Abstract
Although much effort has been devoted to identify plant traits related to invasiveness, the success of this approach remains elusive, likely because the relevance of particular traits for invasions is context-dependent. We studied plant invasions in the context of the recipient community in a mountain ecosystem of western Argentina by comparing traits between two non-native shrubs, Rosa canina and R. rubiginosa, and all native shrubs coexisting with them. We expected that both rose species differed from natives in traits related to an acquisitive strategy of resources. We grouped native shrubs into species with high (abundant) and low abundance (rare). We expected smaller differences between non-natives and abundant natives than between non-natives and rare natives, as shrub abundance may depend on possessing a particular suite of traits, independent of species origin. We found that both rose species were different from native shrubs when analyzing all traits in combination. Non-natives presented a strategy that may allow them to acquire resources and grow at faster rates than natives, offering support to our prediction. Yet, native and non-native shrub species overlapped in flower phenology. When comparing non-natives to abundant and rare natives, we found no support for our expectation, as non-natives did not show smaller differences with abundant natives, but shared similarities with rare natives. This pattern suggests successful coexistence via niche partitioning, but this possibility deserves future studies. Our work highlights the importance of considering non-native plant traits in a community context to further understand the invasion process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Aguirre G, Ciuffo G, Ciuffo L (2009) Genetic differentiation of Rosa rubiginosa L. in two different Argentinean ecoregions. Plant Syst Evol 281(1–4):183–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0200-x
Braun-Blanquet J, Conrad HS, Fuller GD (1933) Plant sociology: the study of plant communities. Nature. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.7161
Cavallero L, Raffaele E (2010) Fire enhances the ‘competition-free’ space of an invader shrub: Rosa rubiginosa in northwestern Patagonia. Biol Invasions 12:3395–3404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9738-3
Core Team R (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb003648
Dalmasso A, Martinez Carretero E, Videla F, Puig S, Candia R (1999) Reserva Natural Villavicencio (Mendoza, Argentina). Plan de Manejo. Multequina 8:11–50
Damascos MA, Gallopin G (1992) Ecología de un arbusto introducido (Rosa rubiginosa L. = Rosa eglanteria L.): riesgo de invasión y efectos en las comunidades vegetales de la región andino-patagónica de Argentina. Rev Chil Hist Nat 65:395–407
Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarine MG, Gonzales L, Tablada M, Robledo C (2018) InfoStat versión 2018. 15
Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Gallagher RV, Randall RP, Leishman MR (2015) Trait differences between naturalized and invasive plant species independent of residence time and phylogeny. Conserv Biol 29:360–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12399
Gerlach JD, Rice KJ (2003) Testing life history correlates of invasiveness using congeneric plant species. Ecol Appl 13(1):167–179. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013%5b0167:tlhcoi%5d2.0.co;2
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical J 50:346–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425
Hulme PE, Bernard-Verdier M (2018) Comparing traits of native and alien plants: can we do better? Funct Ecol 32:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12982
Lediuk KD, Damascos MA, Puntieri JG, Svriz M (2014) Differences in phenology and fruit characteristic between invasive and native woody species favor exotic species invasiveness. Plant Ecol 215:1455–1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0402-3
Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical Ecology SECOND ENGLISH EDITION
Leishman MR, Thomson VP, Cooke J (2010) Native and exotic invasive plants have fundamentally similar carbon capture strategies. J Ecol 98:28–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01608.x
Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG (2004) A meta analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol Lett 7:975–989
Lloret F, Medail F, Brundu G, Camarda I, Moragues E, Rita J, Lambdon P, Hulme PE (2005) Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands. J Ecol 93:512–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.00979.x
MacDougall AS, Gilbert B, Levine JM (2009) Plant invasions and the niche. J Ecol 97:609–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01514.x
Moles AT, Gruber MAM, Bonser SP (2008) A new framework for predicting invasive plant species. J Ecol 96:13–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01332.x
Moles AT, Flores-Moreno H, Bonser SP, Warton DI, Helm A, Warman L, Eldridge DJ, Jurado E, Hemmings FA, Reich PB, Cavender-Bares J, Seabloom EW, Mayfield MM, Sheil D, Djietror JC, Peri PL, Enrico L, Cabido MR, Setterfield SA, Lehmann CER, Thomson FJ (2012) Invasions: the trail behind, the path ahead, and a test of a disturbing idea. J Ecol 100:116–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01915.x
Oksanen J, Guillaume Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O'Hara R, Gavin Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2016) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.3-3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
Ordonez A, Olff H (2013) Do alien plant species profit more from high resource supply than natives? A trait-based analysis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:648–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12019
Pearson DE, Ortega YK, Sears SJ (2011) Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis up-close: intermountain grassland invaders differ morphologically and phenologically from native community dominants. Biol Invasions 14:901–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0126-4
Pearson DE, Ortega YK, Eren Ö, Hierro JL (2018) Community assembly theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 33:313–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.002
Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Bret-Harte MS, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Gurvich DE, Urcelay C, Veneklaas EJ, Reich PB, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Ray P, Enrico L, Pausas JG, Vos De, Buchmann CN, Funes G, Quétier F, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Morgan MD, Ter Steege H, Van Der Heijden MG, Sack L, Blonder B, Poschlod P, Vaieretti MV, Conti G, Staver C, Aquino S, Cornelissen JHC (2013) New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 61:167–234. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT12225
Pleasants JM (1990) Null-model tests for competitive displacement: the fallacy of not focusing on the whole community. Ecology 71:1078–1084
Pysek P, Richardson D (2008) Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Nentwig W (ed) Biological Invasions. Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 97–125
Shiflett SA, Zinnert JC, Young DR (2017) Functional traits of expanding, thicket-forming shrubs: contrasting strategies between exotic and native species. Ecosphere 8(9):e01918. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1918
Strauss SY, Webb CO, Salamin N (2006) Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:5841–5845. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508073103
Tecco PA, Dí-az S, Cabido M, Urcelay C (2010) Functional traits of alien plants across contrasting climatic and land-use regimes: do aliens join the locals or try harder than them? J Ecol 98:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01592.x
Tecco PA, Urcelay C, Díaz S, Cabido M, Pérez-Harguindeguy N (2013) Contrasting functional trait syndromes underlay woody alien success in the same ecosystem. Austral Ecol 38:443–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02428.x
van Kleunen M, Richardson DM (2007) Invasion biology and conservation biology: time to join forces to explore the links between species traits and extinction risk and invasiveness. Prog Phys Geogr 31:447–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133307081295
van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Schlaepfer D, Jeschke JM, Fischer M (2010a) Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecol Lett 13:947–958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01503.x
Van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010b) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett 13:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01418.x
Zimmermann H, von Wehrden H, Renison D, Karsten W, Welk E, Damascos MA, Hensen I (2012) Shrub management is the principal driver of differing population sizes between native and invasive populations of Rosa rubiginosa L. Biol Invasions 14:2141–2157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0220-2
Acknowledgments
We thank the administration of Villavicencio Natural Reserve for providing permission to conduct this study and Hugo Debandi for his help during field work. This research was funded through a grant from Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (FONCYT; PICT-2010-2779).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Devan Allen McGranahan.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mazzolari, A.C., Hierro, J.L. & Vázquez, D.P. Analysis of an invasion in the community context: a case study about differences and similarities between native and non-native shrubs. Plant Ecol 221, 83–89 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-019-00994-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-019-00994-1