Abstract
In recent decades, significant changes have occurred to how charities and non-profit organizations are funded. However, only limited research has considered how the new financial landscape affects the work being carried out by these organizations. This article presents a quantitative analysis of the relationship between financing and the number of volunteers. The data material consists of panel data on revenue streams to nationwide, social, non-profit organizations in Denmark. The analysis reveals a strong, positive relationship between both value-driven general revenues and the organizations’ equity in relation to the number of volunteers. Conversely, targeted and means-driven investments do not have any significant correlation with the number of volunteers. Overall, the findings point to the fact that more volunteers can be attracted through forms of financing that strengthen the stability and organizational capacity of an organization as well as its ability to independently organize the work to be done.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Fixed prices have been used at the 2017 level.
References
Abraham, K. G., & Mackie, C. (2004). Beyond the market: Designing nonmarket accounts for the United States. Washington: National Academies Press.
Aiken, M., & Harris, M. (2017). The “hollowing out” of smaller third sector organisations? Voluntary Sector Review, 8(3), 333–342.
Alcock, P. (2016). The history of third sector service delivery in the UK. In J. Rees & D. Mullins (Eds.), The third sector delivering public services. Bristol: Bristol University, Press Policy Press.
Andersen, J., Hede, A., & Andersen, J. G. (2017). Tilliden til samfundets bærebjælker [Confidence in the pillars of society]. Copenhagen: Tryg Foundation.
Andersen, L. L. (2019). Hybride civilsamfundsorganisationer under forandring: Neoliberale praksisser, marked og civile rettigheder [Hybrid civil society organizations under change: Neoliberal practices, market and civil rights]. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 21(4), 67–75.
Baines, S., Hardill, I., & Wilson, R. (2011). Introduction: Remixing the economy of welfare? Social Policy and Society, 10(3), 337–339.
Beck, N. (2001). Time-series-cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 271.
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. The American Political Science Review, 100(4), 67–67.
Bernstein, S. (1991). Managing contracted services in the nonprofit agency. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Body, A. (2015). Weathering the storm: Understanding the voluntary sector through a fields theory analysis: Early findings of a case study of preventative children’s services in Kent. Working paper presented at Voluntary Sector and Volunteering Research Conference, NCVO, Leeds.
Boje, T. P. (2017). Civilsamfund, medborgerskab og deltagelse [Civil society, citizenship and participation] [Civil society, citizenship and participation]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels.
Chapman, T. (2017). Journeys and destinations: using longitudinal analysis to explore how third sector organisational governance helps to navigate sustainable futures. Voluntary sector review., 8(1), 3–24. ([Online]).
Chew, C., & Osborne, S. P. (2008). Strategic positioning in UK charities that provides services. Public Money & Management, 28(5), 283–290.
Clifford, D., Geyne-Rahme, F., & Mohan, J. (2013). Variations between organisations and localities in government funding of third-sector activity: Evidence from the national survey of third-sector organisations in England. Urban Studies, 50(5), 959–976.
Espersen, H. H., Andersen, L. L., Olsen, L., Tortzen, A. (2018). Understøttelse og udvikling af det frivillige sociale arbejde [Support and development of voluntary social work]. Copenhagen: VIVE – The Danish Center for Social Science Research.
Fridberg, t, & Henriksen, L. S. . (2014). Udvikling i frivilligt socialt arbejde [Development in voluntary social work]. Copenhagen: SFI.
Frumkin, P., & Kim, M. T. (2002). The effect of government funding on nonprofit administrative efficiency: An empirical test. Cambridge: Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Gronbjerg, K. A. (1991). Managing grants and contracts: The case of four nonprofit social service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(1), 5–24.
Henriksen, L. S., & Bundesen, P. (2004). The moving frontier in Denmark: Voluntary-state relationships since 1850. Journal of Social Policy, 33(4), 605–625.
Henriksen, L. S., Koch-Nielsen, I., & Rosdahl, D. (2008). Formal and informal volunteering in a Nordic context: The case of Denmark. Journal of Civil Society, 4(3), 193–209.
Ibsen, B. (1997). Fordærver pengene foreningerne? [Does money corrupt associations?]. Politica, 29(1), 49.
Ishkanian, A., & Szreter, S. (2012). The big society debate: A new agenda for social welfare? London: Edward Elgar.
Kendall, J., Mohan, J., Brookes, N., & Yoon, Y. (2018). The English voluntary sector: How volunteering and policy climate perceptions matter. Journal of Social Policy, 47(4), 759–782.
Kramer, R. M. (1994). Voluntary agencies and the contract culture. Social Service Review, 68(1), 33–60.
Lie, M., & Baines, S. (2007). Making sense of organizational change: Voices of older volunteers. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18(3), 225–240.
Lorentzen, H., & Henriksen, L. S. (2014). The invention and institutionalization of volunteer centers: A comparative analysis of Norway and Denmark. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(3), 589–608.
Milbourne, L. (2013). Voluntary sector in transition: Hard times or new opportunities? Bristol: Policy Press.
Milbourne, L., & Murray, U. (2017). Civil society organizations in turbulent times: A gilded web? London: Trebtham Books.
Milbourne, L., & Murray, U. (2017B). Dangerous liaisons and spaces for resistance. In civil society organizations in turbulent times: A gilded web? London: Trebtham Books.
Mulgan, G., et al. (2015). Social finance Does ‘investment’ add value? In Nicholls (Ed.), Social finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Murray, U. (2017). Voluntary organizations and criminal justice: A misguided turn. In L. Milbourne & U. Murray (Eds.), Civil society organizations in turbulent times: A gilded web? London: Trebtham Books.
Nicholls, A. (2010). The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 70–100.
Nicholls, A., et al. (2015). Social Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nicholls, A., & Emerson, J., et al. (2015). Social finance: Capitalizing social impact. In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social finance (pp. 1–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pharoah, C. (2012). Finding the big society. In A: Ishkanian & S. Szreter, see above.
Salamon, L. (2010). Putting the civil society sector on the economic map of the world. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(2), 167–210.
Salway, M. (2017). Social investment as a new charity finance tool: Using both head and heart. Centre for Charity Effectiveness, Cass Business School: University of London.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflexive practioner: How practitioner think in action. New York: Basic.
Sivesind, K. H. (ed.). (2016). Mot en ny skandinavisk velferdsmodell? [Toward a new Scandinavia welfare model?] Institut for samfundsforskning, rapport 2016 01.
Skalts, V., & Nørgaard, M. (1981). Mødrehjælpens epoke [The era of Mothers’ Aid]. Copenhagen: Forlaget Rhodos.
Smith, S. R. (2018). The future of nonprofit human services. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(4), 369–389.
United Nations. (2018). Handbook on non-profit institutions in the system of national account. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division.
Young, D., et al. (2015). Financing social innovation. In Nicholls (Ed.), Social finance (pp. 96–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Warburton, J., Moore, M., & Oppeinhemer, M. (2018). Challenges to the recruitment and retention of volunteers in traditional nonprofit organizations: A case study of Australian meals on wheels. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(16), 1361–1373.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Whitfield, D. (2014). The ideological context. NCIA Inquiry into the Future of Voluntary Services.
Wijkström, F. (2011). Charity speak and business talk: The on-going (re)hybridization of civil. The transformation of the popular movement tradition. Nomos: In Nordic civil society at a cross-roads.
Wijkström, F., & Zimmer, A. (2011). Introduction: Nordic civil societies beyond. The transformation of the popular movement tradition. Nomos: In Nordic civil society at a cross-roads.
Funding
This study was funded by Roskilde University and the Obelsk Family Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
See Table 3 .
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clausen, M.R. How Funding of Non-profit Social Organizations Affects the Number of Volunteers. Voluntas 33, 362–373 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00321-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00321-1