Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of Design Flood Hydrograph for an Ungauged Watershed

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the physiographical features of the studied watershed of 102.5 km2 in northern Ontario and the meteorological data of one nearby climatic station, through the combination of the regionalization of flood and the HEC-1 modeling, this article presents an approach that may be used to determine the desired peak flows for the ungauged watershed. The empirical equations used to determine the desired peak flows were developed by the Cumming Cockburn Ltd. (CCL) who has carried out the studies on flood regionalization by using flow data at 380 gauging stations in Ontario. CCL has proposed four methods to estimate peak flows, namely 1) regression method describing multiple linear relationships between flood flow and related parameters; 2) index flood frequency curve; 3) regional flood frequency curve and 4) isoline map for unit peak flow. The desired peak flows for studied watershed determined by CCL methods were used to calibrate the HEC-1 model for the rainfall-runoff simulation for this watershed which consists of 15 subwatersheds. Through slight adjustment in the CN number used in the HEC-1 model, the calibrated HEC-1 model could be used for rainfall-runoff simulation for this ungauged watershed. This approach could be recommended for hydrological design and watershed management for ungauged watersheds provided the analyses of flood regionalization could be conducted. In addition, comparing to the Bavaria forest region, Germany, some questions have been discussed in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, C. L. and Gibbons, C. J., 1996, ‘Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator’, J. Am. Planning Assoc. 62, 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigham Young University, 2002, Watershed Modeling System – WMS7.0 User Mannuals, Environmental Modeling Research Laboratory, Brigham Young University.

  • Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R. and Mays, L. W., 1988, Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill Book Company.

  • Cumming Cockburn Ltd. (CCL), 1999, Flood Reginalization for Ontario, Ministry of Natural Resources.

  • Eaton, B., Church, M. and Ham, D., 2002, ‘Scaling and regionalization of flood flows in British Columbia, Canada’, Hydrol. Processes 16, 3245–3263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Famiglietti, J. S. and Wood, E. F., 1994, ‘Multi-scale modeling of spatially variable water and energy balance processes’, Water Resourc. Res. 30, 3061–3078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F., 1992, ‘Scientific basis for new perspectives in forests and streams’, in R. J. Naiman (ed.), Watershed Management, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 25–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, I. D. and Grayson, R. B., 1991, ‘Terrain based prediction of runoff with vector elevation data’, Water Resourc. Res. 27, 1177–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemani, R., Pierce, L. L., Running, S. W. and Band, L. E., 1993, ‘Ecological processes at the watershed scale: Sensitivity to remotely sensed leaf area index estimates’, Int. J. Remote Sens. 14, 2519–2534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, G. R., 1998, ‘Assessment of scaling behavior of regional floods’, J. Hydrol. Eng. 3, 169–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeito, J. and Rousselle, J., 1996, ‘Robust simple scaling analysis of flood peak series’, Can. J. Civil Eng. 23, 1139–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, N. E., Allan, J. D. and Erickson, D. L., 1996, ‘Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple scales’, Landscape Ecol. 11, 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. P., 1995, ‘Watershed modeling’, in V. P. Singh (ed.), Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, Colorado, pp. 1–22.

  • Spanner, M. A., Pierce, L. L., Peterson, D. L. and Running, S. W., 1990, ‘Remote sensing of temperate forest leaf area index: Influence of canopy closure, understory vegetation and background reflectance’, Int. J. Remote Sensing 11, 96–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui, J., 1998, Hochwasserabflüsse aus Regen und Schnee in Mittelgebirgs-Einzugs-gebieten am Beispiel von Nordbayern, Series Publications, No. 8, 191 pp., ISSN1433-4860, FG Wasserbau und Wasserwirtschaft, (Technische) Universität Kaiserslautern, Germany.

  • Wigmosta, M. S., Vail, L. W. and Lettenmier, D. P., 1994, ‘A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain’, Water Resourc. Res. 30, 1665–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. F., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K. and Band, L., 1988, ‘Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling’, J. Hydrol. 102, 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Engineering, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada, V2N 4Z9

    Jueyi Sui

Authors
  1. Jueyi Sui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jueyi Sui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sui, J. Estimation of Design Flood Hydrograph for an Ungauged Watershed. Water Resour Manage 19, 813–830 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-6812-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-6812-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation