Skip to main content

Charity, Volunteering Type and Subjective Wellbeing

VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations volume 30, pages 1118–1132 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

We examine the impact of volunteering and charitable donations on subjective wellbeing. We further consider if the model of the volunteering work (formal vs. informal) and the geographical location of the charity organisation (local vs. international) people donate to has any impact on subjective wellbeing. Using UK’s Community Life Survey data, we find that volunteering and engagement in charity are positively associated with subjective wellbeing, measured by individual life satisfaction. We show that while there is a positive effect of volunteering and charity on life satisfaction, the level of utility gained depends on the type of charity or volunteering organisation engaged with (i.e. local or international). Specifically, donating to local (neighbourhood) charities as opposed to international/national charities is associated with higher wellbeing. Similarly, engaging in informal volunteering, compared to formal volunteering, is associated with higher wellbeing. To explain our results, we use the construal-level theory of psychological distance, which suggests that people think more concretely of actions and objects that they find spatially and socially close.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. In this study, our main measure of subjective wellbeing is self-reported life satisfaction although we also use happiness a proxy for wellbeing in robustness checks.

  2. Formal volunteering involves unpaid help in officially designated volunteer positions that is given through groups, organizations or clubs to benefit other people. On the other hand, informal help or volunteering is giving unpaid help as an individual.

  3. Unpaid help represents casual help that is provided by the respondent to others but not in the context of formal or informal volunteering.

  4. Local charity refers to charities located within a respondent’s immediate neighbourhood or community in the UK.

  5. Local charities here refer to charities within a respondent’s immediate locality or neighbourhood.

References

  • Andreoni, J. (1988). Privately provided public goods in a large economy: The limits of altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 35(1), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awaworyi Churchill, S., & Mishra, V. (2017). Trust, social networks and subjective wellbeing in China. Social Indicators Research, 132(1), 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1220-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awaworyi Churchill, S., Ocloo, J. E., & Siawor-Robertson, D. (2016). Ethnic diversity and health outcomes. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1454-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awaworyi Churchill, S., & Smyth, R. (2017). Ethnic diversity and poverty. World Development, 95, 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belfield, C. R., & Kelly, I. R. (2012). The benefits of breast feeding across the early years of childhood. Journal of Human Capital, 6(3), 251–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornemann, T., & Homburg, C. (2011). Psychological distance and the dual role of price. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 490–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buch, C. M., Kesternich, I., Lipponer, A., & Schnitzer, M. (2014). Financial constraints and foreign direct investment: Firm-level evidence. Review of World Economics, 150(2), 393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office. (2013). Community Life Survey, 2012–2013. UK Data Service. SN: 7405, https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7405-1.

  • Cabinet Office. (2014). Community Life Survey, 2013–2014. UK Data Service. SN: 7560, https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7560-1.

  • Cabinet Office. (2015). Community Life Survey, 2014–2015. UK Data Service. SN: 7836, https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7836-1.

  • Chen, H. S., Mitchell, R. K., Brigham, K. H., Howell, R., & Steinbauer, R. (2018). Perceived psychological distance, construal processes, and abstractness of entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(3), 296–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Z., & Smyth, R. (2015). Sex and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 112, 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, N. G., & Kim, J. (2011). The effect of time volunteering and charitable donations in later life on psychological wellbeing. Ageing and Society, 31(04), 590–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, R., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In E. D. E. M. Suh (Ed.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 185–218). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2017). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. UK: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drollinger, T. (2018). Using active empathetic listening to build relationships with major-gift donors. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 30(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27(1), 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emran, M. S., & Shilpi, F. (2012). The extent of the market and stages of agricultural specialization. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 45(3), 1125–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. A., & Brannick, M. T. (2007). Applying theories of institutional helping to informal volunteering: Motives, role identity, and prosocial personality. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(1), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, A., & Konrad, K. A. (1996). A signaling explanation for charity. The American Economic Review, 86(4), 1019–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, F., Cnaan, R. A., Brudney, J. L., Ascoli, U., Meijs, L. C., & Ranade, S. (2000). Public perception of “who is a volunteer”: An examination of the net-cost approach from a cross-cultural perspective. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 11(1), 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & John, D. R. (2008). Consumer response to brand extensions: Construal level as a moderator of the importance of perceived fit. Journal of consumer psychology, 18(2), 116–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, T. (2017). How does happiness relate to economic behaviour? A review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 68, 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledgerwood, A., Trope, Y., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 32–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. J., & Brudney, J. L. (2012). Participation in formal and informal volunteering: Implications for volunteer recruitment. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23(2), 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewbel, A. (2012). Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 30(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2012.643126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., & Förster, J. (2009). Distancing from experienced self: How global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMunn, A., Nazroo, J., Wahrendorf, M., Breeze, E., & Zaninotto, P. (2009). Participation in socially-productive activities, reciprocity and wellbeing in later life: Baseline results in England. Ageing and Society, 29(05), 765–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, V., & Smyth, R. (2015). Estimating returns to schooling in urban China using conventional and heteroskedasticity-based instruments. Economic Modelling, 47, 166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, H. (2014). Influences of resources and subjective dispositions on formal and informal volunteering. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(4), 1022–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro, H. (1998). Ambivalent messages: Organizational purposes of NGOs and images of the South. Development in Practice, 8(1), 74–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J., Rozario, P. A., & Tang, F. (2003). Effects of volunteering on the well-being of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(3), S137–S145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15(2), 187–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plagnol, A. C., & Huppert, F. A. (2010). Happy to help? Exploring the factors associated with variations in rates of volunteering across Europe. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, J. A., Isely, E. S., & Asamoa-Tutu, F. (2009). Developing a marketing strategy for nonprofit organizations: An exploratory study. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 21(2), 184–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela, M., Neira, I., & Salinas-Jiménez, M. (2013). Social capital and subjective wellbeing in Europe: A new approach on social capital. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0158-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1996). Altruism, nonprofits, and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 701–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. A. (1996). Volunteering: A serious leisure perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(2), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundeen, R. A., Raskoff, S. A., & Garcia, M. C. (2007). Differences in perceived barriers to volunteering to formal organizations: Lack of time versus lack of interest. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tienen, M., Scheepers, P., Reitsma, J., & Schilderman, H. (2011). The role of religiosity for formal and informal volunteering in the Netherlands. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(3), 365–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Mook, L., & Handy, F. (2017). An empirical examination of formal and informal volunteering in Canada. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(1), 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT University, 445 Swanston Street, Melbourne, Australia

    Samuelson Appau & Sefa Awaworyi Churchill

Authors
  1. Samuelson Appau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sefa Awaworyi Churchill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sefa Awaworyi Churchill.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5 and 6.

Table 5 Description and summary statistics of variables
Full size table
Table 6 Summary statistics of volunteering/charity by wellbeing levels
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Appau, S., Awaworyi Churchill, S. Charity, Volunteering Type and Subjective Wellbeing. Voluntas 30, 1118–1132 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-0009-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-0009-8

Keywords

  • Charity
  • Volunteer
  • Wellbeing
  • Life satisfaction
  • Psychological distance

JEL Classification

  • I31