Skip to main content

Unveiling Research Trends for Organizational Reputation in the Nonprofit Sector

Abstract

Public scrutiny and the need for funds in a more competitive environment are pressuring nonprofits to be more consciously aware of their reputation. This study used automated analysis with text mining and topic modeling of 177 articles directly linked to nonprofits’ reputation and published up to 2016. After identifying the most salient topics and conducting an in-depth, critical review of the most significant articles within each topic, four theoretical and managerial implications were identified. First, managers need to develop skills to deal with risk, the Internet, and social networks. Second, risk management is an emergent, still tentative, but important topic waiting for more contributions. Third, researchers can apply lexicons developed and validated by experts to uncover knowledge relevant to the entire nonprofit sector’s organizations. Last, the trends and topics highlighted can help scholars and practitioners make better decisions in research or responses to management challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Anheier, H. K., Hass, R., & Beller, A. (2013). Accountability and transparency in the german nonprofit sector: A paradox? International Review of Public Administration,18(3), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2013.10805264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashcroft, L. (2010). Marketing strategies for visibility. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,42(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000609351365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atim, C. (1999). Social movements and health insurance: A critical evaluation of voluntary, non-profit insurance schemes with case studies from Ghana and Cameroon. Social Science and Medicine,48(7), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00390-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnett, M. L., Jermier, J. M., & Lafferty, B. A. (2006). Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review,9(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2010). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,40(5), 924–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010380927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bell, K., Tanner, J., Rutty, J., Astley-Pepper, M., & Hall, R. (2015). Successful partnerships with third sector organisations to enhance the healthcare student experience: A partnership evaluation. Nurse Education Today,35(3), 530–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bronzetti, G., & Veltri, S. (2013). Intellectual capital reporting in the Italian non-profit sector: Analysing a case study. Journal of Intellectual Capital,14(2), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931311323878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burger, R. (2012). Reconsidering the case for enhancing accountability via regulation. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,23(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9238-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Calheiros, A. C., Moro, S., & Rita, P. (2017). Sentiment classification of consumer-generated online reviews using topic modeling. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management,26(7), 675–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2017.1310075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An of corporate theory institutional social responsibility. Academy of Mamagement Review,32(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carman, J. G. (2009). Nonprofits, funders, and evaluation: Accountability in action. The American Review of Public Administration,39(4), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.11203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carman, J. G. (2011). Understanding evaluation in nonprofit organizations. Public Performance & Management Review,34(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576340302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carvalho, A. O., Rodrigues, L. L., & Branco, M. C. (2017). Factors influencing voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of Portuguese foundations. Voluntas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9883-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, Q. (2016). Director monitoring of expense misreporting in nonprofit organizations: The effects of expense disclosure transparency, donor evaluation focus and organization performance. Contemporary Accounting Research,33(4), 1601–1624. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2016). Organizing for crisis management: Building governance capacity and legitimacy. Public Administration Review,76(6), 887–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Comyns, B., & Franklin-Johnson, E. (2018). Corporate reputation and collective crises: A theoretical development using the case of Rana Plaza. Journal of Business Ethics,150, 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3160-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cortez, P. (2014). Modern optimization with R. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Cortez, P., Moro, S., Rita, P., King, D., & Hall, J. (2018). Insights from a text mining survey on Expert Systems research from 2000 to 2016. Expert Systems,35(e12280), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Crofts, K., & Bisman, J. (2010). Interrogating accountability: An illustration of the use of Leximancer software for qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management,7(2), 180–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091011050859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Curran, R., Taheri, B., MacIntosh, R., & O’Gorman, K. (2016). Nonprofit brand heritage its ability to influence volunteer retention, engagement, and satisfaction. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,45(6), 1234–1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016633532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Defourny, J., Gronbjerg, K., Meijs, L., Nyssens, M., & Yamauchi, N. (2016). Voluntas symposium: Comments on Salamon and Sokolowski’s re-conceptualization of the third sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,27(4), 1546–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9743-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review,48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dumont, G. E. (2013). Transparency or accountability? The purpose of online technologies for nonprofits. International Review of Public Administration,18(3), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2013.10805261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eckerd, A., & Moulton, S. (2011). Heterogeneous roles and heterogeneous practices: Understanding the adoption and uses of nonprofit performance evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation,32(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010381780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review,64(2), 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gent, S. E., Crescenzi, M. J. C., Menninga, E. J., & Reid, L. (2015). The reputation trap of NGO accountability. International Theory,7(3), 426–463. