Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utility of Ten-Day Climate Model Ensemble Simulations for Water Resources Applications in Korean Watersheds

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We demonstrate the use of a quantitative measure of the effectiveness of using climate model simulations of surface precipitation and temperature for water resources applications involving extremes of watershed average precipitation and temperature, and watershed discharge. This diagnostic measure is considered in association with the use of climate information to condition ensemble seasonal predictions of watershed variables. Seven watersheds in the Korean peninsula constitute the application sites. The climate model effectiveness is expressed by a utility index EP that measures the ability of the climate model simulations of an indicator variable (i.e., nodal precipitation or temperature) to discriminate observed distributions of the highs and lows of a watershed target variable (i.e., mean areal precipitation and temperature as well as outlet discharge). Monte Carlo simulations provide estimates of the significance of the Ep values. For apparently the first time, ten-member ensemble simulations of daily surface precipitation and temperature from the Korean Meteorological Agency climate model are used to evaluate the climate-model utility index EP for a temporal interval of 10 days for each application watershed. The results show that, in spite of the high uncertainty of climate simulations, there are several Korean watersheds that can benefit from the use of climate model simulations of high temporal resolution for planning and management studies that involve precipitation, temperature and discharge. In particular, seasonal ensemble prediction of watershed variables stands to gain from conditioning on high-temporal resolution climate forecasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Back, S.-K., Ryu, J.-H., and Ryoo, S.-B., 2002, ‘Analysis of the CO2 doubling experiment using METRI AGCM, PART 1: The Characteristics of Regional and Seasonal Climate Responses’, J. Korean Meteor. Soc. 38(5), 465–477 (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. M. and Georgakakos, K. P. 2001, ‘Assessment of Folsom Lake response to historical and potential future climate scenarios, 1, Forecasting’, J. Hydrol. 249, 148–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S.-C., 2002, ‘Model mismatch between global and regional simulations’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29(5), 4-1–4-4; DOI: 10.1029/2001GL013570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot, M. H., 1975, Probability and Statistics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp. 463–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgakakos, A. P., Mullusky, M. G., Yao, H., and Georgakakos, K. P., 1998, ‘Impacts of climate variability on the operational forecast and management of the upper Des Moines River basin’, Water Resour. Res. 34(4), 799–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgakakos, K. P., 2003, ‘Probabilistic climate-model diagnostics for hydrologic and water resources impact studies’, J. Hydrometeorol. 4, 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgakakos, K. P., Graham, N. E., and Georgakakos, A. P., 2000, ‘Can forecasts accrue benefits for reservoir management? The Folsom Lake study’, Climate Rep. 1(4), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgakakos, K. P., Seo, D.-J., Gupta, H., Schaake, J., and Butts, M. B., 2004, ‘Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles’, J. Hydrol. 298, 222–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, L., Mason, S. J., Zebiak, S. E., Ropelewski, C. F., Basher, R., and Cane, M. A. 2001, ‘Current approaches to seasonal-to-interannual climate predictions’, Int. J. Climatol. 21, 1111–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, C. S., Heo, J.-H., Bae, D.-H., and Georgakakos, K. P., 2005, ‘Utility of high-resolution climate model simulations for water resources prediction over the Korean peninsula: A sensitivity study’, Hydrol. Sci. J. 50(1), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharin, V. V. and Zwiers, F. W. 2000, ‘Changes in the extremes in an ensemble of transient climate simulations with a coupled atmosphere-ocean GCM’, J. Climate 13, 3760–3788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzysztofowicz, R., 1999, ‘Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model’, Water Resour. Res. 35, 2739–2750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz, Z. W. and Somlyódy, L. 1997, ‘Climatic change impact on water resources in a systems perspective’, Water Resour. Manage. 11(6), 407–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livezey, R. E. and Chen, W. Y. 1983, ‘Statistical field significance and its determination by Monte Carlo techniques’, Mon. Weather Rev. 111(1), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, G. A., Karl, T., Easterling, D. R., Changnon, S., Pielke, R. Jr., Changnon, D., Evans, J., Groisman, P. Y., Knutson, T. R., Kunkel, K. E., Mearns, L. O., Parmesan, C., Pulwarty, R., Root, T., Sylves, R. T., Whetton, P., and Zwiers, F., 2000, ‘An introduction to trends in extreme weather and climate events, observations, socioeconomic impacts, terrestrial ecological impacts, and model projections’, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81(3), 413–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J., 1999, ‘An evaluation of statistical and dynamical techniques for downscaling local climate’, J. Climate 12, 2256–2284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P., 1992, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN, The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, New York, 963p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, J. and others, 2000, ‘Dynamical seasonal prediction’, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81, 2593–2606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. A., Day, G. N., and Kane, M. D. 1991, ‘A nonparametric framework for long-range streamflow forecasting'. WMO/TD-428, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 28p.

  • Stephens, M. A., 1970, ‘Use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramer-Von Mises and related statistics without extensive tables’, J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B 32(1), 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. and Easterling, W. E. (eds.), 1999, Making Climate Forecasts Matter, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 192p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. L. and Zwiers, F. W., 1999, ‘Interannual variability of precipitation in an ensemble of AMIP climate simulations conducted with the CCC GCM2’, J. Climate 12, 1322–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C., 1999, ‘Climate change and hydrologic models, A review of existing gaps and recent research developments’, Water Resour. Manage. 13(5), 369–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, H. and Georgakakos, A. P., 2001, ‘Assessment of Folsom Lake response to historical and potential future climate scenarios, 2, Reservoir management’, J. Hydrol. 249, 176–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantine P. Georgakakos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Georgakakos, K.P., Bae, DH. & Jeong, CS. Utility of Ten-Day Climate Model Ensemble Simulations for Water Resources Applications in Korean Watersheds. Water Resour Manage 19, 849–872 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-5605-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-5605-x

Keywords

Navigation