Abstract
This paper investigates how volunteer managers from Roskilde Festival experience, enact, and respond to organisational paradoxes and how these paradoxes are both formed by, and sustain, the organisational context of the festival. The festival is a professional world-class event with high standards of performance, while being primarily volunteer-driven. This constitutes a context of “professional volunteerism”, which serves as a locus of interwoven paradoxical tensions. Paradox is often portrayed as a pair of poles that are connected, but in opposition, this paper illustrates how different paradoxes and the responses to them can be interwoven, thereby describing a more complex understanding of paradox.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
Beech, N., Burns, H., De Caestecker, L., MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. (2004). Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations, 57(10), 1313–1332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704048357
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brudney, J. L., & Meijs, L. C. P. M. (2014). Models of volunteer management: Professional volunteer program management in social work. Human Service Organizations Management, Leadership and Governance, 38(3), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2014.899281
Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.539
Chadwick-Coule, T. (2011). Social dynamics and the strategy process: Bridging or creating a divide between trustees and staff? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009354646
Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2014). Doing action research in your own organization (4th editio). SAGE.
Connors, T. D. (Ed.). (2012). The volunteer management handbook: Leadership strategies for success (2nd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118386194
la Cour, A. (2019). The management quest for authentic relationships in voluntary social care. Journal of Civil Society, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2018.1551864
Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.5.524
Fairhurst, G. T., Smith, W. K., Banghart, S. G., Lewis, M. W., Putnam, L. L., Raisch, S., & Schad, J. (2016). Diverging and converging: Integrative insights on a paradox meta-perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1162423
Festicket Magazine. (2019). https://www.festicket.com/magazine/discover/top-50-best-music-festivals-world/
Festival Insights. (2019). Festival 250: 2018. http://www.festivalinsights.com/2019/09/festival-250-2018/
Fricke, D. (2000). Nine dead at pearl jam concert - mosh pit tragedy at Denmark’s Roskilde festival. Rolling Stone.
Goodall, R. (2000). Organising cultures: Voluntarism and professionalism in UK charity shops. Voluntary Action, 3(1), 43–57.
Grant, A. M., Christianson, M. K., & Price, R. H. (2007). Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2007.26421238
Hager, M. A., & Brudney, J. L. (2015). In search of strategy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21123
Hedegaard, J. (n.d.). Navigating organisational hybridity through dynamic balancing: How Roskilde Festival translates strategic governance into operational management. 1–23.
Ho, H., & Kuvaas, B. (2019). Human resource management systems, employee well-being, and firm performance from the mutual gains and critical perspectives: The well-being paradox. Human Resource Management, 59(3), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21990
Hulgård, L., & Andersen, L. L. (2018). Reconfiguring the social and solidarity economy in a Danish/Nordic welfare context: 3rd EMES-Polanyi International Seminar. Welfare societies in transition. Polanyi revisited through the lens of welfare state, social democracy and solidarity economy. Afhandling Præsenteret På EMES-Polanyi International Seminar, Roskilde, Danmark.
Jäger, U., Kreutzer, K., & Beyes, T. (2009). Balancing acts: NPO-leadership and volunteering. Financial Accountability & Management, 25(February), 79–97.
Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J. K., & van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 245–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013481016
Kreutzer, K., & Jäger, U. (2011). Volunteering versus managerialism: Conflict over organizational identity in voluntary associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 634–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010369386
La Cour, A., & Højlund, H. (2008). Voluntary social work as a paradox. Acta Sociologica, 51(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699307086817
Lê, J., & Bednarek, R. (2017). Paradox in everyday practice: Applying practice-theoretical principles to paradox. In M. Lewis, W. K. Smith, P. Jarzabkowski, & A. Langley (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox (pp. 490–509). Oxford University Press.
Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314522322
Loon, M., Otaye-Ebede, L., & Stewart, J. (2019). The paradox of employee psychological well-being practices: An integrative literature review and new directions for research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(1), 156–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1479877
Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240.
Mair, J., Mayer, J., & Lutz, E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, 36(6), 713–739.
