Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of fungi in the airways of horses according to the sample site: a methodological study

  • Research
  • Published:
Veterinary Research Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fungal detection in equine airways may be performed on either tracheal wash (TW) or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) by either cytology or culture. However, method comparisons are sparse. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of fungi in airways of horses according to the sample site and laboratory methodology. Sixty-two adult horses, investigated in the field or referred for respiratory disease, were included. Tracheal wash, and BALF collected separately from both lungs, were collected using a videoendoscope. Fungi were detected in cytologic samples examined by light microscopy, and by fungal culture. Hay was sampled in the field. Prevalence of fungi was of 91.9% in TW and 37.1% in BALF. Fungi were cultured from 82.3% of TW and 20.9% of BALF. Fungal elements were observed cytologically in 69.4% of TW and 22.6% of BALF. In 50% of horses, the same fungi were detected in both TW and hay, but fungi detected in BALF and hay differed in all horses. Poor agreement was found for the detection of fungi between TW and BALF and between fungal culture and cytologic examination (Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) < 0.20). Moderate agreement was found between cytologic examination of left and right lungs (κ = 0.47). The prevalence of fungi detected cytologically on pooled BALF was significantly different (p = 0.023) than on combined left and right BALF. Fungi were more prevalent in the TW than BALF, and results suggest that hay might not be the primary source of fungi of the lower respiratory tract of horses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Preliminary results were presented to the ECEIM Virtual Congress 2021 (poster with oral communication, November 2021), the 11th ICEEP (poster, Uppsala, June 2022) and the BEVA Congress 2022 (oral presentation, Liverpool, September 2022).

Funding

Financial support was provided by the IFCE (French Institute for Horses and Equestrians), Fonds EPERON, LABÉO and CISCO-Oniris.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L. Lemonnier contributed to study design, data collection and study execution, data analysis and interpretation, and preparation of the manuscript. A. Couroucé contributed to study design, data collection and study execution, data analysis and interpretation and preparation of the manuscript. M. Cessans, P. Barbazanges and M.-P. Toquet contributed to data collection, study execution and data analysis. L. Petit contributed to data analysis. J.M. Cardwell contributed to study design and preparation of the manuscript. E.A. Richard contributed to study design, data analysis and interpretation, and preparation of the manuscript. All authors gave their final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. C. Lemonnier.

Ethics declarations

Statement of animal ethics

The study was approved by the regional Ethic Committee for Clinical and Epidemiological Veterinary Research (CERVO-2020-3-V). A consent form was also signed by the owner.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the regional Ethic Committee for Clinical and Epidemiological Veterinary Research (CERVO-2020-3-V).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 29.7 KB)

ESM 2

(PDF 25.2 KB)

ESM 3

(PDF 251 KB)

ESM 4

(PDF 95.7 KB)

ESM 5

(PDF 48.6 KB )

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lemonnier, L.C., Couroucé, A., Cessans, M. et al. Detection of fungi in the airways of horses according to the sample site: a methodological study. Vet Res Commun 48, 345–355 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-023-10213-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-023-10213-y

Keywords

Navigation