Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Revenue Diversification on Output Creation in Nonprofit Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonprofits continue to be faced with financial challenges to fulfill their missions. Both the academic literature and nonprofit practitioners have explored revenue diversification and concentration strategies to meet these challenges. While these two strategies are essentially antagonistic, both have received support as being viable strategies to create better outcomes for the organization. This article examines whether revenue diversification or concentration strategies lead to greater mission outputs in a nonprofit context. Using resource dependence theory as a guiding framework, two opposing hypotheses are tested to gain more insight into the diversification versus concentration dilemma. A unique dataset is built and utilized to estimate a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model to assess the correlation between revenue diversification and mission outputs. Results indicate that revenue diversification (and not concentration) is associated with an increase in organizational outputs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adarkwa, K. K., & Oppong, R. A. (2007). Poverty reduction through the creation of a liveable housing environment: A case study of habitat for humanity international housing units in rural Ghana. Property Management, 25(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminate analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burde, G., Rosenfeld, A., & Sheaffer, Z. (2017). Prediction of financial vulnerability to funding instability. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(2), 280–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callen, J. L., Klein, A., & Tinkelman, D. (2010). The contextual impact of nonprofit board composition and structure on organizational performance: Agency and resource dependence perspectives. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(1), 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. A., & Lambright, K. T. (2016). Program performance and multiple constituency theory. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 150–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, D. A., & Stater, K. J. (2008). Revenue diversification in nonprofit organizations: Does it lead to financial stability? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 947–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. F., & Tuckman, H. P. (1994). Revenue diversification among nonprofits. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 5(3), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. F., & Tuckman, H. P. (2001). Financial vulnerability and attrition as measures of nonprofit performance. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62(4), 655–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelliah, J., Boersma, M., & Klettner, A. (2016). Governance challenges for not-for-profit organizations: Empirical evidence in support of a contingency approach. Contemporary Management Research, 12(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chikoto, G. L., Ling, Q., & Neely, D. G. (2016). The adoption and use of the Hirschman-Herfindahl index in nonprofit research: Does revenue diversification measurement matter? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(3), 1425–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriks, C., Decker, P. J., Ainsworth, N., Ward, R., Durand, R., Mitchell, J., et al. (2015). A study of the psycho, social, and economic impact of a US habitat for humanity affiliate. Housing, Care and Support, 18(1), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 246–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, P., & Keating, E. K. (2011). Diversification reconsidered: The risks and rewards of revenue concentration. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L., Menon, K., & Schwartz, K. (1990). Predicting bankruptcy for firms in financial distress. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 17(1), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gras, D., & Mendoza-Abarca, K. I. (2014). Risky business? The survival implications of exploiting commercial opportunities by nonprofits. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, C., & Acar, M. (2005). Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizations: Combining resource dependency, institutional, and network perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(3), 340–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habitat for Humanity. (2018). Our mission, vision, and principles. Retrieved from https://www.habitat.org/about/mission-and-vision.

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, S. L., & Saidel, J. R. (1994). Board members’ influence on the government-nonprofit relationship. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 5(2), 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. A., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Strategy-organization configurations in corporate venture units: Impact on performance and survival. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4), 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. M., & Piccolo, R. F. (2005). Funding source, board involvement techniques, and financial vulnerability in nonprofit organizations: A test of resource dependence. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 16(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, M., & Quigley, J. M. (2006). Economic fundamentals in local housing markets: Evidence from U.S. metropolitan regions. Journal of Regional Science, 46(3), 425–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). Social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. (2017). The relationship of nonprofits’ financial health to program outcomes: Empirical evidence from nonprofit arts organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(3), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W. (2010). Nonprofit revenue diversification and organizational performance: An empirical study of New Jersey human services and community improvement organizations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Newark, NJ: Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malatesta, D., & Smith, C. R. (2014). Lessons from resource dependence theory for contemporary public and nonprofit management. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, W. J., Wang, H., Egginton, J. F., & Flint, H. S. (2014). The impact of revenue diversification on expected revenue and volatility for nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2), 374–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlson, J. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prange, C., & Verdier, S. (2011). Dynamic capabilities, internationalization processes and performance. Journal of World Business, 46(1), 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, C. R. (2016). Understanding nonprofit financial health: Exploring the effects of organizational and environmental variables. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(5), 888–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G. (1980). Board power and organizational effectiveness among human service agencies. Academy of Management Journal, 23(2), 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, M., & Hamilton, R. D. (2015). Who determines how nonprofits confront uncertainty? Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 25(4), 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J., & Wang, J. Q. (2016). Revenue diversification in housing nonprofits: Impact of state funding environments. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(3), 548–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, B. (2010). Through which lens? Contingency and institutional approaches to conceptualizing organizational performance in the not-for-profit sector. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 8(1), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, H. P., & Chang, C. F. (1991). A methodology for measuring the financial vulnerability of charitable nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(4), 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group. (2011). Zero-Inflated negative binomial regression: Stata data analysis examples. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/dae/zero-inflated-negative-binomial-regression/. Accessed March 5, 2018.

  • Ulrich, D., & Barney, J. B. (1984). Perspectives in organizations: Resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 471–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen, S., Christiaens, J., & Milis, K. (2011). Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations’ compliance with reporting standards? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen, S., Christiaens, J., Reheul, A., & Van Caneghem, T. (2015). Analysis of audit fees for nonprofits: Resource dependence and agency theory approaches. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(4), 734–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witesman, E. M., & Fernandez, S. (2013). Government contracts with private organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 689–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley S. Holliday.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berrett, J.L., Holliday, B.S. The Effect of Revenue Diversification on Output Creation in Nonprofit Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Voluntas 29, 1190–1201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00049-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00049-5

Keywords

Navigation