Skip to main content

Unmasking the Barriers to Financing Social Enterprises

VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations volume 33, pages 550–560 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

The institutional complexity of social enterprises (SEs) often hinders their access to financing from conventional investors. To align the interests of SEs and their investors, innovative investment instruments of social finance are emerging. However, there is evidence of a mismatch between the financial needs of SEs and the instruments offered by social finance entities (SFEs). The analysis of 34 SEs and 6 SFEs through the lens of agency theory shows that some barriers are caused by contradictory agent—steward models of behaviour, whereas others are deficiencies of the SE sector in general. The study demonstrates that the SE financing gap is a complex problem that requires multifaceted solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • AESCAT (2020). Bases de la llei d’economia socal i solidaria. Economia social Catalunya, Retrieved from https://economiasocialcatalunya.cat/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/BasesLLeiESS_VDef__1.pdf

  • Arena, M., Bengo, I., Calderini, M., & Chiodo, V. (2018). Unlocking finance for social tech start-ups: Is there a new opportunity space? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 154–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing – Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. L., Bingham, C. B., & Hallen, B. L. (2019). The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4), 810–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. A., Haugh, H., & Chambers, L. (2019). Barriers to social enterprise growth. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(4), 1616–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Allen, M. R., & Hayes, H. D. (2010). Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(6), 1093–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. (2008). Philanthropy and enterprise: Harnessing the power of business and social entrepreneurship for development. Innovations Technology, Governance, Globalization, 3(3), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(6), 2469–2497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, G., & Scheuerle, T. (2016). Social impact investing in Germany: Current impediments from investors and social entrepreneurs perspectives. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(4), 1638–1668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehenberger, L., Mair, J., & Metz, A. (2019). The assembly of a field ideology: An idea-centric perspective on systemic power in impact investing. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1672–1704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingstad, E. L., Knockaert, M., & Fassin, Y. (2014). Smart money for social ventures: An analysis of the value-adding activities of philanthropic venture capitalists. Venture Capital, 16(4), 349–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. H., & Wagman, L. (2014). Portfolio size and information disclosure: An analysis of startup accelerators. Journal of Corporate Finance, 29, 520–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16(1), 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. A. (2019). From legitimacy to learning: How impact measurement perceptions and practices evolve in social enterprise–social finance organization relationships. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(3), 562–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S., Bowles, L., & Baird, R. (2013). Bridging the “pioneer gap”: The role of accelerators in launching high-impact enterprises. Innovations Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8(3–4), 105–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. A., Chen, L. W., & Roberts, P. W. (2020). Are we accelerating equity investment into impact-oriented ventures? World Development, 131, 104952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. A., & Park, J. (2020). How social ventures grow: Understanding the role of philanthropic grants in scaling social entrepreneurship. Business & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320973434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larralde, B., & Schwienbacher, A. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurial Finance. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leborgne-Bonassié, M., Coletti, M., & Sansone, G. (2019). What do venture philanthropy organisations seek in social enterprises? Business Strategy Development, 2(4), 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, O. M., & Nicholls, A. (2014). Social finance and crowdfunding for social enterprises: A public–private case study providing legitimacy and leverage. Venture Capital, 16(3), 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, F., & Owen, R. (2019). Financing social enterprises and the demand for social investment. Strategic Change, 28(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Hehenberger, L. (2014). Front-stage and backstage convening: The transition from opposition to mutualistic coexistence in organizational philanthropy. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1174–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti, I., and Mair, J. (2009). Bringing change into the lives of the poor: Entrepreneurship outside traditional boundaries. Institutional Work Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations, 92–119.

  • Mazzei, M., & Roy, M. J. (2017). From policy to practice: Exploring practitioners’ perspectives on social enterprise policy claims. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(6), 2449–2468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2010). The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 70–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormiston, J., Charlton, K., Donald, M. S., & Seymour, R. G. (2015). Overcoming the challenges of impact investing: Insights from leading investors. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(3), 352–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paschen, J. (2017). Choose wisely: Crowdfunding through the stages of the startup life cycle. Business Horizons, 60(2), 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, D. B., & Dean, S. A. (2017). Social Enterprise Law: Trust, Public Benefit, and Capital Markets. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, B., & Sorheim, R. (2000). The informal venture capital market in Norway? Investor characteristics, behaviour and investment preferences. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 2(2), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renko, M. (2013). Early challenges of nascent social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1045–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunley, P., & Pinch, S. (2012). Financing social enterprise: Social bricolage or evolutionary entrepreneurialism? Social Enterprise Journal, 8(2), 108–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding has been received to conduct the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

    Nina Magomedova

  2. Barcelona School of Management, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain

    Ramon Bastida-Vialcanet

Authors
  1. Nina Magomedova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ramon Bastida-Vialcanet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Magomedova.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magomedova, N., Bastida-Vialcanet, R. Unmasking the Barriers to Financing Social Enterprises. Voluntas 33, 550–560 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00498-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00498-z

Keywords

  • Social enterprise
  • Social finance
  • Agency theory
  • Impact investing
  • Social impact
  • Non-profit organizations