McAllum, K. (2018). Volunteers as boundary workers: Negotiating tensions between volunteerism and professionalism in nonprofit organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(4), 534–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918792094
McNamee, L. G., & Peterson, B. L. (2014). Reconciling “third space/place”: Toward a complementary dialectical understanding of volunteer management. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 214–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914525472
Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Van Dick, R. (2006). Social identities and commitments at work; toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.383
Mills, P. K., & Ungson, G. R. (2003). Reassessing the limits of structural empowerment: Organizational constitution and trust as controls. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.8925254
Pearce, J. L. (1993). Volunteers: The organizational behavior of unpaid workers. Routledge.
Porter, C. O. L. H., Webb, J. W., & Gogus, C. I. (2010). when goal orientations collide: Effects of learning and performance orientation on team adaptability in response to workload imbalance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 935–943. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019637
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach†. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421
Roskilde Festival. (2022). http://www.Roskilde-Festival.Dk/. http://www.roskilde-festival.dk/
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1162422
Smith, W. K., Besharov, M. L., Wessels, A. K., & Chertok, M. (2012). A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 463–478.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.59330958
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.5465/256865
Steimel, S. (2018). Skills-based volunteering as both work and not work: A tension-centered examination of constructions of “volunteer.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9859-8
Studer, S. (2016). Volunteer management: Responding to the uniqueness of volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4), 688–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764015597786
Acknowledgements
I am very grateful to Professor Linda Lundgaard Andersen from Roskilde University who provided valuable feedback and critical comments. I would also like to thank both volunteers and employees of Roskilde Festival who participated in this study, and the funders of my research: Roskilde Festival and the Innovation Fond Denmark.
Funding
This study was funded partially by Innovation Fund Denmark (grant number 7038-00171B), and partially by Roskilde Festival (the author was a salaried employee).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author was a salaried employee at the company Roskilde Kulturservice A/S which is the legal entity behind Roskilde Festival. Half of his salary was provided by this organisation, the other half by Innovation Fund Denmark. The author declare that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix: Informant data
Most informant data have been anonymised, in order to provide as much confidentiality as possible.
Executive board of directors | ||
---|---|---|
Position | Organisational status | Gender |
Chief executive officer | Employee | Female |
Chief financial officer | Employee | Male |
Chief communications officer | Employee | Female |
Divisional management of the Commerce-division | ||
---|---|---|
Position | Organisational status | Gender |
Divisional manager | Employee | Male |
Head of budget & administration | Volunteer | Male |
Head of volunteers and HR | Volunteer | Male |
Head of programmes for food and drink | Employee | Female |
Head of teams 1 | Volunteer | Female |
Head of teams 2 | Volunteer | Male |
Head of teams 3 | Volunteer | Male |
Head of teams 4 | Employee | Male |
Head of teams 5 | Volunteer | Female |
Divisional management of the Communication-division | ||
---|---|---|
Position | Organisational status | Gender |
Divisional manager | Employee | Male |
Head of budget & administration | Volunteer | Male |
Head of volunteers and HR | Volunteer | Female |
Head of Team Information | Volunteer | Female |
Head of Team Press | Volunteer | Male |
Head of Team Media | Volunteer | Male |
Head of Team Campaing and marketing | Volunteer | Male |
Divisional management of the participants-division | ||
---|---|---|
Position | Organisational status | Gender |
Divisional manager | Employee | Male |
Head of budget & administration | Employee | Female |
Head of volunteers and HR | Volunteer | Female |
