A new form of civic activism is taking root in many countries, which diverge from traditional civic actors with their structural and membership patterns. This article focuses on the relationship between the new and the traditional civic actors in Turkey, investigates the alliances established between them and discusses how these alliances contribute to civic activism. The discussions in this article are informed by existing conceptual debate in the literature on alliances. This article contributes to this literature by showing how the respective strengths of the new and the traditional activists complement each other. New civic activists’ closer ties to grassroots and their flexible organizational structure allow for quick reaction, more visibility and legitimacy. Traditional civic actors complement this with their stable structure that enables them to sustain their campaigns, engage in and follow up the legal struggles and act as a transmission belt to relations with public institutions and governance.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
See http://www.mimarist.org/emek-sinemasi-davasiyla-ilgili-belgeler/ for legal documents on Emek Theater (in Turkish).
Abbas, T., & Yiğit, İ. H. (2015). Scenes from Gezi Park: Localisation, nationalism and globalisation in Turkey. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 19(1), 61–76.
Almeida, P. D. (2005). Multi-sectoral coalitions and popular movement participation. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 26, 65–99.
Aslan, R. (2016). Dokuz soruda Cerattepe: Ne oldu, ne olacak? [Cerattepe in nine questions: What happened, what will happen?]. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2016/02/160223_dokuz_soruda_cerattepe. Accessed 17 July 2018.
Bakırköy Daily. (2017). CHP ve HDP Milletvekillerinin katılıyla Bakırköy Ruh ve Sinir Hastalıkları Hastanesi için eylem [Protests for Bakırköy Psychiatric Hospital with the participation of Members of Parliament from CHP and HDP]. Retrieved from http://www.bakirkoygazetesi.com/chp-ve-hdp-milletvekillerinin-katiliyla-bakirkoy-ruh-ve-sinir-hastaliklari-hastanesi-icin-eylem/3121. Accessed 17 July 2018.
Beaumont, P. (2013). Global protest grows as citizens lose faith in politics and the state. The Observer. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/22/urban-protest-changing-global-social-network. Accessed 17 July 2018.
Bee, B., & Kaya, A. (2017a). Determinants of young people’s civic and political participation in Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 17(1), 35–39.
Bee, C., & Kaya, A. (2017b). Youth and active citizenship in Turkey: Engagement, participation and emancipation. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 17(1), 129–143.
Bee, C., & Stavroula, C. (2017). Youth activists and occupy Gezi: Patterns of social change in public policy and in civic and political activism in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 18(1), 157–181.
Berclaz, J., & Giugni, M. (2005). Specifying the concept of political opportunity structures. In M. Kousis & C. Tilly (Eds.), Economic and political contention in comparative perspective. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Birgün. (2015). Kolin’in Yırca’daki santral projesine geç gelen ÇED iptali [Belated dismissal to the environmental assessment decision of Kolin’s power plant project in Yirca]. Retrieved from http://www.birgun.net/haber-detay/kolin-in-yirca-daki-santral-projesine-gec-gelen-ced-iptali-83767.html. Accessed 17 July 2018.
Budak, C., & Watts, D. J. (2015). Dissecting the spirit of Gezi: Influence vs. selection in the Occupy Gezi movement. Sociological Science, 2, 370–397.
Chang, P. Y. (2008). Unintended consequences of repression: alliance formation in South Korea’s democracy movement (1970–1979). Social Forces, 87(2), 651–677.
Clemens, E. S. (2013). Commentary: The many paths from protest to politics. Journal of Civil Society, 9(1), 111–115.
Daloğlu, T. (2014). Destruction of olive trees in Turkey triggers protests. Al-Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/11/turkey-olive-trees-chopped-power-plant.html#ixzz4hFmTsizI. Accessed 15 April 2018.
Della Porta, D., & Rucht, D. (1995). Left libertarian movements in context: A comparison of Italy and West Germany, 1965–1990. In J. C. Jenkins & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The Politics of social protest. Comparative perspectives on states and social movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Derman, Ö. (2017). Stand-in as a performative repertoire of action. Turkish Studies, 18(1), 182–208.
Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25.
Dong, Q., Guo, J., & Huang, C.-C. (2018). Nonprofit alliance in China: Effects of alliance process on goal achievement. Voluntas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9990-1.
Eisinger, P. (1973). The conditions of protest behavior in American cities. American Political Science Review, 67, 11–28.
Emek is Ours Initiative. (2016). Press release. Retrieved from http://emeksinemasi.blogspot.com/. Accessed 17 July 2018.
Farro, A. L., & Demirhisar, D. G. (2014). The Gezi Park movement: A Turkish experience of the twenty-first-century collective movements. International Review of Sociology, 24(1), 176–189.
Gamson, W. (1975). The strategy of social protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
Gamson, W., & Meyer, D. (1996). Framing political opportunity. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (1992). Mesomobilization: Organizing and framing two protest campaigns in West Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 98(3), 55–96.
Giugni, M. (2009). Political opportunities: From Tilly to Tilly. Swiss Political Science Review, 15(2), 361–368.
Glasius, M., & Ishkanian, A. (2015). Surreptitious symbiosis: Engagement between activists and NGOs. Voluntas, 26, 2620–2644.
Gümüş, P. (2017). Negotiating ‘the political’: A closer look at the components of young people’s politics emerging from the Gezi protests. Turkish Studies, 18(1), 77–101.
Keyman, F. E., & İçduygu, A. (2003). Globalization, civil society and citizenship in Turkey: Actors, boundaries and discourses. Citizenship Studies, 7, 219–234.
Kitschelt, H. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 57–85.
