Water Resources Management

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 3–18 | Cite as

Shift in thinking to address the 21st century hunger gap

Moving focus from blue to green water management
Original Article

Abstract

The present water policy debate is dominated by the 30 yr old mission to secure water supply and sanitation to all people. The water needed to produce a nutritionally acceptable diet for one person is however 70 times as large as the amount needed for domestic water supply. The food security dilemma is largest in arid climate regions, a situation constituting a formidable challenge. It is suggested that an additional 5 600 km3/yr of consumptive water use will be needed to produce an adequate amount of food by 2050 – i.e almost a doubling of today’s consumptive use of 6800 km3/yr. Past misinterpretations and conceptual deficiencies show the importance of a shift in thinking. Combining the scale of the challenge and the time scale of the efforts to feed humanity and eradicate hunger leads to an impression of great urgency. This urgency strengthens the call for international research both for supporting agricultural upgrading, and for much better handling of issues of environmental sustainability. What stands out is the need of a new generation of water professionals, able to handle complexity and able to incorporate water implications of land use and of ecosystem health in integrated water resources management. It will for those reasons be essential and urgent to upgrade the educational system to producing this new generation.

Keywords

Water perceptions Consumptive water use Global food security Water losses Rainwater partitioning Blue water Green water Hydroclimatic differences Environmental sustainability Water management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow K et al. (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science 268:520–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Conway G (1997) The doubly green revolution. Food for all in the twenty-first century. Penguin Books, USA, p 334Google Scholar
  3. Duda AM (2003) Integrated management of land and water resources based on collective approach to fragmented international conventions. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society London B 358:2051–2062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Falkenmark M (2003) Freshwater as shared between society and ecosystems: from divided approaches to integrated challenges. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society London B 358:2037–2049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falkenmark M (2005) Water usability degradation – Economist wisdom or societal madness? Water International 30:136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Falkenmark M, Lindh G (1976) Water for a starving world. WestView Press, Boulder, Colorado, p. 201Google Scholar
  7. Falkenmark M, Chapman T (eds) (1989) Comparative Hydrology – An ecological approach to land and water resources. Unesco, Paris, France, p 475Google Scholar
  8. Falkenmark M, Rockström J (2004) Balancing water for humans and nature. The new approach in ecohydrology. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Falkenmark M, Lannerstad (2005) Consumptive water use to feed humanity – Curing a blindspot. Hydrology and Earth Sciences, 15–18Google Scholar
  10. FAO (2000) New dimensions in water security. In: Lundqvist J (ed) AGL/MISC/25/2000. FAO RomeGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO (2003) World Agriculture: towards 2015/2030. In: Bruisma J (ed) Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster SSD, Chilton PJ (2003) Groundwater: the processes and global significance of aquifer degradation. Philosophical Transactions, Royal Society London B 358:1957–1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gleick P (1996) Basic water requirements for human activities. Meeting basic needs. Water International 21:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gleick P (2000) The World's Water 2000–2001. The biennial report on freshwater resources. Island Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordon L, Dunlop M, Foran B (2003) Land cover change and water vapour flows: learning from Australia. Philosophical Transactions, Royal Society London B 358:1973–1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. GWP (2003) Water management and ecosystems. Living with change. TEC Background Report No.9. Global Water Partnership, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  17. Hekstra GP (1995) Delayed effects of pollutants in soils and sediments: understanding and handling of chemical time bombs in Europe. Ecoscript 56. Stichtung Mondiaal Alternatiet,AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacks G (2004) Personal communication. Professor Gunnar Jacks, Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  19. Lannerstad M (2001) Consumptive water use feeds the world and makes rivers run dry. MSc thesis, TRITA-LWR 02-13, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), StockholmGoogle Scholar
  20. Lvovich MI (1979) World water resources and their future, (Translation by the American Geophysical Union). LithoCrafters Inc., Chelsea, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  21. Millstone E, Lang T (2003) The atlas of food. Who eats what, where and why. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Moench M, Burke J, Moench Y (2003) Rethinking the approach to groundwater and food security. FAO Water Report 24, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  23. Oki T, Kanae S (2004) Virtual water trade and world water resources. In: Drainage basin security – Balancing production, trade and water use. Stockholm Water Symposium 2003. Water Science and Technology 49:203–209Google Scholar
  24. Pielou EC (1998) Fresh water. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. Rockström J (2001) Green water security for the food makers of tomorrow: windows of oppportunity in drought-prone savannahs. In: Water security for the 21st century – Innovative approaches. Stockholm Water Symposium 2000. Water Science and Technology 43:71–78Google Scholar
  26. Rockström J, Rouw de A (1997) Water, nutrients, and slope position in on-farm pearl millet cultivation in the Sahel. Plant and Soil 195:311–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rockström J (2003) Water for food and nature in drought-pronme tropics: vapour shift in rainfed agriculture. Philosophical Transactions, Royal Society London B 358:1997–2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rockström J, Gordon L, Falkenmark M, Folke C, Engwall M (1999) Humanity's dependence on water vapour flows for terestrial ecosystem services and food production. Conservation Ecology 3:5. On line.http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art5
  29. Rockström J, Barron J (2004) Water productivity in rainfed systems: Overview of challenges and analysis of opportunities in water scarcity prone savannas. Special issue. Irrigation Science(forthcoming)Google Scholar
  30. Rockström J, Falkenmark M (2000) Semi-arid crop production from a hydrological perspective – Gap between potential and actual yields. Critical Rev Plant Sc 19:319–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosegrant MW, Cai SA, Cline Nakagawa N (2002)The Role of Rainfed Agriculture in the Future of Global Food Production. Environment and Production. Technology Division Discussion Paper No. 90. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosegrant MV, Cai X, Cline SA (2002) World water and food by 2025. IFPRI, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. Scanlon J (2004) Negotiating tradeoffs between competing water claims – the critical role of ‘environmental flows’ in basin management. In: Drainage basin mangement – Regional approaches for food and urban security. Stockholm Water Symposium 16–20 August, 2004, Abstract volume. Stockholm International Water Institute, Stockholm, pp 235–236Google Scholar
  34. Shah T, Roy AD, Qurershi AS, Wang J (2003) Sustaining Asia's groundwater boom: an overview of issues and evidence. Natural Resources Forum 27:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shiklomanov IA (2000) Appraisal and assessment of world water resources. Water International 25:11–32Google Scholar
  36. SIWI, IWMI, IFPRI, IUCN (2005) Let it reign: the new water paradigm for global food security. Final Report to CSD 13. Stockholm International Water Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  37. Smakthin V, Revenga C, Döll P (2004) Taking into account environmental water requirements in global-scale water resources assessments. Comprehensive Assessment Research. Report 2. IWMI, Colombo, SriLankaGoogle Scholar
  38. Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, D'Antonmio C, Dobson A, Howarth R, Schindler D, Schlesinger WH, Simberloff D, Swackhamer D (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vogel WR, Grath J (1998) Groundwater in Europe – State and trends in quality and quantity. In: Hilding-Rydevik T, Johansson I (eds) How to cope with degrading groundwater quality in Europe. Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research. Stockholm, FRN-Report 98:4Google Scholar
  40. WWAP (2005) Currents – news from the World Water Assessment Programme. Issue no 13, February 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations