Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety Risks for Animals Fed Genetic Modified (GM) Plants

  • Published:
Veterinary Research Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

GM plants are widely grown all over the world, but many constraints still tend to discourage their use in Europe. Potential risks suggested to be associated with the use of GM are unexpected gene effects, allergenic potential, antibiotic resistance, gene flow. GM feed safety is presently evaluated by adopting the concept of GM substantial equivalence, by comparison with non-GM isogenic crops. Comparison is based on a wide spectrum of chemical components and on livestock performance. From the available experimental data, currently utilized GM plants appear safe and show no effects on animals or animal products. Hence, although they potentially exist, safety risks caused by the use of GM plants appear to be so low as be negligible in comparison with their potential benefits, if appropriately designed. GM plants represent a valuable option for future breeding, to increase yield while reducing the use of pesticides, improve plant adaptation to unfavourable environments, and produce better quality crops, also from a nutritional point of view. Nonetheless, GM crops are novel foods and the assessment of their safety using a scientific sound approach seems essential to protect the environment, as well as the health of humans and livestock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aumaitre, L.A., 2004. Safety assessment and feeding value for pigs, poultry and ruminant animals of pest protected (Bt) plants and herbicide tolerant (glyphosate, glufosinate) plants: Interpretation of experimental results observed worldwide on GM plants.Italian Journal of Animal Science, 3, 107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrière, Y., Vérité, R., Brunschwig, P., Surault, F. and Emile, J.C., 2001. Feeding value of corn silage estimated with sheep and dairy cows is not altered by genetic incorporation of Bt176 resistance to Ostrina nubilais.Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 1863–1871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, A.R., Gallardo, M.R., Maciel, M., Giordano, J.M., Conti, G.A., Gaggiotti, M.C., Quaino, O., Gianni, C. and Hartnell, G.F., 2004. Effects of feeding rations with genetically modified whole cottonseed to lactating Holstein cows.Journal of Diary Science, 87, 1778–1785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chassy, B.M., 2002. Food safety evaluation of crops produced through biotechnology.Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 21(3), 166S–173S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, A.C., 2001. Addressing the safety of GM food crops, food safety and food quality.Issues in Environmental Science and Technology.

  • Chowdhury, E.H., Kuribara, H., Hino, A., Sultana, P., Mikami, O., Shimada, N., Guruge, K.S., Saito, M. and Nakajima, Y., 2003. Detection of corn intrinsic and recombinant DNA fragments and Cry1Ab protein in the gastrointestinal content of pigs fed genetically modified corn Bt11.Journal of Animal Science, 81, 2546–2551

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.H. and Ipharraguerre, I.R., 2001. Livestock performance: Feeding biotech crops.Journal of Dairy Science, 84(E. Suppl.), E9–E18

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities, 1997. Commission recommendation of 29 July 1997 concerning the scientific aspects and the presentation of information necessary to support applications for the placing on the market of novel foods and novel food ingredients and the preparation of initial assessment reports under Regulation (EC) No. 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council. C(97) 2634 final.Official Journal of the European Communities, 40, L253/1-45

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, P.J., 2001. Environmental impact of biotech crops.Journal of Animal Science, 79(E. Suppl.), E144–E147

    Google Scholar 

  • Einspanier, R., Klots, A., Kraft, J., Aulrich, K., Poser, R., Schwägele, F., Jahreis, G. and Flachowsky, G., 2001. The fate of forage plant DNA in farm animals: A collaborative case-study investigation cattle and chicken fed recombinant plant material.European Food Research and Technology, 212, 129–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, M.A., 2002. New feeds from genetically modified plants: The US approach to safety for animals and the food chain.Livestock Production Science, 74, 239–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flachowsky, G., Aulrich, K., Böhme, H. and Daenicke, R., 2000. GMO in animal nutrition—Results of experiments at our institute. In:Proceedings of the 6th International Feed Production Conference, Piacenza, 27–28 November 2000, pp. 291–307

  • Food and Agriculture Organization, 2000. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on foods derived from biotechnology. FAO, Rome

  • Hodges, J., 2000. Editorial: Polarization on genetically modified food.Livestock Production Science, 63, 159–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, D.A., Elmadfa, I., Engel, K.H., Heller, K.J., Kozianowski, G., Köning, A., Müller, D., Narbonne, J.F., Wackernagel, W. and Kleiner, J., 2001. Safety considerations of DNA in food.Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 45, 235–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J.C., Kolwyck, D.C., Kays, S.B., Whetsell, A.J., Suber, J.B., Cromwell, G.L., Lirette, R.P. and Glenn, K.C., 2003. Determining whether transgenic and endogenous plant DNA and transgenic protein are detectable in muscle from swine fed Roundup Ready soybean meal.Journal of Animal Science, 81, 1447–1455

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, H.A., Kok, E.J. and Noteborn, H.P.J.M., 2000. Profiling techniques to identify differences between foods derived from biotechnology and their counterparts. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on foods derived from biotechnology. FAO, Rome, pp. 2–12

  • ILSI, 2003. The safety assessment of novel foods and concepts to determine their safety in use. Expert Group Report Reviews at a Workshop held in November 2002. Organised by the ILSI Europe Novel Food Task Force

  • Phipps, R.H., Deaville, E.R. and Maddison, B.C., 2003. Detection of transgenic and endogenous plant DNA in rumen fluid, duodenal digesta, milk, blood, and faeces of lactating dairy cows.Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 4070–4078

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, I.R., 2002. Genetically modified foods, science, consumers and the media.Proceeding of the Nutrition Society, 61, 25–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Bertoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bertoni, G., Marsan, P.A. Safety Risks for Animals Fed Genetic Modified (GM) Plants. Vet Res Commun 29 (Suppl 2), 13–18 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-005-0004-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-005-0004-6

Keywords

Navigation