Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Online or Offline? Nonprofits’ Choice and Use of Social Media in Hong Kong

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonprofits are strategically using social media to disseminate information, engage with community, and mobilize activities. The use of social media has attracted increasing academic discussion in the recent years. By challenging the proposition that online presence is always beneficial to nonprofits, we argue that seeking an online presence is itself a strategic choice; social environment as well as resource dependence would fairly affect nonprofits’ decision either to join the cyber world or just stay offline. Based on analysis of 427 social service nonprofit organizations in Hong Kong, we find that nonprofits that depend on private funding are more likely to use social media, while those depend on government funding are less likely to appear online. We further examine the nonprofits’ activeness and effectiveness of social media using, and find that informational posts generate the most “likes,” while actional posts are more likely to be diffused through “shares.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anagnostopoulos, C., Gillooly, L., Cook, D., Parganas, P., & Chadwick, S. (2017). Stakeholder communication in 140 characters or less: A study of community sport foundations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,28(5), 2224–2250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortree, D. S., & Seltzer, T. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review,35(3), 317–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briones, R. L., Kuch, B., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2011). Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses the social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review,37(1), 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bürger, T. (2015). Use of digital advocacy by German nonprofit foundations on Facebook. Public Relations Review,41(4), 523–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. A., Lambright, K. T., & Wells, C. J. (2014). Looking for friends, fans, and followers? The social media use in public and nonprofit human services. Public Administration Review,74(5), 655–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, V. L., & Feroz, E. H. (2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organizations and Society,26(7–8), 565–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D., Aerts, W., Ledoux, M. J., & Magnan, M. (2010). Web-based disclosure about value creation processes: A monitoring perspective. A Journal of Accounting, Finance, and Business Studies,46(3), 320–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, L., Edwards, C., Fraser, K. L., Gudelsky, S., Holmquist, J., Thornton, K., et al. (2010). Adoption of the social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relations Review,36(1), 90–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimhjellen, I., Wollebæk, D., & Strømsnes, K. (2014). Associations online: Barriers for using web-based communication in voluntary associations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,25(3), 730–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrow, H., & Yuan, Y. C. (2011). Building stronger ties with alumni through Facebook to increase volunteerism and charitable giving. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,16(3), 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, P. (2006). Accountability and legitimacy in American foundation philanthropy. In K. Prewitt, M. Dogan, S. Heydemann, & S. Toepler (Eds.), The legitimacy of philanthropic foundations. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gálvez-Rodriguez, M. D. M., Caba-Perez, C., & López-Godoy, M. (2014). Facebook: A new communication strategy for non-profit organisations in Colombia. Public Relations Review,40(5), 868–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & MacAulay, M. (2009). NPO 2.0? Exploring the web presence of environmental nonprofit organizations in Canada. Global Media Journal,2(1), 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2014). Tweeting social change: How the social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,43(1), 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2018). Speaking and being heard: How nonprofit advocacy organizations gain attention on social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,47(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HKSAR Social Welfare Department. (2000). Welfare Sector Subvention Reforms. Retrieved June 4, 2019 from https://www.swd.gov.hk/doc/ngo/SectorReform_eng.pdf

  • HKSAR Social Welfare Department. (2016). Social Welfare Services Lump Sum Grant Manual. Retrieved June 4, 2019 from https://www.swd.gov.hk/en/index/site_ngo/page_subventions/sub_lsgmanual/

