Abstract
This study investigated the influences of resources and subjective dispositions on formal and informal volunteering. The author examined whether resources are associated with formal volunteering, while subjective dispositions are associated with informal volunteering, using data from representative national Japanese samples (SSP-P2010 data). The results suggested that socioeconomic resources (namely education) are more strongly related to formal volunteering than to informal volunteering, while subjective dispositions (empathy and religious mind) are associated with both formal and informal volunteering. The main finding of the present study was that empathy and religious mind are the essential facilitators of both types of volunteering with different characteristics.
Résumé
Cette étude enquête sur les façons dont les ressources et les dispositions subjectives influencent le bénévolat formel et informel. L’auteur pose la question de savoir si les ressources seraient associées avec le bénévolat formel alors que les dispositions subjectives seraient associées avec le bénévolat informel. La question est abordée en utilisant les données d’échantillons japonais représentatifs à l’échelle nationale (données SSP-P2010). Les résultats suggèrent que les ressources socio-économiques (en particulier l’éducation) sont plus fortement liées au bénévolat formel qu’informel, alors que les dispositions subjectives (l’empathie et la religiosité) sont associées au bénévolat formel comme informel. La découverte principale de la présente étude est que l’empathie et la religiosité facilitent les deux types de bénévolat suivant des modalités différentes.
Zusammenfassung
Diese Studie untersuchte den Einfluss von Ressourcen und subjektiven Neigungen auf formale und informale ehrenamtliche Tätigkeiten. Der Autor prüfte, ob Ressourcen mit formalen ehrenamtlichen Tätigkeiten und subjektive Neigungen mit informalen ehrenamtlichen Tätigkeiten in Verbindung stehen, indem er sich auf die Daten repräsentativer landesweit erhobener Stichproben aus Japan stützte (SSP-P2010-Daten). Die Ergebnisse wiesen darauf hin, dass sozioökonomische Ressourcen (nämlich Bildung) in engerer Beziehung zu formalen als zu informalen ehrenamtlichen Tätigkeiten stehen, während subjektive Neigungen (Mitgefühl und religiöse Überzeugungen) sowohl mit formalen als auch informalen ehrenamtlichen Tätigkeiten verbunden sind. Das wichtigste Ergebnis der vorliegenden Studie war, dass Mitgefühl und religiöse Überzeugungen der hauptsächliche Grund für beide Arten ehrenamtlicher Tätigkeiten mit ihren unterschiedlichen Merkmalen waren.
Resumen
El presente estudio investigó las influencias de los recursos y de las disposiciones subjetivas en el voluntariado formal e informal. El autor examinó si los recursos se asocian al voluntariado formal, mientras que las disposiciones subjetivas se asocian al voluntariado informal, utilizando datos de muestras nacionales japonesas representativas (datos SSP-P2010). Los resultados sugirieron que los recursos socioeconómicos (a saber, la educación) están más fuertemente relacionados con el voluntariado formal que con el voluntariado informal, mientras que las disposiciones subjetivas (empatía y mentalidad religiosa) se asocian al voluntariado formal e informal. El principal hallazgo del presente estudio fue que la empatía y la mentalidad religiosa son los facilitadores esenciales de ambos tipos de voluntariado con diferentes características.
摘要
本文调查了资源和主观性情对正式和非正式志愿活动的影响。作者运用日本的全国代表性样本数据(SSP-P2010数据),评估资源是否与正式志愿活动相关、主观性情是否与非正式志愿活动相关。结果显示,社会经济资源(即教育)与正式志愿活动的关联较强,与非正式志愿活动的关联较弱,而主观性情(同情心和宗教观念)与正式志愿活动和非正式志愿活动都存在关联。本次研究的主要结论是,同情心与宗教观念是两类不同志愿活动的必要推动因素。
ملخص
بحثت هذه الدراسة التأثيرات من الموارد والتصرفات الشخصية على العمل التطوعي الرسمي و الغير رسمي. المؤلف فحص ما إذا كانت الموارد مرتبطة مع العمل التطوعي الرسمي، في حين ترتبط التصرفات ذات الصلة بالخبرة الذاتية مع العمل التطوعي الغير رسمي، بإستخدام بيانات من ممثل عينات بيانات الوطنية اليابانية ((SSP-P2010. تشير النتائج إلى أن الموارد الاقتصادية والاجتماعية (أي التعليم) لها علاقة بقوة للعمل التطوعي الرسمي أكثر من العمل التطوعي الغير رسمي، في حين ترتبط التصرفات ذات الصلة بالخبرة الذاتية (التعاطف والعقل الديني) بكل من العمل التطوعي الرسمي و الغير رسمي. تمثلت النتيجة الرئيسية للدراسة الحالية في أن التعاطف والعقل الديني هما الميسرين أساسيا˝ لكل من النوعين من العمل التطوعي مع خصائص مختلفة.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107–122.
Becker, P. E., & Dhingra, P. H. (2001). Religious involvement and volunteering: Implications for civil society. Sociology of Religion, 62(3), 315–335.
Bekkers, R. (2005). Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources, personality, and political values. Political Psychology, 26(3), 439–454.
Bekkers, R. (2006). Traditional and health-related philanthropy: The role of resources and personality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(4), 349–366.
Bekkers, R. (2010). Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money. Social Science Research, 39(3), 369–381.
Brady, H. E., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (1999). Prospecting for participants: Rational expectations and the recruitment of political activists. The American Political Science Review, 93(1), 153–168.
Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond Ses: A resource model of political participation. The American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294.
Cabinet Office. (2012). NPO hojin no shinseijyurisu/ninsyosu [The number of application acceptance and authentication of incorporated nonprofit organizations]. Retrieved April 1, 2012 from https://www.npo-homepage.go.jp/data/pref.html.
Cnaan, R., Handy, F., & Wadsworth, M. (1996). Defining who is a volunteer: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(3), 364–383.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126.
Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison: WCB Brown and Benchmark.
Davis, M. H., Mitchell, K. V., Hall, J. A., Lothert, J., Snapp, T., & Meyer, M. (1999). Empathy, expectations, and situational preferences: Personality influences on the decision to participate in volunteer helping behaviors. Journal of Personality, 67(3), 469–503.
Day, K. M., & Devlin, R. A. (1996). Volunteerism and crowding out: Canadian econometric evidence. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 29(1), 37–53.
Dekker, P., & Broek, A. vd. (1998). Civil society in comparative perspective: Involvement in voluntary associations in North America and Western Europe. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9, 11–38.
Einolf, C. J. (2008). Empathic concern and prosocial behaviors: A test of experimental results using survey data. Social Science Research, 37, 1267–1279.
Freeman, R. B. (1997). Working for nothing: The supply of volunteer labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), S140–S166.
Gallagher, S. K. (1994). Doing their share: Comparing patterns of help given by older and younger adults. Journal of Marriage & Family, 56(3), 567–578.
Hustinx, L., Cnaan, R. A., & Handy, F. (2010). Navigating theories of volunteering: A hybrid map for a complex phenomenon. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40(4), 410–434.
Inaba, K. (2011). Unconscious religiosity and social capital. Religion and Social Contribution, 1, 3–26.
Inouye, J. E. (2007). Effect of institutional trust on formal and informal volunteering. Paper presented at the 102nd Annual Meeting of American Sociological Association, New York, August 11–14, 2007.
Ishii, K. (2007). Gendainihonjin no syukyo [Religion of modern Japanese]. Tokyo: Shinyosya.
Jackson, E. F., Bachmeier, M. D., Wood, J. R., & Craft, E. A. (1995). Volunteering and charitable giving: Do religious and associational ties promote helping behavior? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), 59–78.
Kawabata, S. (1997). Shukyo to fukushibunka [Religiosity and welfare culture]. In Y. Ichibangase, H. Kobayashi, S. Kawabata, & S. Sonoda (Eds.), Fukushibunkaron (The theory of welfare culture) (pp. 67–76). Tokyo: Yuhikaku Publishing Co.
Lam, P. Y. (2002). As the flocks gather: How religion affects voluntary association participation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(3), 405–422.
Loveland, M. T., Sikkink, D., Myers, D. J., & Radcliff, B. (2005). Private prayer and civic involvement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(1), 1–14.
Markham, W. T., & Bonjean, C. M. (1996). Employment status and the attitudes and behavior of higher status women volunteers, 1975 and 1992: A case study. Sex Roles, 34, 695–716.
