Advertisement

Cross-Domain Image Matching with Deep Feature Maps

  • Bailey KongEmail author
  • James Supanc̆ic̆III
  • Deva Ramanan
  • Charless C. Fowlkes
Article
  • 190 Downloads

Abstract

We investigate the problem of automatically determining what type of shoe left an impression found at a crime scene. This recognition problem is made difficult by the variability in types of crime scene evidence (ranging from traces of dust or oil on hard surfaces to impressions made in soil) and the lack of comprehensive databases of shoe outsole tread patterns. We find that mid-level features extracted by pre-trained convolutional neural nets are surprisingly effective descriptors for this specialized domains. However, the choice of similarity measure for matching exemplars to a query image is essential to good performance. For matching multi-channel deep features, we propose the use of multi-channel normalized cross-correlation and analyze its effectiveness. Our proposed metric significantly improves performance in matching crime scene shoeprints to laboratory test impressions. We also show its effectiveness in other cross-domain image retrieval problems: matching facade images to segmentation labels and aerial photos to map images. Finally, we introduce a discriminatively trained variant and fine-tune our system through our proposed metric, obtaining state-of-the-art performance.

Keywords

Normalized cross-correlation Similarity metric Cross-domain image matching 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Sarena Wiesner and Yaron Shor for providing access to their dataset. This work was partially funded by the Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence (CSAFE) through NIST Cooperative Agreement #70NANB15H176.

References

  1. Bodziak, W. J. (1999). Footwear impression evidence: Detection, recovery and examination. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, T., Cheng, M. M., Tan, P., Shamir, A., & Hu, S. M. (2009). Sketch2photo: Internet image montage. In ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) (Vol. 28). ACM.Google Scholar
  3. Costea, D., & Leordeanu, M. (2016). Aerial image geolocalization from recognition and matching of roads and intersections. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.08323.
  4. Dardi, F., Cervelli, F., & Carrato, S. (2009). A texture based shoe retrieval system for shoe marks of real crime scenes. Image Analysis and Processing-ICIAP, 2009, 384–393.Google Scholar
  5. De Chazal, P., Flynn, J., & Reilly, R. B. (2005). Automated processing of shoeprint images based on the Fourier transform for use in forensic science. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(3), 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Divecha, M., & Newsam, S. (2016). Large-scale geolocalization of overhead imagery. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, ACM.Google Scholar
  7. Fisher, R. B., & Oliver, P. (1995). Multi-variate cross-correlation and image matching. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC).Google Scholar
  8. Geiss, S., Einax, J., & Danzer, K. (1991). Multivariate correlation analysis and its application in environmental analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta, 242, 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gueham, M., Bouridane, A., & Crookes, D. (2008). Automatic recognition of partial shoeprints using a correlation filter classifier. In International machine vision and image processing conference, 2008. IMVIP’08 (pp. 37–42).Google Scholar
  10. Hariharan, B., Malik, J., & Ramanan, D. (2012). Discriminative decorrelation for clustering and classification. Computer Vision-ECCV, 2012, 459–472.Google Scholar
  11. Isola, P., Zhu, J. Y., Zhou, T., & Efros, A. A. (2017). Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.Google Scholar
  12. Kong, B., Supancic, J. S., Ramanan, D., & Fowlkes, C. C. (2017). Cross-domain forensic shoeprint matching. In British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC).Google Scholar
  13. Kortylewski, A. (2017). Model-based image analysis for forensic shoe print recognition. Ph.D. thesis, University\_of\_Basel.Google Scholar
  14. Kortylewski, A., & Vetter, T. (2016). Probabilistic compositional active basis models for robust pattern recognition. In British machine vision conference.Google Scholar
  15. Kortylewski, A., Albrecht, T., & Vetter, T. (2014). Unsupervised footwear impression analysis and retrieval from crime scene data. In Asian conference on computer vision (pp. 644–658). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, H. C., Ramotowski, R., & Gaensslen, R. (2001). Advances in fingerprint technology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, F. F., Fergus, R., & Perona, P. (2006). One-shot learning of object categories. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(4), 594–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malisiewicz, T., Gupta, A., & Efros, A. A. (2011). Ensemble of exemplar-SVMs for object detection and beyond. In 2011 IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV) (pp. 89–96).Google Scholar
  19. Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., & Bibby, J. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis (probability and mathematical statistics). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Martin, N., & Maes, H. (1979). Multivariate analysis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Parkhi, O. M., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A. (2015). Deep face recognition. In BMVC (Vol. 1).Google Scholar
  22. Patil, P. M., & Kulkarni, J. V. (2009). Rotation and intensity invariant shoeprint matching using gabor transform with application to forensic science. Pattern Recognition, 42(7), 1308–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pavlou, M., & Allinson, N. (2006). Automatic extraction and classification of footwear patterns. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning-IDEAL, 2006, 721–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Popper Shaffer, J., & Gillo, M. W. (1974). A multivariate extension of the correlation ratio. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(3), 521–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Radim Tyleček, R.Š. (2013). Spatial pattern templates for recognition of objects with regular structure. In Proceedings of the GCPR, Saarbrucken, Germany.Google Scholar
  26. Richetelli, N., Lee, M. C., Lasky, C. A., Gump, M. E., & Speir, J. A. (2017). Classification of footwear outsole patterns using fourier transform and local interest points. Forensic Science International, 275, 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Russell, B. C., Sivic, J., Ponce, J., & Dessales, H. (2011). Automatic alignment of paintings and photographs depicting a 3D scene. In 2011 IEEE international conference on computer vision workshops (ICCV workshops) (pp. 545–552).Google Scholar
  28. Senlet, T., El-Gaaly, T., & Elgammal, A. (2014). Hierarchical semantic hashing: Visual localization from buildings on maps. In 2014 22nd international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR) (pp. 2990–2995).Google Scholar
  29. Sharif Razavian, A., Azizpour, H., Sullivan, J., & Carlsson, S. (2014). CNN features off-the-shelf: An astounding baseline for recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops (pp. 806–813).Google Scholar
  30. Shrivastava, A., Malisiewicz, T., Gupta, A., & Efros, A. A. (2011). Data-driven visual similarity for cross-domain image matching. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 30(6), 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tang, Y., Srihari, S. N., Kasiviswanathan, H., & Corso, J. J. (2010). Footwear print retrieval system for real crime scene marks. In International workshop on computational forensics (pp. 88–100). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Wei, C. H., & Gwo, C. Y. (2014). Alignment of core point for shoeprint analysis and retrieval. In 2014 international conference on information science, electronics and electrical engineering (ISEEE) (Vol. 2, pp. 1069–1072).Google Scholar
  33. Xiao, T., Li, H., Ouyang, W., & Wang, X. (2016). Learning deep feature representations with domain guided dropout for person re-identification. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 1249–1258).Google Scholar
  34. Yekutieli, Y., Shor, Y., Wiesner, S., & Tsach, T. (2012). Expert assisting computerized system for evaluating the degree of certainty in 2D shoeprints. Technical report, Technical Report, TP-3211, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  35. Zagoruyko, S., & Komodakis, N. (2015). Learning to compare image patches via convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 4353–4361).Google Scholar
  36. Zbontar, J., & LeCun, Y. (2015). Computing the stereo matching cost with a convolutional neural network. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 1592–1599).Google Scholar
  37. Zhang, L., & Allinson, N. (2005). Automatic shoeprint retrieval system for use in forensic investigations. In UK workshop on computational intelligence.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA
  2. 2.Robotics InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations