISOQUAD. A MOGA is used to generate the various fixed costs of reservoirs’ scale, generate a pattern of pumping/recharge, and estimate the non-inferior solutions set. A groundwater simulation model ISOQUAD is directly embedded to handle the complex dynamic relationship between the groundwater level and the generated pumping/recharge pattern. The CDDP optimization model is then adopted to distribute the optimal releases among reservoirs provided that reservoir capacities are known. Finally, the effectiveness of our proposed integrated model is verified by solving a water resources planning problem for the conjunctive use of surface and subsurface water in southern Taiwan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Barlow DPM, Ahlfeld P, Dickerman DC (2003) Conjunctive management model for sustained yield of stream-aquifer systems. J Water Resour Plan Manage 129(1):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang LC, Yang CC (2002) Optimizing the rule curves for multi-reservoir operations using a genetic algorithm and HEC-5. J Hydrosci Hydraul Eng 20(1):59–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang LC, Shoemaker CA, Liu PLF (1992) Optimal time-varying pumping rates for groundwater remediation: application of a constrained optimal control algorithm. Water Resour Res 28(12):3157–3171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David WW Jr, Daene CM (1998) Decomposition methods for water resources optimization models with fixed costs. Water Resour Res 21:283–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean Randall L (1997) Water supply planning simulation model using mixed-integer linear programming engine. J Water Resour Plan Manage 123:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deepak Khare MK, Jat E (2006) Assessment of conjunctive use planning options: a case study of Sapon irrigation command area of Indonesia. J Hydrology 328:764–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithm in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-WESLEY, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakan B, Miguel AM (1999) Joint management of surface and ground water supplies. Ground Water 37(2):214–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao CT, Chang LC (2002) Dynamic optimal groundwater management while considering fixed cost. J Water Resour Plan Manage 128(1):57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu S-K (1995) Shortage indices for water-resources planning in Taiwan. J Water Resour Plan Manage 121(2):119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hydrologic Engineering Center (1966) Reservoir yield, generalized computer program 23-J2-L245. US Army, Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hydrologic Engineering Center (1975) Hydrologic engineering methods for water resources development: reservoir yield, vol. 8. US Army, Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray DM, Yakowitz SJ (1981) The application of optimal control methodology to nonlinear programming problems. Math Program 21(3):331–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philbrick CR, Peter KK (1998) Optimal conjunctive-use operations and plans. Water Resour Res 34(5):1307–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder GF (1978) Galerkin finite element models for aquifer simulation. Rep. 78-WR-5. Department of Civil Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MJ, Kumar DN (2006) Optimal reservoir operation using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Water Resour Manag 20:861–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Resources Planning Commission (1986) Estimation of water supply requirements in Tainan, Kaohsiung, and Pintung areas. Water Resources Planning Commission, Taipei, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu HR (1997) A study on the relationship between development cost of water resources and water price. In: Proceedings of 1997 conference of rational water usage and production. Hsinchu, Taiwan, pp 41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh CH, Labadie JW (1997) Multi-objective watershed-level planning of storm water detention systems. J Water Resour Plan Manage 123(6):336–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yen JH, Chen CY (2001) Allocation strategy analysis of water resources in South Taiwan. Water Resour Manag 15:283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang-Cheng Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, CC., Chang, LC., Chen, CS. et al. Multi-objective Planning for Conjunctive Use of Surface and Subsurface Water Using Genetic Algorithm and Dynamics Programming. Water Resour Manage 23, 417–437 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9281-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9281-5

Keywords