Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Photosynthesis and shoot allocation of amur honeysuckle and two native shrubs in deep shade

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aside from the larger question of which traits make introduced species invasive, there is the practical concern of understanding the ecology of established invasives. An ecological understanding of invaders allows us to better identify invasible habitats and know the advantages and disadvantages an invader holds in relation to natives. This gives insights on how the invader will interact with natives, and how it might fare over time. Throughout eastern North America Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Maxim) is a notorious invader of forests and forest edges. The species inflicts harm on individual species, communities, and ecosystem functions. Lonicera appears in forests across a continuum of light conditions. It possesses considerable shade tolerance, although the extent and nature of this trait has been rarely contrasted with native species. Lonicera appears to be less abundant and slower growing under the closed canopy of the forest interior. Forests on mesic sites, especially those with closed sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marshall.) canopies or dense subcanopies have especially dim understories, perhaps posing a significant limitation on carbon gain in Lonicera. I compared the photosynthetic responses, leaf characteristics, and leaf area ratios (LAR) of Lonicera to two shade tolerant native understory shrubs, Asimina triloba Adans. (pawpaw) and Lindera benzoin Thunb. (spicebush). Lonicera had comparable light responses measured on a leaf area basis, but mass-based measurements show it is less efficient paying back carbon invested in leaf tissue. This arises because Lonicera does not adjust specific leaf mass downward to the level of Asimina and Lindera in deep shade. LAR is distinctly higher in Asimina and Lindera, suggesting higher rates of carbon gain in the native species. Because photosynthesis is only one of many other physiological, demographic, and community-level processes in play, we should not necessarily assume lesser success for Lonicera in deep shade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data are available from the author.

References

Download references

Funding

Gas analyzer calibration and maintenance were supported by a Seed Grant for Transitional and Exploratory Projects awarded to Kurt Schulz by the Graduate School of Southern Illinois University Edwardsville.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Kurt Schulz wrote the main manuscript and prepared all figures and tables. KS conceived the project, collected, and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. Special thanks to Anh Nguyen (Southern Illinois University Edwardsville) for considerable assistance with field data collection.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt E. Schulz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Communicated by Norris Muth.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schulz, K.E. Photosynthesis and shoot allocation of amur honeysuckle and two native shrubs in deep shade. Plant Ecol 224, 921–930 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01347-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-023-01347-9

Keywords

Navigation