  • Kang, S., & Norton, H. E. (2004). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the World Wide Web: Are they sufficiently fulfilling organizational goals? Public Relations Review,30(3), 279–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenix, J. L. (2007). In search of Utopia: An analysis of non-profit web pages. Information, Community & Society,10(1), 69–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knott, J. H., & McCarthy, D. (2007). Policy venture capital: Foundations, government partnerships, and child care programs. Administration & Society,39(3), 319–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knott, J. H., & Weissert, C. S. (1995). Foundations and health policy: Identifying funding strategies in health programming. Review of Policy Research,14(1–2), 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. W. Y. (2012). The New Public Management reform of state-funded social service nonprofit organizations and the changing politics of welfare in Hong Kong. International Review of Administrative Sciences,78(3), 537–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenkowsky, L. (2003). Foundations and corporate philanthropy. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeRoux, K. (2009a). Paternalistic or participatory governance? Examining opportunities for client participation in nonprofit social service organizations. Public Administration Review,69(3), 504–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeRoux, K. (2009b). Managing stakeholder demands: Balancing responsiveness to clients and funding agents in nonprofit social service. Administration & Society,41(2), 158–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use the social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,17(3), 337–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, K., Waters, R. D., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review,38(2), 313–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. P., & Carboni, J. L. (2016). The social media management. Nonprofit Management and Leadership,27(2), 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Men, L. R., & Tsai, W. H. S. (2012). How companies cultivate relationships with publics on social network sites: Evidence from China and the United States. Public Relations Review,38(5), 723–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, L., Liu, H. K., & Cheng, W. (2016). Exploring factors that influence voluntary disclosure by Chinese foundations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,27(5), 2374–2400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. E. (2000). Agency theory in the not-for-profit sector: Its role at independent colleges. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,29(2), 280–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, K. (2006). Foundations. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 355–377). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinton, S., & Fennemore, P. (2013). Missing a strategic marketing trick? The use of online social networks by UK charities. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing,18(1), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, M. M. G., Caba Perez, M. C., & Lopez Godoy, M. (2012). Determining factors in online transparency of NGOs: A Spanish case study. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,23, 661–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffer, A. J., Sommerfeldt, E. J., & Taylor, M. (2013). The effects of organizational Twitter interactivity on organization–public relationships. Public Relations Review,39(3), 213–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G. D., Kuo, J. S., & Ho, Y. C. (2012). The determinants of voluntary financial disclosure by nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,41(6), 1051–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G. D., Niyirora, J. N., Guo, C., & Waters, R. D. (2015). # AdvocatingForChange: The strategic use of hashtags in the social media advocacy. Advances in Social Work,16(1), 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G. D., & Waters, R. D. (2014). What do stakeholders like on Facebook? Examining public reactions to nonprofit organizations’ informational, promotional, and community-building messages. Journal of Public Relations Research,26(3), 280–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smitko, K. (2012). Donor engagement through Twitter. Public Relations Review,38(4), 633–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, P. G., Mahoney, T. Q., & Hambrick, M. E. (2015). Twitter as a communication tool for nonprofits: A study of sport-for-development organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,44(6), 1086–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay-Boire, J., & Prakash, A. (2015). Accountability.org: Online disclosures by US nonprofits. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,26(2), 693–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen, S., Christiaens, J., & Milis, K. (2011). Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations’ compliance with reporting standards? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,40(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D. (2007). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the Internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the internet sites of the philanthropy 400. Nonprofit Management and Leadership,18(1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review,35(2), 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D., & Jamal, J. Y. (2011). Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ Twitter updates. Public Relations Review,37(3), 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, M. C., Cheung, J. C.-S., Tsui, M.-S., & Chu, C. K. (2017). Examining the neoliberal discourse of accountability: The case of Hong Kong’s social service sector. International Social Work,60(4), 976–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H., & Pan, Q. (2016). Information, community, and action on Sina-Weibo: How Chinese philanthropic NGOs use the social media. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,27(5), 2433–2457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Politics and Public Administration, Centre for Civil Society and Governance, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong

    Wai Fung Lam

  2. Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Civil Society and Governance, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong

    Lin Nie

Authors
  1. Wai Fung Lam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lin Nie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Nie.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lam, W.F., Nie, L. Online or Offline? Nonprofits’ Choice and Use of Social Media in Hong Kong. Voluntas 31, 111–128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00128-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00128-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation