Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change

Abstract

Water management is facing major challenges due to increasing uncertainties caused by climate and global change and by fast changing socio-economic boundary conditions. More attention has to be devoted to understanding and managing the transition from current management regimes to more adaptive regimes that take into account environmental, technological, economic, institutional and cultural characteristics of river basins. This implies a paradigm shift in water management from a prediction and control to a management as learning approach. The change towards adaptive management could be defined as “learning to manage by managing to learn”. Such change aims at increasing the adaptive capacity of river basins at different scales. The paper identifies major challenges for research and practice how to understand a transition in water management regimes. A conceptual framework is introduced how to characterize water management regimes and the dynamics of transition processes. The European project NeWater project is presented as one approach where new scientific methods and practical tools are developed for the participatory assessment and implementation of adaptive water management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bandura A (1977) Social Learning Theory. Ehglewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, N-J

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berkes FL, Colding J, Folke C (eds.), (2002) Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bormann BT, Cunningham PG, Brookes MH, Manning VW, Collopy MW (1994) Adaptive ecosystem management in the Pacific Northwest. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-341. 22 pages

  4. Bouwen B, Taillieu T (2004) Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: Developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 14:137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Checkland P (1999) Soft Systems Methodology: A 30-year retrospective. Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  6. Craps M (ed) (2003) Social Learning in River Basin Management. Report of workpackage 2 of the HarmoniCOP project (www.harmonicop.info)

  7. Dyson M, Bergkamp G, Scanlon J (eds) Flow. The Essentials of Environmental Flows. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. xiv

  8. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31:437–440

    Google Scholar 

  9. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:8.1–8.33

    Google Scholar 

  10. Framing Committee of the GWSP (2004) The Global Water System Project: Science Framework and Implementation Activities. Earth System Science Partnership. (Draft: February 6, 2004). http://www.gwsp.org

  11. Galaz VR (2005) Does the EC Water Framework Directive build Resilience? Harnessing Socio-Ecological Complexity in European Water Management. Policy Paper I by “The Resilience and Freshwater Initiative”, Swedish Water House, Stockholm

  12. Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31:1257–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gleick PH (2003) Global freshwater resources: Soft-Path solutions for the 21st century. Science 302:524–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gunderson L (1999) Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management – antidotes for spurious certitude? Conservation Ecology 3(1):7. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art7

  15. Hartvigsen G, Kinzig A, Peterson G (1998) Use and analysis of complex adaptive systems in ecosystem science: Overview of special section. Ecosystems 1:427–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huberman BA (ed) (1988) The Ecology of Computation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huitema D, Becker G (2005) Governance, institutions and participation: a comparative assessment of current conditions in selected countries in the Rhine, Amu Darya and Orange river basins. NEWATER report series, No 7, www.newater.info

  19. Kiker CF, Milon JW, Hodges AW (2001) Adaptive learning for science-based policy: the Everglades restoration. Ecological Economics 37:403–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee KN (1999) Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology 3:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levin SA (1998) Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1:431–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moberg F, Galaz V (2005) Resilience: Going from Conventional to Adaptive Freshwater Management for Human and Ecosystem Compatibility. Swedish Water House Policy Brief Nr. 3, SIWI

  23. Pahl-Wostl C (1995) The dynamic nature of ecosystems: Chaos and order entwined. Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Towards sustainability in the water sector: The importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquatic Sciences 64:394–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pahl-Wostl C, Hare M (2004) Processes of social learning in iuntegrated resources management. Journal of Applied and Community Psychology 14:193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pahl-Wostl C (in press) The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. Environmental Modeling and Software, in press

  27. Pahl-Wostl C (2006) The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society 11(1):10. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vo111/iss1/art10/

  28. Pahl-Wostl C, Downing T, Kabat P, Magnuszewski P, Meigh J, Schlueter M, Sendzimir J, Werners S (2004) Transition to Adaptive Water Management; The NeWater project. NeWater Report Series, No. 1, www.newater.info

  29. Richter BD, Mathews R, Harrison DL, Wigington R (2003) Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecological Applications 13:206–224

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rotmans J, Kemp R, van Asselt M (2001) More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight 03:15–31

    Google Scholar 

  31. Senge P (1990) The fifth discipline. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Walker B, Carpenter S, Anderies J, Abel N, Cummings G, Janssen M, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard R (2002) Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology 6(1):14 (online), http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14/main.html

    Google Scholar 

  33. Walters C (1986) Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tillman DE, Larsen T, Pahl-Wostl C, Gujer W (2005) Simulation for strategy development in water supply systems. Hydroinformatics 7/1

    Google Scholar 

  35. Timmerman JG, Langaas S (eds.) (2003) The role and use of environmental information in European transboundary river basin management. IWA Publishing, UK

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vörösmarty C, Lettenmaier D, Lévqêue C, Meybeck M, Pahl-Wostl C (2004) Humans transforming the global water system. EOS 85:513–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Walker B, Carpenter S, Anderies J, Abel N, Cummings G, Janssen M, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard R (2002) Resilience Management in Social-ecological Systems: A Working Hypothesis for a Participatory Approach. Conservation Ecology 6(1):14 (online), http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14/main.html

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Pahl-Wostl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pahl-Wostl, C. Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manage 21, 49–62 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adaptive water management
  • Social learning
  • Transition processes
  • Water management regimes
  • Global change