Abstract
Investigation of relationships between biomass of different plant compartments is important because their varying turnover rates affect the amount and composition of aboveground and belowground litter, which has a direct effect on nutrient cycling and carbon accumulation in soil. A study of biomass partitioning amongst compartments of the bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.), a common clonal dwarf shrub in boreal coniferous forests, was carried out at eleven study sites in Finland. We hypothesize that the biomass partitioning of bilberry follows a common pattern across a variety of edaphic conditions and geographic range, and this pattern can be modelled by the rank distribution of compartment biomasses. We found that the highest portion of the total biomass belonged to rhizomes, which were followed by shoot stems, roots and leaves. Furthermore, this pattern was observed regardless of the latitudinal zone (northern or southern Finland), site fertility level measured as soil C/N ratio and canopy-dominant tree species (pine or spruce). However, the observed ratios between biomass compartments varied between different sites. In particular, we found that the exact ratio between above- and belowground biomass was dependent on the C/N ratio of the soil organic layer (exponential model, R2 = 0.443), showing that bilberry allocates more biomass to belowground parts in the nutrient poor than in the nutrient-rich sites. The results suggested that there are uniform regularities in the structural organization within the plant species representing clonal growth form of dwarf shrubs. This observation enables us to use the rank distribution of compartments in modelling biomass partitioning of bilberry in a wide range of environmental conditions, although the mechanisms underlying such regularities require further investigation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data used in the study are stored in the Luke’s ICP Forests database and are available from Luke’s authors by reasonable request.
Code availability
Available from authors by reasonable request.
References
Balandina TP, Vakhrameyeva MG (1980) Chernika Obyknovennaya. Biologicheskaya Flora Moskovskoy Oblasti 6:132–145 (in Russian)
Bobbink R, Hicks K, Galloway J, Spranger T, Alkemade R, Ashmore M, De Vries W (2010) Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 20(1):30–59. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1140.1
Bobkova KS (1987) Biologicheskaya produktivnost’ hvojnyh lesov evropejskogo Severo-Vostoka. Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian)
Boulanger-Lapointe N, Järvinen A, Partanen R, Herrmann TM (2017) Climate and herbivore influence on Vaccinium myrtillus over the last 40 years in northwest Lapland. Finland. Ecosphere 8(1):e01654. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1654
Cajander AK (1949) Forest types and their significance. Acta Forestalia Fennica 56:1–71. https://doi.org/10.14214/aff.7396
Ding Y, Leppälammi-Kujansuu J, Helmisaari HS (2019) Fine root longevity and below- and aboveground litter production in a boreal Betula pendula forest. Forest Ecol Manag 431:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.039
Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ (2002) Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science 295(5559):1517–1520. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1066360
Ernst MD (2004) Permutation methods: a basis for exact inference. Stat Sci 19(4):676–685. https://doi.org/10.1214/088342304000000396
Flower-Ellis JGK (1971) Age structure and dynamics in stands of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.). Stockholm Rapporter, vol 9. Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm
Frolov P, Shanin V, Zubkova E, Bykhovets S, Grabarnik P (2020) CAMPUS-S—the model of ground layer vegetation populations in forest ecosystems and their contribution to the dynamics of carbon and nitrogen. I. Problem formulation and description of the model. Ecol Model 431:109184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109184
Frolov P, Zubkova E, Shanin V, Bykhovets S, Mäkipää R, Salemaa M (2020) CAMPUS-S – The model of ground layer vegetation populations in forest ecosystems and their contribution to the dynamics of carbon and nitrogen. II. Parameterization, validation and simulation experiments. Ecol Model 431:109183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109183
Gerdol R, Anfodillo T, Gualmini M, Cannone N, Bragazza L, Brancaleoni L (2004) Biomass distribution of two subalpine dwarf-shrubs in relation to soil moisture and nutrient content. J Veg Sci 15(4):457–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02284.x
Glass VM, Percival DC, Proctor JTA (2005) Tolerance of lowbush blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) to drought stress. I. Soil water and yield component analysis. Can J Plant Sci 85(4):911–917. https://doi.org/10.4141/P03-028
Grelet GA, Alexander IJ, Proe MF, Frossard JS, Millard P (2001) Leaf habit influences nitrogen remobilization in Vaccinium species. J Exp Bot 52(358):993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.358.993
Hättenschwiler S, Gasser P (2005) Soil animals alter plant litter diversity effects on decomposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102(5):1519–1524. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404977102
Heath GH, Luckwill LC, Pullen OJ (1938) The rooting systems of heath plants. The Journal of Ecology 6(2):331–352. https://doi.org/10.2307/2256252
Helmisaari HS, Hallbäcken L (1999) Fine-root biomass and necromass in limed and fertilized Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stands. Forest Ecol Manag 119(1–3):99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00514-3
Hendricks JJ, Nadelhoffer KJ, Aber JD (1993) Assessing the role of fine roots in carbon and nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 8(5):174–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(93)90143-D
Hilli S, Stark S, Derome J (2008) Water-extractable organic compounds in different components of the litter layer of boreal coniferous forest soils along a climatic gradient. Boreal. Environ. Res. 13:92–106
Hu M, Lehtonen A, Minunno F, Mäkelä A (2020) Age effect on tree structure and biomass allocation in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Ann For Sci 77(3):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00988-4
Ingestad T (1973) Mineral nutrient requirements of Vaccinium vitis-idaea and V. myrtillus. Physiol. Plantarum. 29(2):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1973.tb03099.x
Komarov AS, Ginzhul LK, Shanin VN, Bykhovets SS, Bobkova KS, Kuznetsov MA, Osipov AF (2017) Pattern of biomass partitioning into fractions of boreal trees. Biology Bull 44(6):626–633. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359017060061
Komarov, A., Zubkova, E., Salemaa, M., and Mäkipää, R. (2013). Rank distributions and biomass partitioning of plants. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Functional-Structural Plant Models Saariselkä, Finland, 9–14 June 2013. METLA (pp. 67–69).