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971915000159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gilstrap, C. A., & Smith, S. M. (2016). Identity tensions during an ngo name change: How managers experience an international organization’s rebranding effort. International Journal of Strategic Communication,10(5), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2016.1225302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grant, L. E., & Potoski, M. (2015). Collective reputations affect donations to nonprofits. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,33(4), 835–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Guo, C. (2007). When government becomes the principal philanthropist: Th effects of public funding on patterns of nonprofit governance. Public Administration Review,67(3), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00729.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Halfpenny, P. (2000). Trust, charity and civil society. In F. Tonkiss, A. Passey, N. Fenton, & L. C. Hems (Eds.), Trust and civil society (pp. 132–150). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333981795_8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Harris, E., & Krishnan, J. (2012). The impact of tarnished auditor reputation on nonprofit income. International Journal of Auditing,16(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2011.00445.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Heller, N. A. (2008). The influence of reputation and sector on perceptions of brand alliances of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing,20(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495140802165345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Herman, M. L., Head, G. L., Jackson, P. M., Fogarty, T. E., & Kronstadt, J. (2004). Managing risk in nonprofit organizations: A comprehensive guide. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Howes, M. (1992). Linking paradigms and practice: Key issues in the appraisal, monitoring and evaluation of British NGO Projects. Journal of International Development,4(4), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3380040404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang, S., & Ku, H. (2016). Brand image management for nonprofit organizations: Exploring the relationships between websites, brand images and donations. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research,17(1), 80–96.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hull, C. E., & Lio, B. H. (2006). Innovation in non-profit and for-profit organizations: Visionary, strategic, and financial considerations. Journal of Change Management,6(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010500523418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hume, C., & Hume, M. (2016). What about us? Exploring small to medium Australian not for-profit firms and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management,20(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2014-0497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kaplan, R. S. (2001). Strategic performance measurement and management in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership,11(3), 354. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.11308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Keating, E. K., & Frumkin, P. (2003). Reengineering nonprofit financial accountability: Toward a more reliable foundation for regulation. Public Administration Review,63(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kendall, J., & Knapp, M. (2000). Measuring the performance of voluntary organizations. Public Management Review,2(1), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030000000006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kotler, P., & Murray, M. (1975). Third sector management—The role of marketing. Public Administration Review,35(5), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.2307/974176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lecy, J. D., Schmitz, H. P., & Swedlund, H. (2012). Non-governmental and not-for-profit organizational effectiveness: A modern synthesis. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,23(2), 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9204-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Liket, K., & Simaens, A. (2013). Battling the devolution in the research on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics,126(2), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1921-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ling, Q., & Neely, D. G. (2013). Charitable ratings and financial reporting quality: Evidence from the human service sector. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management,25(1), 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like: A systematic review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,45(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014561796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Manetti, G. (2014). The role of blended value accounting in the evaluation of socio-economic impact of social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,25(2), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9346-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Martínez, C. V. (2003). Social alliances for fundraising: How spanish nonprofits are hedging the risks. Journal of Business Ethics,47(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026212902564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McPherson, E. (2015). Advocacy organizations’ evaluation of social media information for NGO journalism the evidence and engagement models. American Behavioral Scientist,59(1), 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203255211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Meijer, M.-M. (2009). The effects of charity reputation on charitable giving. Corporate Reputation Review,12(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2009.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mitchell, G. E. (2015). The attributes of effective NGOs and the leadership values associated with a reputation for organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership,26(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mitchell, G. E., & Stroup, S. S. (2016). The reputations of NGOs: Peer evaluations of effectiveness. The Review of International Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-016-9259-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Moro, S., Cortez, P., & Rita, P. (2015). Business intelligence in banking: A literature analysis from 2002 to 2013 using text mining and latent Dirichlet allocation. Expert Systems with Applications,42(3), 1314–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Moro, S., & Rita, P. (2018). Brand strategies in social media in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,301(1), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2016-0340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Moxham, C. (2014). Understanding third sector performance measurement system design: A literature review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,63(6), 704–726. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2013-0143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Nguyen, N. (2006). The perceived image of service cooperatives: An investigation in Canada and Mexico. Corporate Reputation Review,9(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. O’leary, S. (2016). Grassroots accountability promises in rights-based approaches to development: The role of transformative monitoring and evaluation in NGOs. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ortmann, A., & Schlesinger, M. (1997). Trust, repute and the role of non-profit enterprise. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,8(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Padanyi, P., & Gainer, B. (2003). Peer reputation in the nonprofit sector: Its role in nonprofit sector management. Corporate Reputation Review,6(3), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Pfeffer, J., & Slancik, G. R. (1978). Social control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Poister, T. H., & Thomas, J. C. (2007). The wisdom of crowds: Learning from administrators’ predictions of citizen perceptions. Public Administration Review,67(2), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00713.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rho, E., Yun, T., & Lee, K. (2015). Does organizational image matter? Image, identification, and employee behaviors in public and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review,75(3), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Salamon, L. M., & Sokolowski, S. W. (2016). Beyond nonprofits: Re-conceptualizing the third sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,27(4), 1515–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9726-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sarstedt, M., & Schloderer, M. P. (2010). Developing a measurement approach for reputation of non-profit organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing,15(3), 276–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Saxton, G. D., & Wang, L. (2014). The social network effect: The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,43(5), 850–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013485159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Schloderer, M. P., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2014). The relevance of reputation in the nonprofit sector: The moderating effect of socio-demographic characteristics. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing,19(2014), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Schmidt, D. E. (1993). Public opinion and media coverage of labor unions. Journal of Labor Research,14(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Smith, D. H., Stebbins, R. A., & Dover, M. A. (2006). Nonprofit terms & concepts. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tidwell, M. V. (2005). A social identity model of prosocial behaviors within nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership,15(4), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Torres-Moraga, E., Vásquez-Parraga, A. Z., & Barra, C. (2010). Antecedents of donor trust in an emerging charity sector: The role of reputation, familiarity, opportunism and communication. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences,6(29), 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Tremblay-Boire, J., Prakash, A., & Gugerty, M. K. (2016). Regulation by reputation: Monitoring and sanctioning in nonprofit accountability clubs. Public Administration Review,76(5), 712–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Wahlén, C. B. (2014). Constructing conservation impact: Understanding monitoring and evaluation in conservation NGOs. Conservation and Society,12(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.132133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Willems, J. (2016). Organizational crisis resistance: Examining leadership mental models of necessary practices to resist crises and the role of organizational context. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,27(6), 2807–2832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9753-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Williams, C. C. (2004). Community capacity building: A critical evaluation of the third sector approach. Review of Policy Research,21(5), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00104.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Witesman, E. M. (2016). An institutional theory of the nonprofit: Toll goods and voluntary action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,45(4S), 97S–115S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016651729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Xie, Y., Hui, C. L., & Ng, S. F. (2010). The evaluation of quality attributes of NPO products: A case in medical garments. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence,21(5), 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2010.481515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Zchout, S. L., & Tal, A. (2016). Conflict versus consensus strategic orientations among environmental NGOs: An empirical evaluation. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,28(3), 1110–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9723-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, grants UID/MULTI/4466/2016 and UID/GES/00315/2013. The authors also would like to thank the valuable suggestions made by the Editor and the Anonymous Reviewers during the peer-review process.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Márcia R. C. Santos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix: Search Query

Appendix: Search Query

(Reputation OR image OR identity OR opinion OR judgment OR evaluation OR estimation OR belief) AND (“nongovernmental org*” OR “ngo*” OR “charities” OR “nonprofit*” OR “npo*” OR “foundations” OR “association*” OR “civic org*” OR “social org*” OR “religious congregation*” OR “faith based org*” OR “volunteer promotion org*” OR “advocacy org*” OR “labor union*” OR “cooperatives” OR “mutuals” OR “social enterprise*” OR “voluntary sector” OR “independent sector” OR “third sector” OR “civil society sector” OR “tax-exempt sector” OR “not-for-profit” OR “philanthropic sector” OR “social sector” OR “voluntary org*” OR “public interest group*” OR “public benefit entit*” OR “donee org*” OR “membership org*” OR “professional org*” OR “social org*” OR “civic org*” OR “social economy”).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santos, M.R.C., Laureano, R.M.S. & Moro, S. Unveiling Research Trends for Organizational Reputation in the Nonprofit Sector. Voluntas 31, 56–70 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00055-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Nonprofit organizations
  • Reputation
  • Text mining
  • Topic modeling