New NGO–Elite Relations in Business Development for the Poor in Rural Bangladesh

Original Paper

Abstract

Through observation of two programs in broiler rearing and silk production implemented by a Bangladesh nongovernmental organization (NGO), this article explores what role an NGO can play as an intermediary in business development for the poor with focus on the relations between the NGO and local elites. In theory, as market demand for a product or service increases, the business attracts more interest from local elites, to whom all the benefits tend to go in the end. However, the two cases suggest feasible ways for the poor with intermediary to open up a business opportunity in the elite-controlled rural economy: market differentiation and the use of a stagnant industry. As a result, new NGO–elite relations emerge. Considering the limited life of such relations, efforts should be concentrated on enabling the poor to make the most of the business opportunity in the short term under the new NGO–elite relations.

Keywords

Bangladesh Broiler rearing Silk production Business development Local elites Nongovernmental organizations Poverty reduction 

Résumé

En observant deux programmes, la production d’élevages de poulets et la confection de soie, implémentés par une organisation non gouvernementale (ONG) du Bangladesh, cet article explore quel rôle peut jouer une ONG en tant qu’intermédiaire dans le développement d’une entreprise destinée aux pauvres, en mettant l’accent sur les relations entre l’ONG et les élites locales. En théorie, lorsqu’il y a une augmentation de la demande pour un produit ou un service, l’entreprise attire davantage l’intérêt des élites locales qui finissent par s’accaparer de tous les bénéfices. Cependant, ces deux cas suggèrent la faisabilité pour les démunis avec l’aide d’un intermédiaire dans le but de générer une activité économique dans le cadre d’une économie rurale contrôlée par l’élite : la différenciation du marché et l’utilisation d’une industrie stagnante. Il en résulte que de nouvelles relations entre l’ONG et l’élite s’établissent. En considérant la durée de vie limitée de telles relations, des efforts devraient être faits pour permettre aux plus démunis d’obtenir le plus de leur activité économique dans le court terme sous l’égide des relations entre l’ONG et les élites locales.

Zusammenfassung

Durch Beobachtung von zwei Programmen in Hähnchenaufzucht und Seidenproduktion, die von einer Nichtregierungsorganisation (NRO) in Bangladesch implementiert wurden, erforscht dieser Artikel die mögliche Rolle einer NRO als Mittelsmann in der Entwicklung von Geschäften für Arme, mit Fokus auf die Beziehungen zwischen NRO und lokaler Elite. Theoretisch gesehen, wenn die Marktnachfrage nach einem Produkt oder Service steigt, findet ein Geschäft mehr Beachtung durch die lokale Elite, zu der im Endeffekt häufig aller Nutzen geht. Die beiden Beispiele zeigen mögliche Wege für die Armen, durch einen Mittelsmann eine Geschäftsmöglichkeit in einer von der Elite kontrollierten ländlichen Ökonomie zu erschließen: durch Marktabgrenzung und Nutzung einer stagnierenden Industrie. Als Ergebnis entwickeln sich neue Beziehungen zwischen NRO und Elite. In Anbetracht der begrenzten Lebensdauer solcher Beziehungen sollten sich Bemühungen darauf konzentrieren, die Armen zu befähigen, mittels der neuen NRO-Elite-Beziehungen kurzfristig das meiste aus der Geschäftsmöglichkeit zu machen.

Resumen

Mediante la observación de dos programas de cría de pollos y producción de seda llevados a cabo por una organización no gubernamental (ONG) de Bangladesh, este artículo analiza el papel que pueden desempeñar las ONG como intermediarias en el desarrollo de los negocios de los pobres, centrándose especialmente en las relaciones entre las ONG y las elites locales. En teoría, a medida que aumenta la demanda del mercado por un producto, el negocio atrae un mayor interés de las elites locales, que en última instancia suelen acaparar todos los beneficios. Sin embargo, dos casos sugieren que hay formas viables de lograr que los pobres con intermediarios consigan oportunidades de negocios en la economía rural controlada por las elites: la diferenciación del mercado y el uso de una industria paralizada. El resultado de ello sería la aparición de nuevas relaciones entre las ONG y las elites. Habida cuenta de la duración limitada de estas relaciones, los esfuerzos deberían concentrarse en permitir a los pobres aprovechar al máximo las oportunidades de negocios a corto plazo que proporcionarían las nuevas relaciones entre las ONG y las elites.

摘要

本文通过对孟加拉国非政府组织(NGO)实施的肉鸡饲养和丝绸生产两大计划进行观察分析,探讨了非政府组织(NGO)作为中介机构在促进贫困地区经济发展过程中所发挥的作用,同时重点阐述了非政府组织(NGO)和当地人才之间关系。从理论而言,随着市场对于产品或服务需求的不断增加,企业得以吸引越来越多的当地人才,最终促使所有利益相关方的参与。而这两个实例也进一步揭示了贫困地区借助中介机构打开商机以推广人才型农村经济的可行办法:注重市场差异性与对滞后产业的利用。非政府组织(NGO)与人才之间的新型关系也因此应运而生。考虑到这类关系的生命周期相对较短,故而应重点促使贫困地区在非政府组织(NGO)与人才之间的这种新型关系下,最大限度地在短期内拓展更多的商业机会。

要約

本論文では、バングラデシュ非営利団体(NGO)が実施した蚕座と絹の生産における2つのプログラムを通して、NGOとローカルエリートの関係に焦点を当てつつ貧困者の事業発展においてNGOがどのような仲介者の役割を果たしているかを追及する。理論的には、製品もしくはサービスの増加の需要を求められる市場は最終的に利益を得るローカルエリートにとって魅力的である。しかしながら、市場の分化と停滞産業の利用という2つのケースにおいては、貧困者はエリートによって制御された農村経済におけるビジネスチャンスを仲介者とともに実現できるといえる。その結果として新しいNGOとエリートの関係は出現する。そのような関係における限定的な生活を考慮すると、貧困者は新しいNGOとエリートとの関係を短期間で構築し、ビジネスチャンスを実現する努力が必要である。

ملخص

من خلال مراقبة إثنين من البرامج في تربية و إنتاج الحرير التي تنفذها المنظمات غير حكومية (NGO) في بنجلاديش، يستكشف هذا البحث الدور الذي يمكن أن تلعبه المنظمات غير الحكومية (NGO) بوصفها وسيطاً في تنمية الأعمال التجارية للفقراء مع التركيز على العلاقات بين المنظمات غير الحكومية(NGO) والصفوة المحلية. من الناحية النظرية ، كلما زاد طلب السوق للمنتج أو للخدمة، الأعمال التجارية تجتذب المزيد من الاهتمام من الصفوة المحلية ، الذين تميل كل الفوائد إلى الذهاب إليهم في نهاية المطاف. ومع ذلك ، فإن اثنين من الحالات تشير إلى طرق يمكن تنفيذهما للفقراء مع وسيط لفتح فرصة تجارية في الإقتصاد الريفي الني تسيطر عليه الصفوة: تباين السوق و الركود الصناعي. نتيجة لذلك، علاقات جديدة تنشأ بين المنظمات الغير حكومية(NGO) والصفوة. إذا أخذنا بعين الإعتبار العمر المحدود لهذه العلاقات، ينبغي أن تتركز الجهود على تمكين الفقراء من الاستفادة القصوى من الفرص التجارية في الأجل القصير في إطار جديد للعلاقات الجديدة بين المنظمات الغير حكومية(NGO) والصفوة.

