Furthering Pluralism? The German Foundations in Transitional Tunisia

Abstract

This article examines the widely held assumption that Germany’s political foundations pursue distinctively partisan approaches that promise to be advantageous with regard to the furtherance of pluralist civil societies abroad. It reviews this assumption through a qualitative analysis of their partnerships in transitional Tunisia, following a comparison between the German foundations and other Western agencies. It exposes a common secular bias in Western civil society support and qualifies the assumption that the partisan approaches lead easily to pluralist civil society support. While the foundations partner with rather diverse organizations, they still favor organizations that follow Western lines, and their civil society support practices display interest in the furtherance of both pluralism and democratic stability promising corporatism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aberrahim, T. (2015). American Democracy Promotion in Transitioning Tunisia. A Reciepient Centered-Approach. Retrieved from http://tunisia-in-transition.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Working-Paper-Abderrahim-2015.pdf.

  2. Adam, E. (2012). Vom mühsamen Geschäft der Demokratieförderung. Die internationale Entwicklungszusammenarbeit der Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung. In E. Adam (Ed.), Vom mühsamen Geschäft der Demokratieförderung. Die internationale Entwicklungszusammenarbeit der Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung (pp. 17–62). Berlin: Dietz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adouani, S. & Sedrine, S. B. (2018). Trade Unions in Transformation. Trade Union Power and Democratic Transition in Tunisia. The UGTT: A Unique Story, An Unprecedented Experience. Retrieved from: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/14064.pdf.

  4. AlDailami, S. (2017). Interview mit Nordafrika-Experte Dr. Said AlDailami: Tunesien - Demokratie ohne Ertrag? 26.09.2017. Retrieved from https://www.hss.de/news/detail/tunesien-demokratie-ohne-ertrag-news1113/.

  5. Allal, A. (2012). “Revolutionary” trajectories in Tunisia. Processes of political radicalization 2007–2011. [Trajectoires « révolutionnaires » en Tunisie]. Revue française de science politique, 62(5), 821–841.

  6. Antonakis-Nashif, A. (2016). Contested transformation: mobilized publics in Tunisia between compliance and protest. Mediterranean Politics,21(1), 128–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ashkanian, A. (2007). Democracy promotion and civil society. In M. Albrow, H. Anheier, M. Glasius, M. E. Price, & M. Kaldor (Eds.), Global civil society 2007/08. Communicative power and democracy. Global civil society-yearbooks (pp. 58–85). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beichelt, T., Hahn, I., Schimmelfennig, F., & Worschech, S. (Eds.). (2014). Civil society and democracy promotion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  9. BMZ, (2018). Players. Political Foundations. Retrieved from https://www.bmz.de/en/ministry/approaches/bilateral_development_cooperation/players/political_foundations/index.html.

  10. Borg, S. (2016). The arab uprisings, the liberal civilizing narrative and the problem of orientalism. Middle East Critique,25(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bush, S. S. (2015). The taming of democracy assistence. Why democracy promotion does not confront dictators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carapico, S. (2014). Political aid and arab activism: Democracy promotion, justice, and representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carothers, T. (1999). Aiding democracy abroad. The learning curve. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carothers, T. (2010). The Elusive Synthesis. Journal of Democracy,21(10), 12–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carothers, T. (2018). Tunisia in Transition. A Comparative View. Retrieved from http://carnegieendowment.org/2018/05/30/tunisia-in-transition-comparative-view-pub-76501.

  16. Carothers, T., & Samat-Marram, O. (2015). The new global market place of political change. Retrieved from http://carnegieendowment.org/files/global_marketplace.pdf.

  17. Challand, B. (2005). Looking beyond the pale: International donors and civil society promotion in palestine. The impact of external donors has not always been in favor of the emergence of a Palestinian democratic polity. Palistine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics, and Culture,12(1), 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cherif, Y. (2018). Deligitimizing civil society in Tunisia. Retrieved from http://carnegieendowment.org/2018/05/02/examining-civil-society-legitimacy-pub-76211#cherif.

  19. Claes, T. (2016). Demokratiedividente gesucht. Tunesiens Wirtschaftsrevolution lässt auf sich warten. Retrieved from http://www.fesmena.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdffiles/publications/Demokratiedividende_gesucht.pdf.

