Civic Action and Volunteering: The Changing Space for Popular Engagement in England

Abstract

The idea that volunteering and civic action may both play a role within the work of voluntary organizations has a long historical legitimacy in England. However, recent policy trends appear to undermine notions that the critical expression of official views is acceptable. In particular, where voluntary organizations are engaged in service-level contracts with statutory agencies, engagement in the political sphere is seen as risky. This paper takes an historical and analytic perspective to examine the evolution of volunteering and civic action in England. It examines how different discourses have affected spaces for popular engagement of voluntary organizations over time and the degree to which these are changing. The paper considers ways in which the complex and dynamic variations of this engagement can be understood in the contemporary voluntary sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Aiken, M., & Harris, M. (2017). The 'hollowing out of smaller Third Sector Organisations? Voluntary Sector Review, 8(3), 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alcock, P. (2010). Building the Big Society: A new policy environment for the third sector in England. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(3), 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alinsky, S. (1971). Rules for radicals. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Archer, M. (1998). Introduction: Realism in the social science. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, et al. (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. 189–205). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aves, G. (1969). The voluntary worker in the social services. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barings Independence Panel. (2015). An Independent Mission: The voluntary sector in 2015. The panel’s 4th annual assessment. London: Baring Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bartlett, W., Propper, C., Wilson, D., & Le Grand, J. (Eds.). (1994). Quasi-markets in the welfare state. Bristol: School for Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  8. BBC 1. (2014). 2015 election campaign officially begins on Friday. Reported 18 December 2014. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30477250. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.

  9. BBC Radio 4. (2014). Face the facts: Say more, do less. Broadcast. Accessed 27 July 2014.

  10. Beveridge, W. H. (1948). Voluntary action: A report on methods of social advance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brenton, M. (1985). The voluntary sector in British social services. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Briggs and McCartney. (1984). Toynbee hall: The first 100 years. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brodie, E., Hughes, T., Jochum, V., Miller, S., Ockenden, N., & Warburton, D. (2011). Pathways through participation, NCVO, London. http://pathwaysthroughparticipation.org.uk/resources/finalreport/. Accessed 5 May 2017.

  15. Burke, E. (1875/2009). Selected works Vol 2 reflections on the revolution in France. In E. J. Payne (Ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  16. Cabinet Office. (2016). Government announces new clause to be inserted into grant agreements. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-announces-new-clause-to-be-inserted-into-grant-agreements. Accessed 28 Aug 2018.

  17. Cairns, B. (2009). ‘The independence of the voluntary sector from Government in England. In M. Smerden (Ed.), The first principle of voluntary action. Working Paper 3 (pp. 35–50). London: Barings Foundation.

  18. Cairns, B., Hutchison, R., & Aiken, M. (2010). ‘It’s not what we do, it’s how we do it’: managing the tension between service delivery and advocacy. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(2), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cameron, D. (2011). Building the Big society. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/78979/building-big-society_0.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2017.

  20. Centeno, M. A., & Cohen, J. N. (2012). The arc of neoliberalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 317–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Charity Commission for England and Wales. (2014/2017). Guidance: Charities, elections and referendums. http://www.charitycommissionni.org.uk/charity-essentials/charities-and-politics/. Accessed 20 July 2017.

  22. Charity Commission for Northern Ireland. (2014). Charities and politics. http://www.charitycommissionni.org.uk/charity-essentials/charities-and-politics/. Accessed 3 May 2017.

  23. City of Sanctuary. (2016). City of Sanctuary. https://cityofsanctuary.org. Accessed 27 Apr 2017.

  24. Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil Society and political thought. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cook, S. (2015). Criticism of charities not a coherent campaign, but an expression of frustration, says Andrew Purkis’, Third Sector, 03/9/2015. http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/criticism-charities-not-coherent-campaign-expression-frustration-says-andrew-purkis/policy-and-politics/article/1362686. Accessed 22 Apr 2017.

