Skip to main content
Log in

Get Money Get Involved? NGO’s Reactions to Donor Funding and Their Potential Involvement in the Public Policy Processes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates how NGOs’ reactions to donors may suggest their potential involvement in the policy process. Without pretending to abridge a multifaceted complicated situation in any singular factor or to make claims for causality and generalizability, the experiences of three NGOs in Lebanon are compared. The analysis reveals that a variation in NGOs’ relationship with the same donor might reflect on different level of involvement in the policy process and interactions with government. Constructing strong, yet balanced, ties with the donor contributes to active involvement in the policy process and cooperation with government. Otherwise, the NGO’s role is marginalized. Abandoning donor funding furthers change in the nature of NGO work, leaning more towards activism and generating confrontation with the government. Donor funding, therefore, is neither a necessary condition for nor a universal effect on NGOs’ potential engagement in public policy processes.

Résumé

Cet article explore les relations entre, d’une part la réaction des ONG au financement par les bailleurs de fonds, et d’autre part leur implication dans les politiques publiques ainsi que le type de leurs interactions avec le gouvernement. Les expériences de trois ONG au Liban sont ici comparées sans prétendre résumer à une unique variable une situation compliquée et aux multiples facettes, et sans introduire de lien de causalité ni généraliser. L’analyse révèle qu’un changement de relation des ONG avec un même bailleur de fonds peut avoir des conséquences à différents niveaux en termes d’interaction avec le gouvernement et d’implication dans les processus politiques. L’établissement de liens forts mais équilibrés avec le bailleur de fonds favorise l’implication dans les processus politiques et la coopération avec le gouvernement. Sans cela, le rôle des ONG est marginalisé. En abandonnant le financement par les bailleurs de fonds, le travail des ONG change de nature; il se rapproche alors davantage de la défense d’intérêts et génère des confrontations avec le gouvernement. Par conséquent, le financement par les bailleurs de fonds n’est pas une condition nécessaire et n’a pas d’effet universel sur l’implication des ONG quant aux politiques publiques.

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag wird die Beziehung zwischen der Handhabung der Finanzierung durch Spender seitens nicht-staatlicher Organisationen einerseits und ihrer Beteiligung an den Prozessen der öffentlichen Politik und die Art ihrer Interaktionen mit der Regierung andererseits untersucht. Ohne eine vielfältige komplizierte Situation einzelner Umstände vereinfachen oder Anspruch auf eine Kausalität und Verallgemeinerbarkeit erheben zu wollen, werden die Erfahrungen von drei nicht-staatlichen Organisationen im Libanon miteinander verglichen. Die Untersuchung zeigt, dass unterschiedliche Beziehungen der nicht-staatlichen Organisationen mit dem gleichen Spender ein unterschiedliches Maß an Beteiligung am politischen Prozess und unterschiedlich ausgeprägte Interaktionen mit der Regierung widerspiegeln können. Der Aufbau starker, jedoch ausgeglichener Beziehungen zum Spender fördert eine aktive Beteiligung am politischen Prozess und die Zusammenarbeit mit der Regierung. Ansonsten wird die Rolle der nicht-staatlichen Organisation marginalisiert. Der Verzicht auf eine Finanzierung durch Spender führt zu einer Änderung im Wesen der Arbeit der nicht-staatlichen Organisation, wodurch die Organisation dann eher zu einer Interessenvertretung wird und Konfrontationen mit der Regierung entstehen. Eine Finanzierung durch Spender stellt folglich weder eine notwendige Voraussetzung für die Beteiligung an politischen Prozessen seitens der nicht-staatlichen Organisationen dar noch wirkt sie sich allgemein auf ihre Beteiligung an diesen Prozessen aus.

Resumen

El presente artículo investiga la relación entre las reacciones de las ONG ante la financiación de donantes, por un lado, y su implicación en los procesos de la política pública y el tipo de interacciones que tienen con el gobierno, por otro lado. Sin pretender resumir una situación complicada con múltiples facetas en un factor singular o argumentar causalidad y generalizabilidad, se comparan las experiencias de tres ONG en el Líbano. El análisis revela que una variación en la relación de las ONG con el mismo donante puede reflejarse en un nivel diferente de implicación en el proceso de la política y en las interacciones con el gobierno. Construir lazos fuertes, pero equilibrados, con el donante contribuye a una implicación activa en el proceso de la política y en la cooperación con el gobierno. De lo contrario, el papel de las ONG es marginado. Abandonar la financiación de donantes fomenta el cambio en la naturaleza del trabajo de la ONG, volcándose más hacia la defensa y generando confrontación con el gobierno. Por consiguiente, la financiación de donantes no es una condición necesaria ni tiene un efecto universal sobre el compromiso de la ONG en los procesos de política pública.