Komarov, A., Frolov, P., Zubkova, E., Salemaa, M., and Mäkipää, R. (2015). A model of population dynamics of dwarf shrubs. In Towards a new era of forest science in the boreal region: abstracts of the 17th IBFRA conference May 24–29, 2015, Rovaniemi, Finland/Raisa Mäkipää and Tuire Kilponen (eds.). Luonnonvarakeskus (Luke) (p. 73).
Komarov A., Grabarnik P., Shanin V., Frolov P., Bykhovets S., Zubkova E., … and Mäkipää R. (2016) The model of plant biomass partitioning based on rank distributions. In IEEE International Conference on Functional-Structural Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications. Qingdao, China, 7–11 Nov, 2016. (p. 17).
Lehnebach R, Beyer R, Letort V, Heuret P (2018) The pipe model theory half a century on: a review. Ann Bot-London 121(5):773–795. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx194
Lehtonen A, Mäkipää R, Heikkinen J, Sievänen R, Liski J (2004) Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. Forest Ecol Manag 188(1–3):211–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.008
Lehtonen A, Linkosalo T, Peltoniemi M, Sievänen R, Mäkipää R, Tamminen P, Komarov A (2016) Forest soil carbon stock estimates in a nationwide inventory: evaluating performance of the ROMULv and Yasso07 models in Finland. Geosci Model Dev 9(11):4169–4183. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4169-2016
Leppälammi-Kujansuu J, Aro L, Salemaa M, Hansson K, Kleja DB, Helmisaari HS (2014) Fine root longevity and carbon input into soil from below-and aboveground litter in climatically contrasting forests. Forest Ecol Manag 326:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.03.039
Liski J, Lehtonen A, Palosuo T, Peltoniemi M, Eggers T, Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R (2006) Carbon accumulation in Finland’s forests 1922–2004 – an estimate obtained by combination of forest inventory data with modelling of biomass, litter and soil. Ann for Sci 63(7):687–697. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006049
Lortie CJ, Aarssen LW (2000) A test of the reserve meristem hypothesis using Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 87(12):1789–1792. https://doi.org/10.2307/2656830
Mäkelä A, Valentine HT, Helmisaari HS (2008) Optimal co-allocation of carbon and nitrogen in a forest stand at steady state. New Phytol 180(1):114–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02558.x
Mäkipää R (1999) Response patterns of Vaccinium myrtillus and V. vitis-idaea along nutrient gradients in boreal forest. J Veg Sci. 10(1):17–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/3237156
Maznaya, E. A., and Lyanguzova, I. V. (2010). Ekologo-populyatsionnyy monitoring yagodnykh kustarnichkov pri aerotekhnogennom zagryaznenii. SPb.: VVM, 1, 95. (In Russian).
Merilä, P. and Jortikka, S. (eds.) 2013. Forest Condition Monitoring in Finland – National report. The Finnish Forest Research Institute. [Online report]. Available at http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:metla-201305087568 [Accessed 2021–02–18].
