Abstract
Recently, the U.S. EPA issued the 303(d) list of impaired waters in Idaho State that contained the causes of impairment. This 303(d) list provides useful information that can be used to determine the Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Implementation of TMDLs should result in pollutant reductions, which, in turn can lead to the restoration of these water bodies. Flow alteration is one of the potential sources of impairments in the Big Lost River in south-central Idaho, which have some negative impacts on the water quality and beneficial uses. Flow in the Big Lost River is altered, both in quantity and quality, and this reduces recreation activities, affects the fish assemblage, and changes the composition and relative abundance of aquatic species. The effect of riparian vegetation is another factor that needs to be predicted. In addition, three conservation schemes (construction of upstream reservoirs, downstream reservoirs, and canal linings) were proposed to restore flow in the downstream reaches of the river and compensate for water loss during the low flood seasons. However, there is no single predictive model that can be used to appropriately represent each of these issues as management decisions. In this paper, an expert system in the form of a Bayesian network, a graphical diagram of nodes and arcs, was implemented to examine all significant water management variables and relationships among these variables. Lining the irrigation canals was found to be the best scheme, followed by constructing an upstream reservoir. The TMDLs would benefit the water quality in the watershed but would not significantly increase the water quantity and solve the flow alteration problem. Consequently, this can be used to determine the sequence of decisions that can be taken in the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreassen, S. K., Olesen, K. G., Jensen, F. V., and Jensen, F., 1989, ‘HUGIN: A shell for building Bayesian belief universes for expert systems’, in The Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit, Michigan, pp. 1080–1085.
Bagley, J. M., Larson, D. T., and Kapaloski, L., 1983, ‘Adapting appropriation water law to accommodate equitable consideration of in-stream flow uses’, UWRL/P-83/06, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
Bates, S. C. and Raftery, A. E., 2001, ‘An efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo proposal distribution for ridge-like target distributions using nearest neighbors’, submitted to J. of Computational and Graphical Stat.
Berger, J. O., 1985, Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Borsuk, M. E., Stow, C. A., and Reckhow, K. H., 2003, ‘A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis’, Ecological Modelling 173, 219–239.
Clesceri, L., Greenberg, A., and Eaton, A., 2001, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edition, AWWA, APHA, and WEF, Washington, D.C.
Copeland, C., 2002, Water Quality: Implementing the Clean Water Act, available at: http://www.policyalmanac.org/environment/archive/crs_water_quality.shtml.
Crosthwaite, E. G., Thomas, C. A., and Dyer, K. L., 1970a, Considerations for water use and management in the Big Lost River Basin, Idaho, A Supplement Report., Open File Report, 15 p., U.S. Geological Survey, Boise, Idaho.
Crosthwaite, E. G., Thomas, C. A., and Dyer, K. L., 1970b, ‘Water resources in the Big Lost River Basin, south-central Idaho’, Open File Report, 109 p., U.S. Geol. Surv., Boise, Idaho.
Debler, E. B., Volk, K. Q. Lippincott, J. B., Crandall, L., Thompson, R. W., and Carter, G. N., 1931, Board of engineer's report, Big Lost River, Butte County Soil Cons. Surv., Arco, Idaho.
Draper, D., 1995, ‘Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty’, J. of the Royal Stat. Soc. 57(1), 45–97.
HUGIN Expert Systems, 2000, HUGIN software, available at: http://www.hugin.dk/.
IDEQ, 1996, Water Body Assessment Guidance: A Stream to Standards Process, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Boise, Idaho.
IDEQ, 1998, 303(d) List. Id. Department of Environmental Quality, Boise, Idaho.
Irving, R. N., 1955, Soil Conservation Survey, Water Conservation Review, Big Lost River, Idaho.
Jensen, J., 1982, Big Lost River Water Quality Management Plan, Butte Soil Conservation District, 33 pp., Arco, Idaho.
Johnson, G. S., Ralston, D. R., and Mink, L. L., 1991, ‘Ground water pumping impacts on surface water irrigation diversions from Big Lost River’, Idaho Water Resour. Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 97 p.
Kundzewicz, Z. W. and Somlyódy, L. 1997, ‘Climatic change impact on water resources in a systems perspective’, Water Resources Management 11(6): 407–435.
Kwon, I., 1978, Statistical Decision Theory with Business and Economic Applications: A Bayesian Approach. Modern Decision Analysis Series, 278 p., Mason/Charter Publishing, New York.
Murtrey, B., 1961, Preliminary investigation report, Big Lost River Watersheds, Butte and Custer SCD's, Idaho, Butte County Soil Conservation Survey, Arco, Idaho.
Narayanan, R., Larson, D. T., Bishop, A. B., and Amirfathi, P., 1983, An Economic Evaluation of Benefits and Costs of Maintaining In-Stream Flows. Water Resources Planning Series, UWRL/P-83/04, 48 pp., Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
NCRS, 2000, Flow measurement on segment of the Burnett Ditch, field report, Butte County Soil Cons. Surv., Arco, Idaho.
Reckhow, K. H., 1999, ‘Water quality prediction and probability network models’, Can. J. of Fish. and Aquat. Sci. 56, 1150–1158.
Said, A., Stevens D. K., and Sehlke, G., 2005, ‘Estimating water budget in a regional aquifer using HSPF-MODFLOW integrated model’, J. of the Am. Water Res. Assoc. 41(1): 55–66.
Sangüesa, R. and Burrell, P., 2000, ‘Application of Bayesian network learning methods to waste water treatment plants’, Applied Intelligence, 13, 19–40.
Sloan, W. G., 1930, Summary of Big Lost River valley reorganization plan, Butte County Soil Conservation Survey, Arco, Idaho.
Steyvers, M., Tenenbaum, J. B., Wagenmakers, E. J., and Blumd, B., 2003, ‘Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions’, Cognitive Science 27, 453–489.
Stockton, T. and Black, P., 2000, ‘Environmental modeling and Bayesian analysis for assessing human health impacts from radioactive contamination’, In iNTERFACE 32nd Symposium on the Interface: Computing Science and Statistics Modeling the Earth's Systems: Physical to Infrastructural, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Stow, C. A., Borsuk, M. E., and Reckhow, K. H., 2002, ‘TMDL development in the Neuse River watershed: An imperative for adaptive management’, Water Resources Update 122, 16–26.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1991, Feasibility report, Big Lost River Basin, Idaho, Upper Snake River and tributaries, Walla Walla District, Washington.
U.S. EPA, 1990, Country-Level Fertilizer Sales Data, Policy Planning and Evaluation, PM-221. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, D.C.
Varis O. and Fraboulet-Jussila, S., 2002, ‘Water resources development in the lower senegal river basin: Conflicting interests, environmental concerns and policy options’, International J. of Water Resour. Develop. 18(2), 245–260.
WCFSP, 2002, Canal Lining Program, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Water Conservation Field Services Program, available at: http://www.pn.usbr.gov/project/wat/programs/canal/.
Williamson, S. H., 2003, What is the relative value? Economic History Services, available at: http://www.eh.net/hmit/compare/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Said, A. The Implementation of a Bayesian Network for Watershed Management Decisions. Water Resour Manage 20, 591–605 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-3088-z
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-3088-z