  26. Craig, G., Taylor, M., & Parkes, T. (2004). Protest or partnership? The voluntary and community sectors in the policy process. Social Policy & Administration, 38(3), 221–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Crees, J., Davies, N., Jochum, V., & Kane, D. (2016). Navigating change: An analysis of financial trends for small and medium-sized charities. London: NCVO.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neo-liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. DCLG. (2008). Communities in control: Real people, real power. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deakin, N. (2010). Religion, state and third sector in England. Journal of Political Ideologies, 15(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2010.513874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Doctors of the World. (2017). Volunteer roles. https://www.doctorsoftheworld.org.uk/jobs-and-volunteer-roles/jobs-volunteer-faqs/. Accessed 21 July 2018.

  32. Driver, S., & Martell, J. (1997). New labour’s communitarianisms. Critical Social Policy, 17(3), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Durose, C., & Richardson, L. (2015). Designing Public policy for co-production: Theory, practice and change. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Etzioni, A. (1993). The spirit of community. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Evers, A. (2009). Civicness, civility and their meanings for social services. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20(3), 239–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Evers, A., & von Essen, J. (2017). Volunteering and civil action. Voluntas (this volume forthcoming).

  37. Evers, A. and Essens, J. (2019) The complex variations of civic action and volunteering (this issue)

  38. Freeden, M. (2003). Ideology. A very short introduction. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Graebner, D. (2014). Debt: The first 5000 years. London: Melville House Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hansard. (1978). Voluntary organisations: Wolfenden Report’. Speech by Baroness Young (Vol 388 cc101–96). http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/lords/1978/jan/18/voluntary-organisations-wolfenden-report. Accessed 2 May 2017.

  42. Hill, S. (2013). Digital revolutions: Activism in the internet age. Oxford: New Internationalist Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hirst, P. (1994). Associative democracy: New forms of economic and social governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hummingbird Project. (2017). About hummingbird. http://www.hummingbirdproject.org.uk. Accessed 24 Apr 2017.

  45. ICA. (2014). Co-operative identity, values and principles. http://ica.coop/en/whats-co-op/co-operative-identity-values-principles. Accessed 24 Apr 2017.

  46. Kendal, J. (2010). Bringing ideology back in: the erosion of political innocence in English third sector policy. Journal of Political Ideologies, 15(3), 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kenny, S., Taylor, M., Onyx, J., & Mayo, M. (2015). Challenging the third sector: global prospects for active citizenship. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Knight, B. (1993). Voluntary action. London: Centris.

    Google Scholar 

  49. KVV. (2014). Keep volunteering voluntary agreement. http://keepvolunteeringvoluntary.net/signup. Accessed 20 Sept 2014.

  50. KVV. (2016). Keep volunteering voluntary. http://www.keepvolunteeringvoluntary.net/about. Accessed 2 May 2017.

  51. Localism White Paper. (2010). Decentralisation and the localism bill: An essential guide. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  52. May, T. (2017). Prime Minister’s speech at the Charity Commission Annual Meeting. https://www.gov.uk/speeches/the-shared-society-prime-ministers-speech-at-the-charity-commission-annual-meeting. Accessed 4 Feb 2017.

  53. McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S., & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2002). New public management: Current trends and future prospects. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Milbourne, L., & Cushman, M. (2015). Complying, transforming or resisting in the new austerity: Realigning social welfare and independent action amongst English voluntary organisations. Journal of Social Policy, 44(3), 463–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mold, A. (2009). Charity: What can we learn from history? http://www.historyextra.com/feature/charity-what-can-we-learn-history. Accessed 6 May 2017.

  56. Morison, J. (2000). The government–voluntary sector compacts: Governance, governmentality and civil society. Journal of Law and Society, 27(1), 98–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. NCIA. (2011). Let’s talk about… people, places, money and photocopiers. London: National Coalition for Independent Action. http://www.independentaction.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/NCIA_resourcing_conversation.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2018.

  58. NCIA. (2015). ‘Fight or fright. Voluntary services in 2015. http://www.independentaction.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/NCIA-Inquiry-summary-report-final.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2017.

  59. Newman, J., & Clarke, J. (2009). Publics, politics and power: Remaking the public in public services. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  60. O’Hara, M. (2015). Austerity bites: A journey to the sharp end of cuts in the UK. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Oppenheimer, M., & Deakin, N. (Eds.). (2000). Beveridge and voluntary action in Britain and the Wider British World. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Oxford English Dictionary (2017) ‘Solidarity’. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/solidarity. Accessed 20 Jan 2019.