Miina J, Hotanen JP, Salo K (2009) Modelling the abundance and temporal variation in the production of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) in Finnish mineral soil forests. Silva Fennica 43:577–593. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.181
Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R (2006) Biomass equations for European trees: addendum. Silva Fenn. 40(4):475. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.475
Newman ME (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp Phys 46(5):323–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510500052444
Niklas KJ (2005) Modelling below-and above-ground biomass for non-woody and woody plants. Ann Bot-London 95(2):315–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci028
Nygaard RT (1975) Acclimatization effect in photosynthesis and respiration. In: Wielgolaski FE (ed) Fennoscandian Tundra Ecosystems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 163–167
Petersson H, Holm S, Ståhl G, Alger D, Fridman J, Lehtonen A, Mäkipää R (2012) Individual tree biomass equations or biomass expansion factors for assessment of carbon stock changes in living biomass—A comparative study. Forest Ecol Manag 270:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.004
Pohjanmies T, Genikova N, Hotanen JP, Ilvesniemi H, Kryshen A, Moshnikov S, Merilä P (2020) Site types revisited: Comparison of traditional Russian and Finnish classification systems for European boreal forests. Appl. Veg. Sci. 24(1):e12525. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12525
R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Repola J (2009) Biomass equations for Scots pine and Norway spruce in Finland. Silva Fenn. 43(4):625–647. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.184
Salemaa M, Derome J, Nöjd P (2008) Response of boreal forest vegetation to the fertility status of the organic layer along a climatic gradient. Boreal. Environ. Res. 13(48):48–66
Serebryakov, I. G. (1962). Ekologicheskaya morfologiya rasteniy: Zhiznennyye formy pokrytosemennykh i khvoynykh: Uchebnoye posobiye. Vysshaya shkola. (In Russian).
Shutov, V. V. Struktura, dinamika i plodonosheniye populyatsiy kustarnichkovykh rasteniy: dis. d–ra biol. nauk: Kostroma: KGTU, 2001. 322. (In Russian).
Somogyi Z, Cienciala E, Mäkipää R, Muukkonen P, Lehtonen A, Weiss P (2007) Indirect methods of large-scale forest biomass estimation. Eur J for Res 126(2):197–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0125-7
Stueffer JF, De Kroon H, During HJ (1996) Exploitation of environmental hetergeneity by spatial division of labor in a clonal plant. Funct Ecol. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390280
Sukhovolsky VG (1996) Fraktsionnaya struktura i produktivnost’ fitomassy derev’yev i nasazhdeniy. Lesovedeniye 1:30–40 (in Russian)
Sun K, McCormack ML, Li L, Ma Z, Guo D (2016) Fast-cycling unit of root turnover in perennial herbaceous plants in a cold temperate ecosystem. Sci Rep-UK 6(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19698
Tolvanen A (1994) Differences in recovery between a deciduous and an evergreen ericaceous clonal dwarf shrub after simulated aboveground herbivory and belowground damage. Can J Botany 72(6):853–859. https://doi.org/10.1139/b94-110
Tolvanen A, Laine K, Pakonen T, Saari E, Havas P (1993) Effect of habitat and time of clipping on the recovery of the bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus). Annal Bot Fenni 30:15–20
Tonteri T, Salemaa M, Rautio P, Hallikainen V, Korpela L, Merilä P (2016) Forest management regulates temporal change in the cover of boreal plant species. Forest Ecol Manag 381:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.015
van der Werf A, van Nuenen M, Visser AJ, Lambers H (1993) Contribution of physiological and morphological plant traits to a species’ competitive ability at high and low nitrogen supply. Oecologia 94(3):434–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317120
Wareing PF (1972) Some further aspects of control of crop processes. Crop processes in controlled environment. Acad. Press, London-New York
Willis JC, Yule GU (1922) Some statistics of evolution and geographical distribution in plants and animals, and their significance. Nature 109:177–179. https://doi.org/10.1038/109177a0
Wilson SD, Tilman D (1995) Competitive responses of eight old-field plant species in four environments. Ecology 76(4):1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940924
Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R, Mencuccini M (2005) Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fenn Monographs 4:63
Acknowledgements
This study was initiated by Prof. Alexander Komarov and represents the outputs of long-term collaboration between Finnish and Russian research teams. We would like to thank Dr. Elena Maznaya and Dr. Irina Lyanguzova for providing the data on bilberry development and Gulfina Frolova for help in data collection and discussion of research results. The research was supported by the Academy of Finland, projects 322972 (STANDS), 336570 (SOMPA), the Karelia CBC programme financed by the European Union, the Republic of Finland and the Russian Federation, project ECODIVE (collection of field data, analysis of data and preparation of the manuscript). The work of P. Frolov, V. Shanin, E. Zubkova and P. Grabarnik was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project #18-14-00362 (statistical treatment of experimental data, analysis of relationships and lead authorship of the manuscript). We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for the insightful comments, which helped us to substantially improve the manuscript.
Funding
The research was supported by the Academy of Finland, projects 322972 (STANDS), 336570 (SOMPA), the Karelia CBC programme financed by the European Union, the Republic of Finland and the Russian Federation, project ECODIVE (collection of field data, analysis of data and preparation of the manuscript). The work of P. Frolov, V. Shanin, E. Zubkova and P. Grabarnik was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project #18-14-00362 (statistical treatment of experimental data, analysis of relationships and lead authorship of the manuscript). We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for the insightful comments, which helped us to substantially improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Communicated by Lori Biederman.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frolov, P., Shanin, V., Zubkova, E. et al. Predicting biomass of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) using rank distribution and root-to-shoot ratio models. Plant Ecol 223, 131–140 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-021-01199-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-021-01199-1