References

  1. Agbeibor Jr., W. (2006). Pro-poor economic growth: Role of small and medium sized enterprises. Journal of Asian Economics, 17(1), 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad, M. M. (2002). NGO field workers in Bangladesh. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmad, Z., & Khanum S. M. (2002). Food security through sustainable income uplift and poverty eradication: The mid-term evaluation report. Report submitted to European Commission, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Google Scholar
  4. Alauddin, M., & Hossain, M. (2001). Environment and agriculture in a developing economy: Problems and prospects for Bangladesh. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Bakht, Z., Latif, M. A., Bhattacharya, D., & Paul, P. (1988). Sericulture industry in Bangladesh: Analysis of production performance, constraints and growth potentials. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
  6. BIDS (Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies) (2003). Evaluation of the Silk Development Project: Final report. BIDS, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  7. BSF (Bangladesh Silk Foundation) (2003). 5 years of Bangladesh Silk Foundation. Dhaka, Bangladesh: BSF.Google Scholar
  8. Caniels, M. C. J., Romijn, H. A., & de Ruijter-De Wildt, M. (2006). Can business development services practitioners learn from theories of innovation and services marketing? Development in Practice, 16(5), 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaudhury, I. A., & Matin, I. (2002). Dimensions and dynamics of microfinance membership overlap—Micro study from Bangladesh. Small Enterprise Development, 13(2), 46–55.Google Scholar
  10. CP Group. (no date). Agribusiness and food industry. www.cpthailand.com/webguest/aboutcp.aspx/. Accessed 13 July 2004.
  11. Dasgupta, A., & Beard, V. A. (2007). Community driven development, collective action and elite capture in Indonesia. Development and Change, 38(2), 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Devine, J. (2006). NGOs, politics and grassroots mobilisation: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of South Asian Development, 1(1), 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Economist Intelligence Unit (2004). Country profile 2004 Bangladesh. London: EIU.Google Scholar
  14. Gauri, V., & Galef, J. (2005). NGOs in Bangladesh: Activities, resources, and governance. World Development, 33(12), 2045–2065.Google Scholar
  15. Ghose, A. K. (1990). Economic growth and employment structure: A study of labour outmigration from agriculture in developing countries. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  16. Gillespie, P., Girgis, M., & Mayer, P. (1996). This great evil: Anticipating political obstacles to development. Public Administration and Development, 16(5), 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halder, S. R. (1999). Viability of sericulture programme of BRAC: Results of a cost–benefit analysis. The Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, 22(2), 99–116.Google Scholar
  18. Harper, M. (1984). Small business in the third world: Guidelines for practical assistance. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Havers, M. (1991). NGOs as agencies for small enterprise development. Small Enterprise Development, 2(3), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hossain, M. (2004). Rural non-farm economy: Evidence from household surveys. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(36), 4053–4058.Google Scholar
  21. Hossain, N., & Moore, M. (2002). Arguing for the poor: Elites and poverty in developing countries. IDS working paper no. 148. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Huque, Q. M. E., Chowdhury, S. A., Haque, M. E., & Sil, B. K. (1999, March). Poultry research in Bangladesh: Present status and its implication for future research. Paper presented at the conference on Poultry as a Tool in Poverty Eradication and Promotion of Gender Equality, Tune Landboskole, Denmark.Google Scholar
  23. IIRD (Institute of Integrated Rural Development) (2001). Socio-economic characteristic of poultry rearer—A case of Dhunot project. Dhaka, Bangladesh: IIRD.Google Scholar
  24. Jeppesen, S. (2005). Enhancing competitiveness and securing equitable development: Can small, micro, and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) do the trick? Development in Practice, 15(3&4), 463–474.Google Scholar
  25. Kindness, H., & Gordon, A. (2001). Agricultural marketing in developing countries: The role of NGOs and CBOs. Policy Series 13. National Resources Institute, Chatham, UK.Google Scholar
  26. Ledgerwood, J. (1999). Microfinance handbook: An institutional and financial perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  27. Mead, D. C., & Liedholm, C. (1998). The dynamics of micro and small enterprises in developing countries. World Development, 26(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer, R. L. (2002). The demand for flexible microfinance products: Lessons from Bangladesh. Journal of International Development, 14(3), 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montgomery, R., Bhattacharya, D., & Hulme, D. (1996). Credit for the poor in Bangladesh: The BRAC rural development programme and the government Thana resource development and employment programme. In D. Hulme & P. Mosley (Eds.), Finance against poverty (Vol. 2, pp. 94–176). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation, Development) (1993). New directions in donor assistance to microenterprises. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  31. Platteau, J. (2004). Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development. Development and Change, 35(2), 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Platteau, J., & Gaspart, F. (2003). The risk of resource misappropriation in community-driven development. World Development, 31(10), 1687–1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Remenyi, J. (2000). Is there a “state of the art” in Microfinance? In J. Remenyi & B. J. Quinones (Eds.), Microfinance and poverty alleviation: Case studies from Asia and the Pacific. London and New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
  34. Riddell, R., & Robinson, M. (1992). The impact of NGO poverty alleviation projects: Results of the case study evaluations. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  35. Saha, S. K. (1996). Marketing strategy of the Rajshahi silk factory: A case study. Journal of the Institute of Bangladesh Studies, 19, 163–187.Google Scholar
  36. Sahley, C. (1995). Strengthening the capacity of NGOs: Cases of small enterprise development agencies in Africa. Oxford: INTRAC.Google Scholar
  37. Sanyal, B. (1991). Antagonistic cooperation: A case study of nongovernmental organizations, government and donors’ relationships in income-generating projects in Bangladesh. World Development, 19(10), 1367–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sinha, S., & Matin, I. (1998). Informal credit transactions of micro-credit borrowers in rural Bangladesh. IDS Bulletin, 29(4), 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stiles, K. (2002). International support for NGOs in Bangladesh: Some unintended consequences. World Development, 30(5), 835–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Swan, S. E. J. (1999, March). The poultry development strategy of the participatory livestock development project in Bangladesh. Paper presented at the conference on Poultry as a Tool in Poverty Eradication and Promotion of Gender Equality, Tune Landboskole, Denmark.Google Scholar
  41. Toufique, K. A. (2001). Sustainable rural livelihoods in Bangladesh. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
  42. Ulvila, M., & Hossain, F. (2002). Development NGOs and political participation of the poor in Bangladesh and Nepal. Voluntas, 13(2), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Schendel, W. (1995). Reviving a rural industry: Silk producers and officials in India and Bangladesh 1880s to 1980s. Dhaka, Bangladesh: University Press.Google Scholar
  44. World Bank (1997). Project appraisal document on a proposed credit in the amount of SDR 8.3 million to the People’s Republic of Bangladesh for a silk development project (No. 16740-BD). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  45. World Bank (2002). Poverty in Bangladesh: Building on progress. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  46. World Bank (2003). Implementation completion report on a credit in the amount of SDR 8.3 million to the People’s Republic of Bangladesh for a silk development pilot project (No. 27415). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  47. Zeller, M., Sharma, M., Ahmed, A. U., & Rashid, S. (2001). Group-based financial institutions for the rural poor in Bangladesh: An institutional- and household-level analysis. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  48. Zohir, S. (2004). NGO sector in Bangladesh: An overview. Economic Political Weekly, 39(36), 4109–4113.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research and The John's Hopkins University 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Integrated Research System for Sustainability ScienceUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations