Organizing for Education: A Cross-National, Longitudinal Study of Civil Society Organizations and Education Outcomes
- 332 Downloads
We address two views from organization theory to consider the expansion and effects of nonprofits in education: first, a functional view emphasizing the direct effect of work of civil society organizations (CSOs) and, second, a phenomenological neoinstitutional view focusing on the cultural meaning of education CSOs as indicators of a rationalized, liberal world society. We use panel regression models with country fixed effects to analyze the cross-national expansion of domestic education CSO sectors in 130 countries from 1970 to 2014. We then examine the association between the size of the domestic education CSO sector and memberships in international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) with education outcomes, including spending, education aid, secondary and tertiary enrollments, and the share of women in secondary and tertiary education. Results show that INGO memberships, an expanded state, and an expanded education system are highly associated with the expansion of a domestic education CSO sector. Both domestic CSOs and INGO memberships tend to have a significant, positive relationship with education outcomes net of other factors. We also find preliminary evidence indicating that the causal forces at play are more complex than a straightforward direct effect of education CSOs doing good work. Specifically, CSOs, at least in part, are indicators of a Western, liberal model of a proper modern society; the underpinning culture, represented by CSOs, accounts for some educational expansion above and beyond the benefit (or harm) caused by any given entity.
KeywordsEducation Institutional theory Nonprofits Civil society organizations
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Anheier, H. K., & Salamon, L. M. (2006). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 89–114). New Heaven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Baker, D. (2014). The schooled society: The educational transformation of global culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (1999). Constructing world culture: International nongovernmental organizations since 1875. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Brody, E. (2002). Accountability and public trust. In L. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and the Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
- Christensen, J. (2004). Asking the do-gooders to prove they do good. The New York Times, January 3, 2004.Google Scholar
- Edelman Trust. (2007). Edelman trust barometer 2007. https://cms.edelman.com/sites/default/files/2017-03/2007-Edelman-Trust-Barometer-Executive-Summary.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.
- Fremont-Smith, M., & Kosaras, A. (2003). Wrongdoing by officers and directors of charities: A survey of press reports, 1995–2002. Working paper number 20. Cambridge: Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Gale, (2010). Encyclopedia of Associations: International Organizations (49th ed.). Florence: Gale Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Gale Group Website. (2017). Encyclopedia of Associations: International Organizations. Accessed on 15 November, 2017: http://find.galegroup.com/gdl/help/GDLeDirEA_IOHelp.html.
- Gellner, E. (1996). Conditions of liberty: civil society and its rivals. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Hannum, E., & Buchmann, C. (2003). The consequences of global educational expansion: social science perspectives. Cambridge: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
- Holloway, R. (1997). NGOs losing the moral high ground: corruption and misrepresentation. Discourse, 1(2), 9–12.Google Scholar
- Ilcan, S., & Lacey, A. (2011). Governing the poor: Exercises of poverty reduction, practices of global aid. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
- Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Inkeles, A., & Smith, D. H. (1970). Personal adjustment and modernization. In C. A. Devos (Ed.), Responses to change (pp. 103–130). New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
- Joyce, M., & Schambra, W. (1996). A new civic life. In M. Novak (Ed.), Empower people: from state to civil society (2nd ed., pp. 15–25). Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
- Lee, E. (2014). Does foreign aid make NGOs corrupt? The Guardian. Accessed on 16 November, 2017: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2014/may/01/aid-local-ngos-dishonest-development.
- Lentfer, J. (2014). Briefcase NGOs: How widespread is this, really? Accessed on 16 November, 2017 at: http://www.how-matters.org/2014/08/14/briefcase-ngos-how-widespread-really/.
- Light, P. C. (2004). Sustaining nonprofit performance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Marshall, M., Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. R. (2013). Polity IV project: Regime transitions and characteristics, 1800–2007. Detroit, MI: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
- Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Soysal, Y. N. (1992). World expansion of mass education, 1870–1980. Sociology of education, 128–149.Google Scholar
- Naidoo, K. (2004). The end of blind faith? Civil society and the challenges of accountability, transparency and legitimacy. AccountAbility Forum, Issue, 2, 14–15.Google Scholar
- Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2012). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Salamon, L. M. (1993). The global associational revolution: The rise of the third sector on the world scene. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
- Salamon, L. M. (2002). The resilient sector: The state of nonprofit America. In L. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K., List, R., Toepler, S., & Sokolowski, S. W. (1999). Global civil society. Dimensions of the nonprofit sector. Baltimore. Data Table 4 available on 24, November, 2016 at: http://ccss.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2013/02/Comparative-data-Tables_2004_FORMATTED_2.2013.pdf.
- Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M. P. (Eds.). (2004). Civic engagement in American democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Organizations and social structure. In J. March (Ed.) Handbook of organizations, pp. 142–193.Google Scholar
- Tompkins-Stange, M. (2016). Policy patrons: Philanthropy, education reform, and the politics of influence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Union of International Associations. (2016). Yearbook of International Organizations. Munich: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
- Union of International Associations. (2017). Yearbook of International Organizations. Online version accessed 17 May, 2017: http://ybio.brillonline.com/system/files/pdf/v5/2016/2_9.pdf.
- Union of International Associations Website. (2017). Frequently asked questions: What is an NGO?. Accessed on 15 November, 2017 at: https://uia.org/faq.
- Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, & Brady, Henry E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Weisbrod, B. (1978). The voluntary nonprofit sector. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- World Bank (2014). World development indicators 2014. World development indicators; Washington, DC.© World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/18237. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.