Skip to main content
Log in

Real-time Classification of Aircrafts Manoeuvers

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whether it be in air defense applications or for air traffic control it is highly desirable to be able to assess in real time the type of aircraft one is dealing with. This task may prove useful when the object refuses to cooperate or to confront the transmitted information with the observed trajectory. In the present paper we advocate an approach based on position (radar) measurements only, for versatility. Besides, we propose to focus on rotation-invariant kinematic trajectory features such as absolute velocity, curvature, torsion and parameters alike, as relevant distinctive features to automatically classify aircraft trajectories in real time. Those features are fed into convolutional neural networks that are state of the art for time series classification. Notably they seamlessly handle trajectories of variable length and hence may be used in real time. The constructed classifiers are trained with real data collected from publicly available information transmitted by the aircrafts. This allows for benchmarking of the proposed learning algorithms, as well as discussion on the best possible achievable accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Zyweck, A., & Bogner, R. E. (1996). Radar target classification of commercial aircraft. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 32(2), 598–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan, W., Zhu, Z., & Hu, R. (1997). A hybrid genetic/bp algorithm and its application for radar target classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE 1997 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. NAECON 1997 (vol. 2, pp. 981–984). IEEE.

  3. Lei, J., & Lu, C. (2005). Target classification based on micro-doppler signatures. In IEEE International Radar Conference, 2005 (pp. 179–183). IEEE.

  4. Molchanov, P., Egiazarian, K., Astola, J., Totsky, A., Leshchenko, S., & Jarabo-Amores, M. P. (2014). Classification of aircraft using micro-doppler bicoherence-based features. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 50(2), 1455–1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pierucci, L., & Bocchi, L. (2007). Improvements of radar clutter classification in air traffic control environment. In IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (pp. 721–724). IEEE.

  6. Thiagarajan, J. J., Ramamurthy, K. N., Knee, P., Spanias, A., & Berisha, V. (2010). Sparse representations for automatic target classification in SAR images. In 4th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (ISCCSP) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.

  7. Chen, S., Wang, H., Xu, F., & Jin, Y.-Q. (2016). Target classification using the deep convolutional networks for SAR images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(8), 4806–4817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nasrabadi, N. M. (2019). Deeptarget: An automatic target recognition using deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 55(6), 2687–2697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghadaki, H., & Dizaji, R. (2006). Target track classification for airport surveillance radar (ASR). In IEEE Conference on Radar (p. 4). IEEE.

  10. Dizaji, R., & Ghadaki, H. (2006). Classification system for radar and sonar applications. 7567203B2.

  11. Mohajerin, N., Histon, J., Dizaji, R., & Waslander, S. L. (2014). Feature extraction and radar track classification for detecting UAVS in civillian airspace. In 2014 IEEE Radar Conference (pp. 0674–0679). IEEE.

  12. Wang, Z., Yan, W., & Oates, T. (2017). Time series classification from scratch with deep neural networks: A strong baseline. In 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1578–1585). IEEE.

  13. Fawaz, H. I., Forestier, G., Weber, J., Idoumghar, L., & Muller, P.-A. (2019). Deep learning for time series classification: A review. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 33(4), 917–963.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Nabaa, N., & Bishop, R. H. (2000). Validation and comparison of coordinated turn aircraft maneuver models. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 36(1), 250–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chopin, P., Barbaresco, F., & Jouaber, S. Device for identifying a type of aircraft, associated identification method and computer program. EP 3 722 830 A1, 2020-10-14

  16. ADS-B Exchange platform. www.adsbexchange.com. Retrieved 2 January 2021.

  17. Jeong, Y.-S., Jeong, M. K., & Omitaomu, O. A. (2011). Weighted dynamic time warping for time series classification. Pattern Recognition, 44(9), 2231–2240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ratanamahatana, C. A., & Keogh, E. (2004). Making time-series classification more accurate using learned constraints. In Proceedings of the 2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 11–22). SIAM.

  19. Xi, X., Keogh, E., Shelton, C., Wei, L., & Ratanamahatana, C. A. (2006). Fast time series classification using numerosity reduction. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1033–1040).

  20. Tanisaro, P., & Heidemann, G. (2016). Time series classification using time warping invariant echo state networks. In 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) (pp. 831–836). IEEE.

  21. Le Guennec, A., Malinowski, S., & Tavenard, R. (2016). Data augmentation for time series classification using convolutional neural networks. In ECML/PKDD Workshop on Advanced Analytics and Learning on Temporal Data.

  22. Zhao, B., Lu, H., Chen, S., Liu, J., & Wu, D. (2017). Convolutional neural networks for time series classification. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 28(1), 162–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cui, Z., Chen, W., & Chen, Y. (2016). Multi-scale convolutional neural networks for time series classification. Preprint retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.06995

  24. Zheng, Y., Liu, Q., Chen, E., Ge, Y., & Zhao, J. L. (2014). Time series classification using multi-channels deep convolutional neural networks. In International Conference on Web-Age Information Management (pp. 298–310). Springer.

  25. Serrà, J., Pascual, S., & Karatzoglou, A. (2018). Towards a universal neural network encoder for time series. In CCIA (pp. 120–129).

  26. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 448–456). PMLR.

  28. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 770–778).

  29. Zeiler, M. D. (2012). Adadelta: An adaptive learning rate method. Preprint retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5701

  30. Pilté, M., Bonnabel, S., & Barbaresco, F. (2017). Tracking the Frenet-Serret frame associated to a highly maneuvering target in 3D. In 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (pp. 1969–1974). IEEE.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank THALES LAS and especially Frederic Barbaresco and Philippe Chopin, but also the Mathematics Foundation Jacques Hadamard (PGMO project) for their involvement in this project.

Funding

The research leading to these results received funding from Mathematics Foundation Jacques Hadamard (PGMO project) and the French Directorate General of Armaments (DGA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, S.J., S.V-F, S.B. and M.P.; Data curation, S.J.; Funding acquisition, S.V-F, S.B. and J.A; Methodology, S.J., S.B., S.V-F., and J.A.; Writing - original draft preparation, S.J.; Writing - review and editing, S.J., S.V-F. and S.B.; Resources, S.V-F., M.P.; Supervision, S.V-F., M.P., S.B.; Visualization, S.J.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jouaber Sami.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sami, J., Silvère, B., Santiago, VF. et al. Real-time Classification of Aircrafts Manoeuvers. J Sign Process Syst 95, 425–434 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-022-01823-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-022-01823-x

Keywords

Navigation