Klandermans, B. (1989). Introduction: Social movement organizations and the study of social movements. In B. Klandermans (Ed.), Organizing for change: Social movement organizations in Europe and United States. Greenwich, Conn: JAI.
Klandermans, B. (1990). Linking the old and new: Movement networks in the Netherlands. In R. J. Dalton & M. Kuechler (Eds.), Challenging the political order: New social movements in Western democracies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Klandermans, B. (1993). A theoretical framework for comparisons of social movement participation. Sociological Forum, 8(3), 383–402.
Krastev, I. (2014). Democracy disrupted. The politics of global protest. Philadelphia: Penn Press.
Kriesi, H. (1989). The Political opportunity structure of the Dutch peace movement. West European Politics, 12, 295–312.
Kuyumlu, M. B. (2013). Reclaiming the right to the city: Reflections on the urban uprisings in Turkey. City, 17(3), 274–278.
Leverink, J. (2016). Anti-mining protests in Turkey book temporary victory global issues. Retrieved from http://www.globalissues.org/news/2016/03/04/21895. Accessed 31 May 2017.
Marchetti, R., & Kaya, A. (2014). Europeanization, framing competition and civil society in the EU and Turkey. Working paper no. 6. IAI Istituto Affari Internazionali. Retrieved from http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/GTE_WP_06.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2018.
Mason, P. (2013). Why it’s still kicking off everywhere: The new global revolutions. London: Verso.
McCammon, H. J., & Campbell, K. E. (2002). Allies on the road to victory: Coalition formation between suffragists and the women’s Christian Temperance Union. Mobilization, 7(3), 231–251.
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.
Meyer, D. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 125–145.
Meyer, D. S., & Corrigall-Brown, C. (2005). Coalitions and political context: U.S. movements against wars in Iraq. Mobilization, 10(3), 327–344.
Moshtari, M., & Gonçalves, P. (2017). Factors influencing interorganizational collaboration within a disaster relief context. Voluntas, 28(4), 1673–1694.
Obserschall, A. (1973). Social conflict and social movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Oda TV. (2014). Bu kent Emek ister [This city is demanding/needs Emek]. Retrieved from http://odatv.com/bu-kent-emek-ister-0504141200.html. Accessed 17 July 2018.
Önal, L. (2016). Gezi Park and EuroMaidan: Social movements at the borders. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(1), 16–40.
Özçetin, B., & Özer, M. (2015). The current policy environment for civil society in Turkey. The Johns Hopkins comparative nonprofit sector project working paper no. 53.
Özkırımlı, U. (2014). The making of a protest movement in Turkey: #occupygezi. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Özyurt, O. (2013). 10 soruda Emek Sineması [Emek Theater in 10 questions]. Retrieved from http://www.sabah.com.tr/cumartesi/2013/04/13/10-soruda-emek-sinemasi.
Roca, B. (2007). Organizations in movement: An ethnographer in the Spanish campaign Poverty Zero. Voluntas, 18(2), 116–134.
Rucht, D. (2004). Movement allies, adversaries and third parties. In D. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Saxonberg, S. (2013). The influence of “conservative” women’s and family organizations in Hungary and the Czech Republic. In K. Jacobsson & S. Saxonberg (Eds.), Beyond NGO-ization the development of social movements in Central and Eastern Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.
Shaffer, M. B. (2000). Coalition work among environmental groups: Who participates? Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 22, 111–126.
Şimşek, S. (2004). New social movements in Turkey since 1980. Turkish Studies, 5(2), 111–139.
Sözcü. (2015). Emek Sineması davasında Demircan’a soruşturma! [Demircan under investigation in Emek Theater case!]. Retrieved from http://www.sozcu.com.tr/2015/gundem/emek-sinemasi-davasinda-demircana-sorusturma-708712/. Accessed 17 July 2018.
Tarcan, P. (2017). Petition submitted to Parliament for 17,000 trees in Bakırköy Psychiatric Hospital. Retrieved from https://bianet.org/english/human-rights/191022-petition-submitted-to-parliament-for-17-000-trees-in-bakirkoy-psychiatric-hospital. Accessed 17 July 2018.
The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2013). Rebels without a cause. What the upsurge in protest movements means for global politics. Retrieved from http://archive.battleofideas.org.uk/documents/RebelsWeb.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2018.
Tarrow, S. (1983). Straggling to reform: Social movements and policy change during cycles of protest. Western societies program occasional paper no. 15, Cornell University.
Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements 1768–2004. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Van Dyke, N. (2003). Crossing movement boundaries: Factors that facilitate coalition protest by American college stduents, 1930–1990. Social Problem, 50(2), 226–250.
Witesman, E., & Heiss, A. (2017). Nonprofit collaboration and the resurrection of market failure: How a resource-sharing environment can suppress social objectives. Voluntas, 28(4), 1500–1528.
YADA Foundation. (2014). Sivil toplum kuruluşlarına yönelik algı ve yaklaşımlar. İstanbul: Taze Baskı Merkezi.
YADA Foundation. (2015). Verilerle sivil toplum kuruluşları. Ankara: Odak Ofset Matbaacılık.
Yörük, E., & Yüksel, M. (2014). Class and politics in Turkey’s Gezi protests. New Left Review, 89(1), 103–123.
Youngs, R. (2017). Introduction. In R. Youngs (Ed.), Global civic activism in flux. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Zihnioğlu, Ö. (2017). Turkey: The struggles of a new civil society. In R. Youngs (Ed.), Global civic activism in flux. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
About this article
Cite this article
Zihnioğlu, Ö. The Prospects of Civic Alliance: New Civic Activists Acting Together with Civil Society Organizations. Voluntas 30, 289–299 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-0032-9
- Civic activism
- Civil society organizations
- Gezi protests