Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Critical Load Exceedance and Its Uncertainty Based on National and Site-specific Data

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus

Abstract

Critical loads have been used to develop international agreements on acidifying air pollution abatement, and within the UK and other countries, to develop national policies for pollution abatement. The Environment Agency (England and Wales) has regulatory obligations to protect sites of high conservation value from the threat of acidification, and hence requires a practical methodology for acidification assessments at the site-specific scale. The Environment Agency has therefore posed the question: Are the national critical load exceedance models sufficiently robust to form the basis for methods to assess harm to individual sites or are they only useful for national policy development? In order to provide one measure of the appropriateness of applying the models at the site-specific scale we incorporated estimates of uncertainty in both national and site-specific data into the calculation of critical load exceedance for individual sites. The exceedance calculations use data from a wide range of sources and the accuracy of the exceedance will be influenced by the accuracy of the input data sets. Using Monte Carlo methods to incorporate the uncertainty in the input data sets into the calculation a distribution of critical load exceedance values is generated rather than a single point estimate. This paper compares uncertainty analyses for coniferous forested sites in England and Wales using both national scale and site-specific data sets and uncertainty ranges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, J., Hayman, G., Vincent, K., Metcalfe, S., Dore, T., Skeffington R., et al. (2002). Uncertainty in acid deposition modelling and critical load assessments, R&D Technical Report P4-083(5)/1, AEA Technology plc, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, OX13 3ED.

  • Fournier, N., Dore, A. J., Vieno, M., Weston, K. J., Dragosits, U., & Sutton, M. A. (2004). Modelling the deposition of atmospheric oxidised nitrogen and sulphur to the United Kingdom using a multi-layer long-range transport model. Atmospheric Environment, 38(5), 683–694.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., Ullyett, J., Heywood, L., Broughton, R., Fawehinmi, J., & 31 UK experts (2003). Status of UK Critical Loads: Critical Loads Methods, Data and Maps, Report to Defra, CEH Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, PE28 2LS. http://critloads.ceh.ac.uk.

  • Hall, J., Ullyett, J., Wadsworth, R., & Reynolds, B. (2007). The applicability of national critical loads data in assessing designated sites. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Focus, doi:10.1007/s11267-006-9091-9.

  • Heywood, E., Hall, J., & Reynolds, B. (2006). A review of uncertainties in the inputs to critical loads of acidity and nutrient nitrogen for woodland habitats. Environmental Science and Policy, 9, 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (1989). Evaluating the reliability of predictions made using environmental transfer models. In IAEA Safety Series 100, Vienna, Austria.

  • Langan, S. J., Reynolds, B., & Bain, D. C. (1996). The calculation of base cation release from mineral weathering in soils derived from palaeozoic greywackes and shales in upland UK. Geoderma, 69, 275–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, J., & Grennfelt, P. (1988). Critical Loads for Sulphur and Nitrogen, NORD 1998:97, Nordic Council of Mionisters, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 418

  • Reynolds, B., Wislon, E. J., & Emmett, B. A. (1998). Evaluating critical loads of nutrient nitrogen and acidity for terrestrial sysems using ecosystem-scale experiments (NITREX). Forest Ecology and Management, 101, 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, R. Y. (1981). Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singles, R., Sutton, M. A., & Weston, K. J. (1998). A multi-layer model to describe the atmospheric transport and deposition of ammonia in Great Britain. Atmospheric Environment, 32, 393–399.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skeffington, R., Hall, J., Heywood, L., Wadsworth, R., Whitehead, P., Reynolds, B. et al. (2006a). Estimating uncertainty in critical load assessment models. [Acidification and annual audits], Final report to the Environment Agency, R&D Project P4-120/4, CEH Monks Wood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeffington, R. A., Whitehead, P. J., & Abbott, J. (2006b). Quantifying uncertainty in critical loads: (B) acidity mass balance critical loads on a sensitive site. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 169, 25–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup, H., & De Vries, W. (1994). Calculating critical loads with the simple mass balance method. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 72, 143–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Environment Agency (E&W) for their contribution to the funding of this research. However, the views expressed are those of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liz Heywood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heywood, L., Skeffington, R., Whitehead, P. et al. Comparison of Critical Load Exceedance and Its Uncertainty Based on National and Site-specific Data. Water Air Soil Pollut: Focus 7, 391–397 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11267-006-9082-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11267-006-9082-x

Keywords

Navigation