McPherson, J. M., & Rotolo, T. (1996). Testing a dynamic model of social composition: Diversity and change in voluntary groups. American Sociological Review, 61(2), 179–202.
Menchik, P. L., & Weisbrod, B. A. (1987). Volunteer labor supply. Journal of Public Economics, 32(2), 159–183.
Mitani, H. (2012). Who are voluntary carers? Reexamination of the “K” pattern in volunteering. Kansai Sociological Review, 11, 29–40.
Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2007). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Musick, M. A., Wilson, J., & Bynum, W. B. (2000). Race and formal volunteering: The differential effects of class and religion. Social Forces, 78(4), 1539–1570.
Nihei, N. (2008). Civic participation and social stratification in Japan: Focusing on the participatory inequality and political attitudes. In G. Doba (Ed.), Publicness and Economic on Equality in Contemporary Japan (pp. 189–210). Sendai: The study group of the national survey of social stratification and social mobility in 2005.
O’Connell, A. A. (2006). Logistic regression models for ordinal response variables. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Omoto, A., & Snyder, M. (1993). Volunteers and their motivations and theoretical issues and practical concerns. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 4, 157–176.
Penner, L. A., & Finkelstein, M. A. (1998). Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 525–537.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Reitsma, J., Scheepers, P., & Grotenhuis, M. T. (2006). Dimensions of individual religiosity and charity: Cross-National effect differences in European countries? Review of Religious Research, 47(4), 347–362.
Rosenthal, S., Feiring, C., & Lewis, M. (1998). Political volunteering from late adolescence to young adulthood: Patterns and predictors. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 477–493.
Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. D. (2006). National context, religiosity, and volunteering: Results from 53 countries. American Sociological Review, 71(2), 191–210.
Sakurai, S. (1994). Factors of multidimensional empathy scale and their relations to personality traits. Bulletin of Institute for Educational Research of Nara University of Education, 30, 125–132.
Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & Associates. (2004). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector, Vol. 2. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
Smith, T. W. (2003). Altruism in contemporary America: A report from the National Altruism Study. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
Smith, T. W. (2006). Altruism and empathy in America: Trends and correlates. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
Stark, R., & Glock, C. Y. (1968). American piety: The nature of religious commitment (patterns of religious commitment). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Stürmer, S., Siem, B., Snyder, M., & Kropp, A. (2006). Empathy-motivated helping: The moderating role of group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 943–956.
Taniguchi, H. (2006). Men’s and women’s volunteering: Gender differences in the effects of employment and family characteristics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 83–101.
Taniguchi, H. (2010). Who are volunteers in Japan? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(1), 161–179.
Taniguchi, H., & Thomas, L. (2011). The influences of religious attitudes on volunteering. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(2), 335–355.
Toyoshima, S. (1998). Social stratification and social activities. In K. Katase (Ed.), Political Consciousness in Contemporary Japan (pp. 151–178). Tokyo: The study group of the national survey of social stratification and social mobility in 1995.
Van Tienen, M., Scheepers, P., Reitsma, J., & Schilderman, H. (2011). The role of religiosity for formal and informal volunteering in the Netherlands. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(3), 365–389.
Wilhelm, M. O., & Bekkers, R. (2010). Helping behavior, dispositional empathic concern, and the principle of care. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(1), 11–32.
Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240.
Wilson, J., & Janoski, T. (1995). The contribution of religion to volunteer work. Sociology of Religion, 56(2), 137–152.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997a). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694–713.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997b). Work and volunteering: The long arm of the job. Social Forces, 76(1), 251–272.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1999). Attachment to volunteering. Sociological Forum, 14, 243–272.
Wuthnow, R. (1991). Acts of compassion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Yoshida, H. (1986). Bukkyo to borantarizumu [Buddhism and voluntarism]. In Y. Ogasawara, & N. Hayase (Eds.), Borantiakatsudo no riron 2 [The theory of volunteer activities No. 2] (pp. 59–77). Osaka: Osaka Voluntary Action Center.
Acknowledgments
This study was conducted as a part of the SSP project (http://ssp.hus.osaka-u.ac.jp/). When using the SSP-P2010 data, the author obtained the permission of the SSP project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitani, H. Influences of Resources and Subjective Dispositions on Formal and Informal Volunteering. Voluntas 25, 1022–1040 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9384-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9384-3