Skip to main content
Log in

Application of Principal Component Analysis in Grouping Geomorphic Parameters for Hydrologic Modeling

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Principal component analysis has been applied to thirteen dimensionless geomorphic parameters for sixteen watersheds of the Chambal catchment of Rajasthan, India, in order to group the parameters under different components based on significant correlations. Results of the principal component analysis clearly revealed that first two principal components are strongly correlated with some of the geomorphic parameters. However, the third principal component is not found to be strongly correlated with any of the parameters but is moderately correlated with stream length ratio and bifurcation ratio. Furthermore, on the basis of the results, it is evident that some parameters are highly correlated with components but the parameters of hypsometric integral and drainage factor could not be grouped with any of the component because of its poor correlation with them. The principal component loadings matrix obtained using correlation matrix of ten parameters reveals that first three components together account for 87.01% of the total explained variance. Therefore, principal component lading matrix is applied in order to get better correlations and clearly grouped the parameters in physically significant components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagley JM, Jeppson RW, Milligan CH (1964) Water yields in Utah agricultural experimental station. Utah State University, Logan, Utah Special Report No. 18

  • Decoursey DG, Deal RB (1974) General aspect of multivariate analysis with applications to some problems in hydrology. In: Proceedings of symposium on statistical hydrology, USDA, miscellaneous publication No. 1275. Washington DC, pp 47–68

  • Haan CT, Allen DM (1972) Comparison of multiple regression and principal component regression for predicting water yields in Kentucky. Water Resour Res 8(6):1593–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan CT, Read HR (1970) Prediction of monthly seasonal and annual runoff volumes for small agricultural watersheds in Kentucky, Bulletin 711, Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Lexington, Kentucky

  • Hotelling H (1933) Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol 24:417–441, 498–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V (1991) Hydrologic response models for prediction of runoff and sediment yields from small watersheds. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India, p 350

  • Kumar V, Satyanarayana T (1993) Application of principal component analysis in grouping geomorphic parameters for hydrologic modeling. J Indian Water Resour Soc 13(1–2):50–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Magner JA, Brooks KN (2007) Predicting stream channel erosion in the lacustrine core of the upper Nemadji River, Minnesota (USA) using stream geomorphology metrics. Environ Geol, published online, http://www.springerlink.com/content/e65ju8857175kh23/?p=2dcbc28f160c4bfc86a413d59b4b1e82&pi=0. Accessed 8 March 2008

  • Mishra N, Satyanatayana T (1988) Parameter grouping—a prelude to hydrologic modeling. Indian J Power River Val Dev 256–260, September

  • Montes-Botella C, Tenorio MD (2003) Water characterization and seasonal heavy metal distribution in the Odiel River (Huelva, Spain) by means of principal component analysis. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 45(4):436–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrklas O, Bentley LR, Lunn SRD, Chu A (2006) Principal component analyses of groundwater chemistry data during enhanced bioremediation. Water Air Soil Pollut 169(1–4):395–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pondzic K, Trninic D (1992) Principal component analysis of a river basin discharge and precipitation anomaly fields associated with the global circulation. J Hydrol 132(1–4):343–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravichandrana S, Ramanibai R, Pundarikanthan NV (1996) Ecoregions for describing water quality patterns in Tamiraparani basin, South India. J Hydrol 178(1–4):257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma KR (2002) Research methodology. National Publishing House, New Delhi, p 514

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP (1992) Elementary hydrology. Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi, India, p 973

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RV (2000) Watershed planning and management. Yash Publishing House, Bikaner, p 470

    Google Scholar 

  • Suresh R (1997) Soil and watert conservation engineering. Standard Publishers Distributors, New Delhi, p 973

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamene L, Park SJ, Dikau R, Vlek PLG (2006) Analysis of factors determining sediment yield variability in the highlands of northern Ethiopia. Geomorphology 76(1–2):76–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong ST (1979) A multivariate statistical model for predicting mean annual flood in New England. Annals Assoc Am Geographers 53:293–311

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. K. Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, P.K., Kumar, V., Purohit, R.C. et al. Application of Principal Component Analysis in Grouping Geomorphic Parameters for Hydrologic Modeling. Water Resour Manage 23, 325–339 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9277-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9277-1

Keywords

Navigation