  64. Peace of Cake. (2017). Peace of cake shared with friends. https://peaceofcaketogetherblog.wordpress.com. Accessed 20 Feb 2017.

  65. People’s Republic of Southwark. (2016). http://peoplesrepublicofsouthwark.co.uk/index.php/hold-about-us/about-us/3793-people-s-republic-of-southwark-december-2015-newsletter. Accessed 16 Dec 2016.

  66. Pudelek, J. (2014). Brooks Newmark: Charities should keep out of politics. Civil Society Magazine, 3/9/2014. http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/18092/brooks_newmark_charities_should_stick_to_their_knitting_and_keep_out_of_politics. Accessed 10 Sept 2014.

  67. Pugh, G. (2007). London’s forgotten children: Thomas Coram and the Foundling hospital. Stroud: Tempus.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Quiligan, J. (2013). P2P foundation: James Quilligan. http://p2pfoundation.net/James_Quilligan. Accessed 20 Oct 2014.

  70. Rochester, C. (2013). Rediscovering voluntary action: The beat of a different drum. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Rochester, C. (2014). The impact of commissioning and contracting on volunteers and volunteering in Voluntary Services Groups. NCIA Inquiry Working Paper 8, NCIA, London.

  72. Scott, D., & Russell, L. (2001) Contracting: the Experience of Service Delivery Agencies. In M. Harris, & S. Rochester (Eds.), Voluntary organisations and social policy in Britain: Perspectives on change and choice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Schwarz, W. (1989). The new dissenters: the nonconformist conscience in the age of thatcher. London: Bedford Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Siddique, H. (2016). Trust in charities at record low after scandals. Populus Research. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/jun/28/trust-in-charities-at-record-low-after-scandals. Accessed 4 May 2017.

  75. Smith, G. (2012). Associative democracy and the social economy: Exploring the regulatory challenge. Economy and Society, 41(2), 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Snowdon, C. (2012). Sock Puppets: How the government lobbies itself and why, Institute of Economic Affairs, 11/6/2012. https://iea.org.uk/publications/research/sock-puppets-how-the-government-lobbies-itself-and-why. Accessed 28 Apr 2017.

  77. Snowdon, C. (2015). Sock Puppets: A step in the right direction, Institute of Economic Affairs Institute of Economic Affairs, 24/2/2015. https://iea.org.uk/blog/sock-puppets-a-step-in-the-right-direction. Accessed 20 Apr 2017.

  78. Stedman Jones, G. (1971). Outcast London: A study in the relationship between classes in Victorian society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Taylor, M. (2017). Greenpeace fined under Lobbying Act in ‘act of civil disobedience’ (18/4/2017) Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/18/greenpeace-first-organisation-fined-lobbying-act?page=with:img-2. Accessed 8 May 2017.

  80. Taylor, M., & Kendall, J. (1996). History of the voluntary sector. In J. Kendall & M. Knapp (Eds.), The voluntary sector in the UK’. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Teasdale, S. (2012). What’s in a name? Making sense of social enterprise discourses. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Thompson, E. P. (1963/2013). The making of the English working class. London: Penguin.

  83. Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacic, R., & Mitchell, J. (1991). Markets, hierarchies and networks: The co-ordination of social life. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Titmus, R. (1970). The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Trust, Blueprint. (2018). How can investors identify purpose-led companies?. London: Blueprint Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Unwin, J. (2017). Julia Unwin launches Civil Society Futures. https://civilsocietyfutures.org/speech-julia-unwin-launches-civil-society-futures/. Accessed 6 May 2017.

  87. Webb, B., & Webb, S. (1916). The prevention of destitution. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Young, D. R., & Casey, J. (2016). Supplementary, complementary, or adversarial? Nonprofit-government relations. In E. Boris & E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and conflict (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Aiken.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aiken, M., Taylor, M. Civic Action and Volunteering: The Changing Space for Popular Engagement in England. Voluntas 30, 15–28 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00090-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Volunteers
  • Civic action
  • Political sphere
  • Discourses