  20. Dahl, R. (1982). Dilemmas of pluralist democracy. Autonomy vs. control. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dihstelhoff, J. (2018). Demokratieförderung unter Einbindung der Nahda-Partei. Politischer Islam in Tunesien und in den deutsch-tunesischen Beziehungen. In H. Meyer & M. Rauer (Eds.), Zwischen Kontinuität und Neubeginn. Deutsch-tunesische Beziehungen im Wandel der Zeit. Eine Festschrift zum 30-jährigen Bestehen der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in Tunesien (pp. 31–39). Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eckl, J. (2012). Apekte der Geschichte der Gewerkschaftskoopration der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. In N. Hofmann, J. Eckl, & E. Kerbusch (Eds.), Kooperation mit Gewerkschaften und Förderung von Wirtschafts-und Sozialentwicklung. Zentrale Tätigkeitsfelder der internationalen Arbeit der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung seit Beginn der 1960er-Jahre (pp. 23–106). Bonn: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Faath, S. (2016). Zeiten des Umbruchs in Tunesien seit 2011: Herausforderungen für die Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. In S. Faath, S. Hegasy, V. Vinnai, & A. Vogt (Eds.), Herausforderungen in arabischen Staaten. Die Friedrich Ebert Stiftung im Nahen Osten und in Nordafrika (pp. 285–324). Bonn: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Freedom House (2015). Freedom of the World. Tunisia. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2015/tunisia.

  25. Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit, (2018). Tunesien. Retrieved from https://www.freiheit.org/country/tunesien.

  26. Gana, N. (2013). Introduction: Collaborative Revolutionism. In N. Gana (Ed.), The making of the Tunisian revolution: Context, architects, prospects (pp. 1–34). Edingburgh: Edingburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Glenn, J. K. (2000). Civil society transformed: International aid to new political parties in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,11(2), 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung, (2018). Tunesien. Retrieved from https://www.hss.de/weltweitaktiv/afrika/tunesien/.

  29. Hartshorn, I. M. (2018). Global labor and the arab uprisings: Picking winners in Tunisia and Egypt. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations,24(1), 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, (2015). Jahresbericht 2015. Retrieved from https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/boell-stiftung_jahresbericht-2015.pdf.

  31. Ilse, S. (2018). Warum sich Tunesien an den Fahrplan seiner Verfassung halten sollte. Retrieved from https://www.boell.de/de/2018/01/24/warum-sich-tunesien-an-den-fahrplanseinerverfassung-halten-sollte.

  32. Jamal, M. A. (2012). Democracy promotion, civil society building, and the primacy of politics. Comparative Political Studies,45(1), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kausch, K. (2014). Foreign funding in post-revolutionary Tunisia. Retrieved from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/167265/WP_Tunisia.pdf.

  34. Khalfat, K. (2014). Mapping of the Arab Left: Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Sudan, Morocco, Algeria. Retrieved from http://www.rosaluxna.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Mapping_of_the_Arab_left_Tunisia_en.pdf.

  35. Kurki, M. (2011). Governmentality and EU democracy promotion: The European instrument for democracy and human rights and the construction of democratic civil societies. International Political Sociology, 5, 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lübben, I. (2015). Ennahda und ihr Verhältnis zur Zivilgesellschaft: Selbstverständnis und Praxis. MENA direkt (02).

  37. Mair, S. (2000). Germany’s stiftungen and democracy assistance: Comparative challenges and advantages. In P. Burnell (Ed.), Democracy assistance. International co-operation for development (pp. 128–149). London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maull, H. W. (1990). Germany and Japan: The new civilian powers. Foreign Affairs,69(5), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mitchell, L. A. (2016). The democracy promotion paradox. Washington: The Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mohr, A. (2010). The German political foundations as actors in democracy assistance. Boca Raton: Universal Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nautré, Z. (2008). Die Demokratiserung der arabischen Welt. Nicht-staatliche Demokratieförderung der USA. Retrieved from http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/usa/05393.pdf.

  42. O’Brien, T. (2015). The primacy of political security: contentious politics and insecurity in the Tunisian revolution. Democratization,22(7), 1209–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Öhman, M., Öberg, S. A., Holmström, B., Wockelberg, H., & Åberg, V. (2011). Political Parties and Democracy Assistance. An overview of the support provided by Swedish party associated organisations for democracy development in developing countries and countries in central and eastern Europe. Retrieved from https://www.sida.se/contentassets/3d1a263feee84061bd2b60770fa3e6d7/political-parties-and-democracy-assistance—an-overview-of-the-support-provided-by-swedish-party-associated-organizations-for-_2119.pdf.