Head of projects and head of service | Volunteer | Male |
Head of safety and security | Employee | Male |
Head of emergency management | Volunteer | Male |
Head of camping | Volunteer | Male |
Head of flow | Volunteer | Male |
Divisional management of the organisation & culture-division | ||
---|---|---|
Position | Organisational status | Gender |
Divisional manager | Employee | Male |
Head of budget & administration | Volunteer | Male |
Head of volunteers and HR | Volunteer | Female |
Head of programmes for sustainability | Employee | Female |
Head of programmes for culture | Employee | Female |
Head of volunteer facilities | Volunteer | Female |
Head of Team Roskilde Sustainability | Volunteer | Female |
Head of culture | Volunteer | Male |
Divisional management of the Program-division | ||
---|---|---|
Position | Organisational status | Gender |
Divisional manager | Employee | Male |
Head of volunteers and HR | Volunteer | Female |
Head of music | Volunteer | Female |
Head of arts and activism | Employee | Female |
Divisional management of the urban planning & production-division | ||
---|---|---|
Position | Organisational status | Gender |
Divisional manager | Employee | Male |
Head of budget & administration | Volunteer | Male |
Head of volunteers and HR | Volunteer | Male |
Head of RFX projects | Employee | Female |
Head of Urban planning and development | Employee | Male |
Head of logistics and production | Employee | Male |
Head of logistics | Employee | Male |
Head of projects | Employee | Male |
Head of production | Employee | Male |
Head of area—Inner East | Volunteer | Male |
Head of area—Inner West | Volunteer | Male |
Head of area—Outer | Volunteer | Male |
Cross-divisional group of middle managers | |||
---|---|---|---|
Position | Organisational status | Gender | Division |
Team leader | Volunteer | Female | Commerce |
Team leader | Volunteer | Female | Commerce |
Team leader | Volunteer | Male | Commerce |
Group manager | Volunteer | Male | Communication |
Functional manager | Volunteer | Female | Communication |
Group manager | Volunteer | Female | Participants |
Team leader | Volunteer | Male | Organisation & Culture |
Functional manager | Volunteer | Female | Organisation & Culture |
Team leader | Volunteer | Male | Programme |
Functional manager | Volunteer | Male | Programme |
Team leader | Volunteer | Male | Urban Planning & Production |
Team leader | Volunteer | Male | Urban Planning & Production |
Team leaders may have Group managers or Functional managers as subordinates.
Non-managing volunteers from the commerce-division | ||
---|---|---|
Position | Organisational status | Gender |
All year-round volunteer | Volunteer | Male |
All year-round volunteer | Volunteer | Male |
All year-round volunteer | Volunteer | Female |
All year-round volunteer | Volunteer | Female |
All year-round volunteer | Volunteer | Female |
Appendix: Coding of data
First interview | ||
---|---|---|
Theme | Sub-theme | Instances coded |
Ambitions | 7 | |
Chain of command and organisational diagram | 14 | |
Challenges | 1 | |
Commercial focus, economy, and resources | 125 | |
Development and innovation | 21 | |
Employees and their organisational conditions | 36 | |
Evaluation and learning | 2 | |
Hybridity | 126 | |
Responsibility and expectations | 39 | |
The board | 8 | |
Volunteerism | 153 | |
Management of employees and volunteers | ||
Autonomy, involvement, and influence | 57 | |
Complaints, resistance, hierarchy, disagreement | 51 | |
Management, governance, and control | 95 | |
Personal network and informal influence | 8 | |
The divisional management's focus | 60 | |
Meaning | 3 | |
Motivation and engagement | 66 | |
Paradoxes (and dilemmas) | 15 | |
Planning wheel and time | 22 | |
The organisation | ||
Cross-divisional | 23 | |
Organisational change and development | 45 | |
Organisational communication | 19 | |
Strategy | 82 | |
The current division | 7 | |
The goals and tasks of the organisation | 36 | |
The purpose of the organisation | 56 | |
The values of the organisation | 50 | |
Top-down, bottom-up, sideways | 65 |
Values | ||
---|---|---|
Climate | 7 | |
Community | 32 | |
Focus on participants/audience | 14 | |
Local | 3 | |
Non-profit | 41 | |
Orange Feeling | 7 | |
Organic food | 7 | |
Social responsibility and donations | 20 | |
Sustainability | 23 | |
The task of executing the festival | 20 | |
Why, purpose, meaning | 22 |
Later sessions | |||
---|---|---|---|
Theme | Sub-theme | Description/identifiers | Instances coded |
General | 0 | ||
Hybridity and divergent values | Hybridity and tensions/balances | 27 | |
Different values at play: | |||
