Skip to main content
Log in

Tank Model for Sediment Yield

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A tank model consisting of three tanks was developed for prediction of runoff and sediment yield. The sediment yield of each tank was computed by multiplying the total sediment yield by the sediment yield coefficients; the yield was obtained by the product of the runoff of each tank and the sediment concentration in the tank. The sediment concentration of the first tank was computed from its storage and the sediment concentration distribution (SCD); the sediment concentration of the next lower tank was obtained by its storage and the sediment infiltration of the upper tank; and so on. The SCD, caused by the incremental source runoff (or the effective rainfall), was obtained by the theory of the instantaneous unit sediment graph (IUSG) and a sediment routing function. Using the SCD, the sediment yield was computed from the tank model as well as by the IUSG model. The sediment yield obtained from the tank model was then compared with that from the IUSG model. Finally, the tank model was verified on an upland watershed in northwestern Mississippi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowie, A. J. and Bolton, G. C., 1972 ‘Variations in runoff and sediment yields of two a djacent watersheds as influenced by hydrologic and physical characteristics’, Proceedings, Mississippi Water Resources Conference, Water Resources Research Institute, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, pp. 37–55.

  • Chen, V. J. and Kuo, C. Y., 1984 ‘A study of synthetic sediment graphs for ungaged watersheds,’ J. Hydrol. 84, 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. H. and Singh, V. P., 1999 ‘Prediction of sediment yield by coupling kalman filter with instantaneous unit sediment graph’, Hydrolog. Process. 2861–2875.

  • Nash, J. E. 1957 ‘The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph’, Publ. 42. International Association of Scientific Hydrology, Wallingford, England, pp. 114–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. E. 1958 ‘Determining runoff from rainfall,’ Proceeding of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Ireland, vol. 10, pp. 163–184.

  • Nash, J. E. 1959 ‘Systematic determination of unit hydrograph parameters,’ J. Geophys. Res. 64(1), 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. E. 1960 ‘A unit hydrograph study with particular reference to British catchments’, Proceeding of the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, vol. 17, pp. 249–282.

  • Rendon-Herrero, O., 1974 ‘Estimation of wash load produced on certain small watersheds,’ J. Hydraul. Div., Proc. ASCE 100(HY), 835–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendon-Herrero, O., 1978 ‘Unit sediment graph,’ Water Resour. Res. 14(5), 889–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. P. (ed.), 1982 Applied Modeling in Catchment Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. P., Baniukiwicz, A., and Chen V. J., 1982 ‘An Instantaneous Unit Sediment Graph Study for Small Upland Watersheds,’ Water Resources Publications, Littieton, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. P., 1988 Hydrologic Systems: Vol. 1, ‘Rainfall-Runoff Modeling,’ Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. P., 1989 Hydrologic Systems: Vol. 2, ‘Watershed Modeling,’ Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. P., 1992 Elementary Hydrology, Prentice-Hall, pp. 731–735.

  • Srivastava, P. K., Rastogi, R. A. and Chanhan, H. S., 1984 ‘Prediction of storm sediment yield from a small watershed’, J. Agri. Engin. 21(1–2), 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara, M., 1979 ‘Automatic calibration of the tank model’, Hydrolo. Sci. Bull. 24, 375–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara, M., 1995 ‘Tank model’, in V. P. Singh, (ed.),Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara, M., Watanabe, I., Ozaki, E. and Katsuyama, Y., 1984 ‘Tank model with snow component’, Research Notes, No. 65, National research Center for Disaster Prevention, Japan.

  • Williams, J. R., 1975a ‘Sediment routing for agriculture watersheds,’ Water Resour. Bull. 11(5), 965–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. R., 1975b ‘Sediment yield prediction with universal equation using runoff energy factor’, in Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yields and Sources, ARS-S-40, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C., pp. 244–252.

  • Williams, J. R., 1978a ‘A Sediment yield routing model,’ Proceedings of the Specialty Conference on Verification of Mathematical and Physical Models in Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, August 9–11, pp. 662–670.

  • Williams, J. R., 1978b ‘A sediment graph model based on an instantaneous unit sediment graph’, Water Resour. Res. 14(4), 659–664.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. P. Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, Y.H., Singh, V.P. Tank Model for Sediment Yield. Water Resour Manage 19, 349–362 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-7998-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-7998-y

Key words

Navigation