  44. Ottaway, M., & Carothers, T. (2000a). Toward Civil Society Realism. In M. Ottaway & T. Carothers (Eds.), Funding virtue. Civil society aid and democracy promotion (pp. 293–310). Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ottaway, M., & Carothers, T. (2000b). The burgeoing world of civil society aid. In M. Ottaway & T. Carothers (Eds.), Funding virtue. Civil society aid and democracy promotion (pp. 3–20). Washington: Carnegie Endowment.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Philipps, A. L. (1999). Exporting democracy: German political foundations in Central-East Europe. Democratization,6(2), 70–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pinto-Duschinsky, M. (1991). Foreign political aid: The German political foundations and their us counterparts. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-),67(1), 33–63.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Quigley, K. F. F. (1997). For democracy’s sake: Foundations and democracy assistance in Central Europe. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Special Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rich, R. (2017). Democracy in crisis: Why, where, how to respond. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rocamora, J., & Gills, B. (1992). Low intensity democracy. Third World Quarterly,13(3), 501–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Schönwälder, G. (2018). Democracy promotion and pluralism—Mapping study. Global Centre for Pluralism. https://www.pluralism.ca/democracy-promotion-and-pluralism-mapping-study/.

  52. Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the century of corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1), 85–131. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1406080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Scott, J. M. (1999). Transnationalizing democracy promotion: The role of Western political foundations and think-tanks. Democratization,6(3), 146–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Spanger, H.-J., & Wolff, J. (2017). The interaction of interests and norms in democracy promotion. Journal of International relations and Development,20(1), 80–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Stacey, S., & Aksartova, S. (2001). The foundations of democracy: U.S. foundation support for civil society in South Africa, 1988–96. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,12(4), 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Weipert-Fenner, I. & Vatthauer, J.-P. (2017). HSFK-Report Nr. 3/2017 Die soziale Frage in Tunesien. Sozioökonomische Proteste und politische Demokratisierung nach 2011. Retrieved from https://www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/HSFK/hsfk_publikationen/Report0317.pdf.

  57. Weipert-Fenner, I. &, Wolff, J. (forthcoming). From North Africa to Latin America and Back: Comparative findings and theoretical reflections. In I. W.-F. a. J. Wolff (Eds.), Socio-economic Protests in Times of Political Change: Post-revolutionary Egypt, Tunisia and Latin American Experiences.

  58. Weissenbach, K. (2010). Political party assistance in transition: the German ‘Stiftungen’ in sub-Saharan Africa. Democratization,17(6), 1225–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Westerwelle, G. (2011). Regierungserklärung des Bundesaußenminister Guido Westerwelle zum Umbruch in der arabischen Welt. Revtrieved from https://www.bundesregierung.de/ContentArchiv/DE/Archiv17/Regierungserklaerung/2011/2011-03-16-westerwelle-arabische-welt.html.

  60. Wolff, J. (2014a). Democracy promotion in Bolivia: The ‘democratic revolution’ of Evo Morales. In J. Wolff, H.-J. Spanger, & H.-J. Puhle (Eds.), The comparative international politics of democracy promotion (pp. 77–106). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wolff, J. (2014b). From the unity of goodness to conflicting objectives: The inherent tensions in the external promotion of democracy and civil society. In T. Beichelt, I. Hahn, F. Schimmelpfennig, & S. Worschech (Eds.), Civil society and democracy promotion (pp. 67–85). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Worschech, S. (2018). Die Herstellung von Zivilgesellschaft. Strategien und Netzwerke der externen Demokratieförderung in der Ukraine. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Yardımcı-Geyikçi, Ş., & Tür, Ö. (2018). Rethinking the Tunisian miracle: a party politics view. Democratization,25, 787–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank the editors, the two anonymous referees, and Jonas Wolff in particular for their instructive comments on this manuscript. Thanks also to Julius Dihstelhoff and Maike Melles for helpful discussions, and to Jana Braun for her editorial assistance. Financial support by the DFG Cluster of Excellence “The Formation of Normative Orders” is gratefully acknowledged. The usual disclaimers apply.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonie Holthaus.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holthaus, L. Furthering Pluralism? The German Foundations in Transitional Tunisia. Voluntas 30, 1284–1296 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00074-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Democracy assistance
  • Civil society aid
  • Political foundations
  • Pluralism
  • Germany
  • Tunisia