摘要

本文研究非政府组织(NGO)对捐赠人捐款的响应与其在公共政策过程中的参与程度及其与政府的沟通方式之间的关系。在未将多因素的复杂情况简化为单一因素或论述因果关系及普遍性的前提下,本文对比了黎巴嫩三家NGO的经历。分析结果显示,NGO与同一捐赠人关系的变动可能表明NGO参与政策过程的程度及与政府的沟通程度存在差异。与捐赠人构建密切平衡的关系有助于NGO积极参与政策过程,与政府展开合作。否则,NGO将会被边缘化。放弃捐赠人捐款会进一步改变NGO的工作性质,使其更倾向于倡导组织,从而与政府产生冲突。因此,捐赠人捐款既不是NGO参与公共政策过程的必要条件,也不会对其造成普遍影响。

ملخص

هذا المقال يبحث في العلاقة بين تفاعلات المنظمات الغير حكومية (NGOs) للتمويل من الجهات المانحة، من جهة، وإشتراكهم في عمليات السياسة العامة ونوع التفاعلات لديهم مع الحكومة، من ناحية أخرى. دون إدعاء إختصار وضع معقد متعدد الأوجه في أي عامل منفرد أو تقديم إدعاءات عن السبب والتعميم، تمت مقارنة تجارب ثلاث منظمات غير حكومية (NGOs) في لبنان. التحليل يكشف عن أن الإختلاف في علاقة المنظمات الغير حكومية (NGOs) مع نفس الجهات المانحة قد ينعكس على مستوى مختلف من المشاركة في عملية وضع السياسات والتفاعلات مع الحكومة. إنشاء روابط قوية ٬ متوازنة أيضا˝ ، مع المانحين يسهم في المشاركة الفعالة في العملية السياسية والتعاون مع الحكومة. خلاف ذلك، يتم تهميش دور المنظمات الغير حكومية (NGOs). التخلي عن تمويل الجهة المانحة يعزز التغيير في طبيعة عمل المنظمات الغير حكومية (NGOs)، يميل أكثر نحو الدعوة ويتسبب في المواجهة مع الحكومة. التمويل من الجهات المانحة، بالتالي، ليس شرطا˝ ضروريا˝ للتأثير العالمي بشأن إشراك المنظمات الغير حكومية (NGOs) في عمليات السياسات العامة.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AbouAssi, K. (2006). Lebanese civil society: A long history of achievements, facing decisive challenges ahead of an uncertain future. Johannesburg: CIVICUS.

    Google Scholar 

  • AbouAssi, K. (2010). International development management through a southern lens. Public Administration and Development, 30(2), 116–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AbouAssi, K. (2013). Hands in the pockets of mercurial donors: NGOs response to shifting funding priorities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(3), 584–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AbouAssi, K., & Trent, D. (2012). Understanding local participation amidst challenges: Evidence from Lebanon in the Global South. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Advance online publication.

  • Altan-Olcay, O., & Icduygu, A. (2012). Mapping civil society in the Middle East: The cases of Egypt, Lebanon and Turkey. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 39(2), 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barman, E. (2002). Asserting difference: The strategic response of nonprofit organizations to competition. Social Forces, 80(4), 1191–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. (2004). NGOs and uneven development: Geographies of development intervention. Progress in Human Development, 28(6), 725–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, F. (2002). Aid dependency in Bosnian politics and civil society: Failures and successes of post-war peacebuilding in Bosnia–Herzegovina. Croatian International Relations Review, Jan–June, pp. 25–30.

  • Blee, K., & Taylor, V. (2002). Semi-structured interviewing in social movement research. In B. Klandermans & S. Staggenborg (Eds.), Methods of social movement research (pp. 92–117). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, M. (1990). Non-governmental organizations in Africa: Can they influence public policy? Development and Change, 21, 87–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, D. W. (1999). Exploring state—Civil society collaboration: Policy partnerships in developing countries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(Suppl 1), 59–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Government–nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, J. M., & Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2002). Government–nonprofit relations in comparative perspective: Evolution, themes and new directions. Public Administration and Development, 22, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2006). International development management in a globalized world. In Eric Otenyo & Nancy Lind (Eds.), Comparative public administration: The essential readings. Stamford: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, J. M., & Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2010). International development management: A northern perspective. Public Administration and Development, 30(2), 102–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, I. (2000). Weak democracy and civil society promotion: The cases of Egypt and Palestine. In T. Carothers & M. Ottaway (Eds.), Funding virtue: Civil society aid and democracy promotion (pp. 21–48). Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., & Kalegaonkar, A. (2002). Support organizations and the evolution of the NGO sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(2), 231–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, C., & Kappaz, C. (2005). Reducing poverty, building peace. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, H. J. (2006). Nonprofits as social capital and agents in the public policy process: Toward a new paradigm. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 311–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1966). Pattern matching as an essential in distal knowing. In K. R. Hammond (Ed.), The psychology of Egon Brunsvik (pp. 81–106). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassarino, J. P. (2012). Reversing the hierarchy of priorities in EU–Mediterranean relations. In J. Peters (Ed.), The European Union and the Arab Spring: Promoting democracy and human rights in the Middle East (pp. 1–16). Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudle, S. L. (2004). Qualitative data analysis. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 417–438). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, E. (2006). The constitution of citizens: The political theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 207–220). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., de la Vega, R., & Watson, G. (2001). Advocacy for social justice: A global action and reflection guide. London: Oxfam Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dichter, T. W. (2003). Despite good intentions: Why development assistance to the third world has failed. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degnbol-Martinussen, J., & Engberg-Pedersen, P. (2003). Aid: Understanding international development cooperation. New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiNardo, J. (2008). Natural experiments and quasi-natural experiments. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave dictionary of economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doornbos, M. (2003). Good governance: The metamorphosis of a policy metaphor. Journal of International Affairs, 57(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, T. (1971). The structure of dependence. In K. T. Fann & D. C. Hodges (Eds.), Readings in U.S. imperialism (pp. 225–236). Boston, MA: Porter Sargent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2007). The White Man’s burden: Why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. (2004). Civil society. Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. (2008). Have NGOs made a difference? In A. Bebbington, S. Hickey, & D. C. Mitlin (Eds.), Can NGOs make a difference? The challenge of development alternatives (pp. 38–52). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M., Hulme, D., & Wallace, T. (1999). NGOs in a global future: Marrying local delivery to worldwide leverage. Public Administration and Development, 19(2), 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Haraka, M. (2004). The legal framework of associations in Lebanon. In L. Ball-Lechgar & G. Makarem (Eds.), Internal governance for NGOs in Lebanon (pp. 13–28). Lebanon: IEC Unit, Ministry of Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (1994). The anti-politics machine. ‘Development’, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. F. (1997). Doing good? The politics and antipolitics of NGO practices. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 439–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A. (1997). Striking a balance: A guide to enhancing the effectiveness Of NGOs in international development. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid, S. (2010). Civil society in the Arab World and the dilemma of funding. http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2010/10_middle_east_hamid.aspx.