Economy | |||
Security | |||
Sustainability | |||
Organic food | |||
The participant experience | |||
The volunteer experience | |||
The psycho-social work environment for the employees | |||
Social values | |||
Growth of new musicians | |||
The festival as a unique event | |||
Non-profit | |||
Tensions between levels: | |||
Strategic | |||
Operational | |||
Tactical | |||
Challenges and successes | Challenges/problems/dilemmas | 23 | |
Experiencing success and successful handling of difficult situations |
Paradoxes of belonging | 5 | ||
Diversity, identity, and cultural differences | Diversity as a strength < > diversity as a challenge | 32 | |
Individual < > community—tensions between individual and group/adapting to tensions in a group | |||
Trust < > mistrust to others in the organisation (e.g. towards top management) | |||
Volunteering at RF as identity (more important than work identity) | |||
Roles with contradictory goals and values | |||
When identity is threatened | When identity or roles are in focus or threatened | 20 | |
When changes in the organisation, | |||
values and goals threaten identity and roles | |||
To handle a professional role versus upholding own identity | |||
Unity < > uniqueness | |||
Paradoxes of learning | 7 | ||
Operations and development | Operations < > development | 34 | |
Operations < > project organising | |||
Exploitation < > exploration (/innovation) | |||
Fix it < > learn from it (i.e. learning and knowledge management in a "fixer" culture) | |||
Constant new ideas and expanded task portfolio < > lack of resources (but including the conditions of volunteering where there is no pay involved) | |||
Organisational changes, role changes and organisational mobility | The current organisational wide change project and other large changes | 54 | |
Radical innovation < > incremental innovation | |||
Episodic change < > continuous change | |||
Seeking focus and effectiveness < > to embrace change and be flexible | |||
When your organisational role/identity becomes either an enhancer or a barrier of development and change | |||
Lower entry bars and greater mobility versus a lack of competence and experience (also in management) |
Paradoxes of organising | 28 | ||
Dynamics between processes and results | The strategic direction laid out by top management < > operational execution | 98 | |
Interplay between means and ends/process and result | |||
Differentiation of workflows and processes < > integration of workflows and processes | |||
Systematics and quality control < > spontaneity and volunteer motivation | |||
Implementation of changes and processes < > operations/volunteer motivation | |||
Stories of same task/goal from different angles—differences in processes and workflows | |||
Autonomy and alignment | Autonomy < > alignment | 111 | |
Empowerment < > direction | |||
Flexibility < > control | |||
Leadership < > management | |||
Ownership < > fellowship | |||
Part < > unity (team goals < > organisational goals) | |||
Cooperation < > competition | |||
Paradoxes of performing | 7 | ||
A multitude of stakeholders and divergent goals | Different (divergent) values (e.g. formal/informal) | 67 | |
Criteria for success or the lack of them | |||
Concrete goals or the lack of them | |||
Strategical focus (and contradictions) | |||
Division of focus amongst different divisions (/teams) | |||
Different levels of management involved | |||
Short term < > long term | |||
Well-being and performance | Well-being < > performance | 64 | |
Volunteers that leave or are very critical | |||
Pressure from management | |||
Conflicts/when things are tough | |||
Motivation for volunteers—what drives them and when does this come under pressure? | |||
Psycho-social work environment | |||
Reflections on "good" management and performance |
*The use of “ < > ” denotes a tension between two poles.
Appendix: Organisational Diagrams
The Divisions of Roskilde Festival, 2019
Stylised Diagram of the Organisational Hierarchy of Roskilde Festival, 2019
Organisational Diagram of the Commerce-Division
Organisational Diagram of the Communication-Division
Organisational Diagram of the Organisation & Culture-Division
Organisational Diagram of the Participants-Division
Organisational Diagram of the Programme-Division
Organisational Diagram of the Urban Planning & Production-Division
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hedegaard, J. Professional Volunteerism: Interwoven paradoxes in the management of Roskilde Festival. Voluntas 34, 497–518 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00521-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00521-3