Skip to main content
Log in

Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Veterinary Research Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus. In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in R. sanguineus, which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing Leishmania spp. in R. sanguineus, thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TRSD: original draft, formal analysis, validation, visualisation; MAV: data curation, investigation, methodology; VMFL: methodology, validation, writing—review and editing; BCMO: data curation, investigation, methodology; LVS: data curation, investigation, methodology; AJC: supervision, writing—review and editing; JFG: validation, writing—review and editing; KDSB: conceptualisation, project administration, resources, funding acquisition, supervision, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thaís Rabelo Santos-Doni.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• The gold standard in diagnostics tests of Leishmania spp. in ticks was intestine IHC.

• The best tissue for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node.

• The intestine was the best tissue for Leishmania diagnosis in ticks.

• There was strong agreement between IHC and RT-PCR for ticks.

• Intestine IHC in ticks showed almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santos-Doni, T.R., Viol, M.A., Lima, V.M.F. et al. Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques. Vet Res Commun 46, 109–120 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y

Keywords

Navigation