  • Hanafi, S., & Tabar, L. (2003). The intifada and the aid industry: The impact of the new liberal agenda on the Palestinian NGOs. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 23(1–2), 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helou, Z. (2004). Mobilizing NGO human and financial resources. In L. Ball-Lechgar & G. Makarem (Eds.), Internal governance for NGOs in Lebanon (pp. 97–108). Lebanon: IEC Unit, Ministry of Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V., Wilde, M., & Polillo, S. (2008). Essays in “From the archives: Innovative use of data in comparative historical research”. Trajectories: Newsletter of the Comparative Historical Section of the ASA, 19(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. C. (1990). Getting to the 21st century: Voluntary action and the global agenda. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., & Kanji, N. (2009). Non-governmental organizations and development. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillehammer, G. C. (2003). StateNGO relationships in transitional democracies. United Nations Development program.

  • Loung, P. J., & Weinthal, E. (1999). The NGO paradox: Democratic goals and non-democratic outcomes in Kazakhstan. Europe-Asia Studies, 51(7), 1267–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitlin, D., Hickey, S., & Bebbington, A. (2007). Reclaiming development? NGOs and the challenge of alternatives. World Development, 35(10), 1699–1720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D. (2005). Cultivating development: An ethnography of aid policy and practice. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najam, A. (2000). The four-C’s of third sector–government relations: Cooperation, confrontation, complementarity, and co-optation. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10(4), 375–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. (2012). Europe and the challenge of the Arab Spring. In J. Peters (Ed.), The European Union and the Arab Spring: Promoting democracy and human rights in the Middle East (pp. xi–xxi). Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, R. (1959). Commercial policy in the underdeveloped countries. American Economic Review, 49, 251–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D., & Montgomery, J. D. (2005). Regime change and nation building: Can donors restore governance in post-conflict states? Public Administration and Development, 25(1), 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. D. (2005). The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. R., & Gronbjerg, K. A. (2006). Scope and theory of government–nonprofit relations. In The Nonprofit (Ed.), Sector: A research handbook. Boston: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. (2006). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In The Nonprofit (Ed.), Sector: A research handbook. Boston: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, K. W. (2002). Civil society by design: Donors, NGOs, and the intermestic development circle in Bangladesh. Santa Barbara: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman, L. (2013). The NGOs and the grand illusions of development and democracy. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(1), 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thies, C. (2006). A pragmatic guide to qualitative historical analysis in the study of international relations. International Studies Perspectives, 3(4), 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trachtenberg, M. (2006). Working with primary documents. Appendix II of the craft of international history. Princeton. http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/trachtenberg/methbk/AppendixII(ucla).html.

  • Vakil, A. (1997). Confronting the classification problem: Toward a taxonomy of NGOs. World Development, 25(12), 2057–2070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Slyke, D. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government–nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. R. (2000). Alternative models of government–nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. R. (2006). Complementary, supplementary, or adversarial? A theoretical and historical examination of nonprofit–government relations in the United States. In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 37–80). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank the study participants for their cooperation and insights and is also grateful to several anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khaldoun AbouAssi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

AbouAssi, K. Get Money Get Involved? NGO’s Reactions to Donor Funding and Their Potential Involvement in the Public Policy Processes. Voluntas 25, 968–990 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9389-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9389-y

Keywords

Navigation